Understanding the Elephant: The Discourse Approach to Boundary Identification and Corpus Construction for Theory Review Articles
暂无分享,去创建一个
Alan R. Dennis | Jevin D. West | Kai R. Larsen | Dirk Hovorka | A. Dennis | D. Hovorka | Kai R. T. Larsen
[1] Ana Ortiz de Guinea,et al. What literature review type should I conduct , 2017 .
[2] Maher M El-Masri,et al. Non-probability sampling. , 2017, The Canadian nurse.
[3] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. A Recommendation System Based on Hierarchical Clustering of an Article-Level Citation Network , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.
[4] Kai R. Larsen,et al. A Tool for Addressing Construct Identity in Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses , 2016, MIS Q..
[5] Michael A. McDaniel,et al. The Validity of Conscientiousness Is Overestimated in the Prediction of Job Performance , 2015, PloS one.
[6] Guy Paré,et al. A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[7] Mike Chiasson,et al. Avoiding methodological overdose: a declaration for independent ends , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..
[8] Richard T. Watson,et al. Beyond being systematic in literature reviews in IS , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..
[9] Ulrike Schultze,et al. Skirting SLR’s language trap: reframing the ‘systematic’ vs ‘traditional’ literature review opposition as a continuum , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..
[10] Qing Ke,et al. Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] Alan R. Dennis,et al. A Replication Manifesto , 2014, AIS Trans. Replication Res..
[12] Björn Niehaves,et al. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[13] Eunju Ko,et al. Fashion Consumers' Acceptance of Retail Technology: A Meta-Analysis of Tam in Fashion Retail Context , 2015 .
[14] Michael A. McDaniel,et al. Publication bias: Understanding the myths concerning threats to the advancement of science. , 2015 .
[15] Mary Tate,et al. Introduction to the Special Issue: The Literature Review in Information Systems , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[16] Michael G. Aamodt. Industrial/Organizational Psychology: An Applied Approach , 2010 .
[17] Suzanne Rivard,et al. Editor's comments: the ions of theory construction , 2014 .
[18] Frantz Rowe,et al. What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[19] Sebastian K. Boell,et al. A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[20] Martin Boeker,et al. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[21] B. Mullen. Advanced Basic Meta-analysis: Version 1.10 , 2013 .
[22] Inder Singh Devendra Kumar Punia,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2013 .
[23] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. Author-level Eigenfactor metrics: Evaluating the influence of authors, institutions, and countries within the social science research network community , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[24] Joseph Tan,et al. Perceived Usefulness and Behavioral Intention to Use Consumer-Oriented Web-Based Health Tools: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, AMCIS.
[25] Chitu Okoli,et al. A Critical Realist Guide to Developing Theory with Systematic Literature Reviews , 2012 .
[26] Michael A. McDaniel,et al. Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences , 2012 .
[27] Ron Weber,et al. Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[28] Qinghua Zhu,et al. A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..
[29] DongPing Tang,et al. A review of the evolution of research on information Technology Acceptance Model , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Business Management and Electronic Information.
[30] Chyan Yang,et al. International Journal of Information Management the Intellectual Development of the Technology Acceptance Model: a Co-citation Analysis , 2022 .
[31] Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al. Is UTAUT really used or just cited for the sake of it? a systematic review of citations of UTAUT's originating article , 2011, ECIS.
[32] Jan Pries-Heje,et al. Explanatory Design Theory , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..
[33] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. Detecting Fake Websites: The Contribution of Statistical Learning Theory , 2010, MIS Q..
[34] Pearl Brereton,et al. Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[35] Richard J. Holden,et al. The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.
[36] Ian H. Witten,et al. The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.
[37] Yongsheng Jin,et al. A Review of Technology Acceptance Model in the E-commerce Environment , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government.
[38] Robert P. Bostrom,et al. A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[39] Björn Niehaves,et al. Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.
[40] Albert L. Lederer,et al. A Meta-Analysis of the Role of Environment-Based Voluntariness in Information Technology Acceptance , 2009, MIS Q..
[41] Maria J Grant,et al. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.
[42] Mohammad Chuttur,et al. Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions , 2009 .
[43] Detmar W. Straub,et al. Creating Blue Oceans of Thought Via Highly Citable Articles , 2009 .
[44] Dirk S. Hovorka,et al. Analyzing unstructured text data: Using latent categorization to identify intellectual communities in information systems , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..
[45] Huaying Shu,et al. Review of relationships among variables in TAM , 2008 .
[46] Shumaila Y. Yousafzai,et al. Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 2 , 2007 .
[47] Gordon R. Foxall,et al. Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1 , 2007 .
[48] Radford M. Neal. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.
[49] Wynne W. Chin,et al. Understanding frameworks and reviews: a commentary to assist us in moving our field forward by analyzing our past , 2007, DATB.
[50] Matthew S. Fritz,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect , 2022 .
[51] Jiayin Qi,et al. A Review on the Relationship Between New Variables and Classical TAM Structure , 2007, CONFENIS.
[52] Martin Wetzels,et al. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..
[53] Matthew R. Jones,et al. Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..
[54] William R. King,et al. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..
[55] Shirley Gregor,et al. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..
[56] Eytan Domany,et al. On the Number of Samples Needed to Learn the Correct Structure of a Bayesian Network , 2006, UAI.
[57] Jesse A. Berlin,et al. Preventing Publication Bias: Registries and Prospective Meta‐Analysis , 2006 .
[58] E. Garfield. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.
[59] Weiguo Fan,et al. Genetic Programming-Based Discovery of Ranking Functions for Effective Web Search , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[60] C. McCulloch,et al. Ethics and sample size. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.
[61] Qingxiong Ma,et al. The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..
[62] Younghwa Lee,et al. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[63] Gordon B. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..
[64] Miguel P Caldas,et al. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .
[65] Detmar W. Straub,et al. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..
[66] E. Rogers,et al. Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.
[67] John Ingham,et al. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..
[68] Sayan Mukherjee,et al. Estimating Dataset Size Requirements for Classifying DNA Microarray Data , 2003, J. Comput. Biol..
[69] Venkataraman Ramesh,et al. Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[70] Charles J. Kacmar,et al. Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..
[71] Richard T. Watson,et al. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..
[72] Pawel Wocjan,et al. Required sample size for learning sparse Bayesian networks with many variables , 2002, ArXiv.
[73] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..
[74] Dorothy E. Leidner,et al. Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning - A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..
[75] Rajeev Sharma,et al. An evaluation of a major validity threat to the technology acceptance model , 2001, ECIS.
[76] Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al. A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..
[77] Thomas H. Davenport,et al. Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .
[78] James H. Martin,et al. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition , 2000 .
[79] Rajeev Motwani,et al. The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.
[80] Earl R. Babbie,et al. The Basics Of Social Research , 1998 .
[81] Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al. An Information Company in Mexico: Extending the Resource-Based View of the Firm to a Developing Country Context , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..
[82] K. Berger,et al. The Developing Person Through Childhood and Adolescence , 1997 .
[83] K. Weick. What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .
[84] Deborah Compeau,et al. Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..
[85] Gerardine DeSanctis,et al. Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .
[86] Erik Brynjolfsson,et al. The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.
[87] Lawrence D. Jackel,et al. Learning Curves: Asymptotic Values and Rate of Convergence , 1993, NIPS.
[88] Michael W. Kattan,et al. A Comparison of Machine Learning with Human Judgment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[89] Ephraim R. McLean,et al. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..
[90] I. Ajzen. The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .
[91] Eugene Charniak,et al. Bayesian Networks without Tears , 1991, AI Mag..
[92] Jürgen Habermas,et al. Jürgen Habermas: Morality, Society and Ethics , 1990 .
[93] A. J. Meadows. Theory in information science , 1990, J. Inf. Sci..
[94] Judea Pearl,et al. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.
[95] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..
[96] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[97] J A Swets,et al. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.
[98] William J. Doll,et al. The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..
[99] D. G. Cramp,et al. Computers and Control in Clinical Medicine , 1985 .
[100] A. Kellerman,et al. The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .
[101] R. Rosenthal. Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .
[102] David A. Landgrebe,et al. Predicting the Required Number of Training Samples , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[103] J. R. Landis,et al. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.
[104] Jacob Cohen. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .