High level tools for fusion simulations workflows in distributed computing environment

This paper describes chosen aspects of the European Integrated Tokamak Modelling Task Force (ITM-TF) effort. It covers topics related to latest developments towards providing fusion scientists with a software framework for fusion modeling and simulation. The proposed framework provides researchers with an easy to use, workflow based environment for scientific computations. It allows the execution of various applications in numerous distributed computational resources directly from a user friendly, intuitive interface. We present the latest advances in the development of easy to use tools allowing the integration of the physics codes into the scientific workflows that schedule jobs to different infrastructures. The presented approach provides a simple way to access extensive computational resources and hides the complexity of the process at the same time. It allows for easy extension of existing simulation scenarios and fast prototyping. Some aspects of interactive communication between workflow environment and running jobs are discussed. Results of two practical use cases are presented in the context of the discussed workflow based solution: a parametric study and a plasma turbulence workflow.

[1]  Marcus Hardt,et al.  EU fusion for Iter applications , 2008 .

[2]  Douglas Thain,et al.  Distributed computing in practice: the Condor experience , 2005, Concurr. Pract. Exp..

[3]  Morris Riedel,et al.  DEISA—Distributed European Infrastructure for Supercomputing Applications , 2011, Journal of Grid Computing.

[4]  Ian T. Foster Globus Toolkit Version 4: Software for Service-Oriented Systems , 2005, NPC.

[5]  Bertram Ludäscher,et al.  Kepler: an extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows , 2004 .

[6]  Ian T. Foster,et al.  Globus Toolkit Version 4: Software for Service-Oriented Systems , 2005, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[7]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Scientific workflows for the linear MHD stability analysis Chain , 2010 .

[8]  Ian J. Taylor,et al.  Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities , 2009, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[9]  Per Strand,et al.  A generic data structure for integrated modelling of tokamak physics and subsystems , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[10]  Björn Hagemeier,et al.  UNICORE 6 — Recent and Future Advancements , 2010, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[11]  R. Capuzzo-Dolcetta PRACE: Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe , 2010 .

[12]  Scott Klasky,et al.  Scientific Process Automation and Workflow Management , 2009, Scientific Data Management.

[13]  Ami Marowka,et al.  The GRID: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure , 2000, Parallel Distributed Comput. Pract..

[14]  J. B. Lister,et al.  A universal access layer for the Integrated Tokamak Modelling Task Force , 2008 .

[15]  Ian Foster,et al.  The Grid 2 - Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, Second Edition , 1998, The Grid 2, 2nd Edition.

[16]  Gabriele Manduchi,et al.  High Performance Computing tools for the Integrated Tokamak Modelling project , 2010 .

[17]  Scott Klasky,et al.  Workflow automation for processing plasma fusion simulation data , 2007, WORKS '07.

[18]  Bruce D. Scott,et al.  Free-energy conservation in local gyrofluid models , 2005 .

[19]  Isabel Campos Plasencia,et al.  Scientific workflow orchestration interoperating HTC and HPC resources , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[20]  J. Stillerman,et al.  MDSplus data acquisition system , 1997 .