Asylum Seekers and Resettled Refugees in Australia: Predicting Social Policy Attitude From Prejudice Versus Emotion

While most of the world's refugees reside in developing countries, their arrival to western countries is highly politicised, giving rise to questions about the types of entitlements and rights that should, or should not, be granted. In this study, using a mixed-methods community questionnaire (N = 185), we examined attitudes towards social policies aimed at providing assistance to two categories of new arrivals to Australia: resettled refugees (who arrive via its official refugee resettlement program) and asylum seekers (who arrive via boat and then seek refugee status). Social policy attitude was examined as a consequence of feelings of anger, fear, and threat, as well as levels of prejudice. Participants felt significantly higher levels of anger, fear, threat, and prejudice towards asylum seekers compared to resettled refugees. For both resettled refugees and asylum seekers, prejudice was an independent predictor of more restrictive social policy attitudes. For resettled refugees, fear and perceived threat were independent predictors for more restrictive social policy whereas for asylum seekers anger was an independent predictor of restrictive social policy. The qualitative data reinforced the quantitative findings and extended understanding on the appraisals that underpin negative attitudes and emotional responses. Practical implications relating to challenging community attitudes are discussed.

[1]  Anne Pedersen,et al.  Anger and Guilt About Ingroup Advantage Explain the Willingness for Political Action , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  R. Kane,et al.  The willingness of a society to act on behalf of Indigenous Australians and refugees: the role of contact, intergroup anxiety, prejudice, and support for legislative change , 2013 .

[3]  Nick Lynn,et al.  `A Phantom Menace and the New Apartheid': The Social Construction of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom , 2003 .

[4]  Brian T. Griffiths,et al.  Prejudice against asylum seekers and the fear of terrorism: The importance of context , 2007 .

[5]  L. Montada,et al.  Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged , 1989 .

[6]  Tristan G. Creek.  Starving for freedom: an exploration of Australian government policies, human rights obligations and righting the wrong for those seeking asylum , 2014 .

[7]  Anne Pedersen,et al.  Re-examining prejudice against asylum seekers in Australia: The role of people smugglers, the perception of threat, and acceptance of false beliefs , 2012 .

[8]  Anne Pedersen,et al.  "The situation is hopeless; we must take the next step": Reflecting on social action by academics in asylum seeker policy debate , 2013 .

[9]  Austin Lee Nichols,et al.  Predicting policy attitudes from general prejudice versus specific intergroup emotions , 2010 .

[10]  Anne Pedersen,et al.  Can We Make a Difference? Prejudice Towards Asylum Seekers in Australia and the Effectiveness of Antiprejudice Interventions , 2015 .

[11]  F. Barlow,et al.  Theory to social action: A university-based strategy targeting prejudice against Aboriginal Australians , 2008 .

[12]  H. Bauder.  Dialectics of Humanitarian Immigration and National Identity in Canadian Public Discourse , 2008 .

[13]  W. E. Burghardt DuBois,et al.  Education and Work , 1932 .

[14]  N. Haslam,et al.  Attitudes Towards Asylum Seekers: The Australian Experience , 2012 .

[15]  Y. Paradies,et al.  Bystander Antiprejudice: Cross-Cultural Education, Links With Positivity Towards Cultural ‘Outgroups’ and Preparedness to Speak Out , 2011 .

[16]  F. Fozdar,et al.  Refugee Resettlement in Australia: What we know and need to know , 2013 .

[17]  John G. Geer,et al.  DO OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS MEASURE “SALIENT” ISSUES? , 1991 .

[18]  J. Dandy,et al.  Attitudes towards asylum seekers: Evaluating a mature-aged community education programme , 2012 .

[19]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[20]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups : A Sociofunctional Threat-Based Approach to “ Prejudice ” , 2005 .

[21]  M. Verkuyten.  Emotional Reactions to and Support for Immigrant Policies: Attributed Responsibilities to Categories of Asylum Seekers , 2004 .

[22]  Tim Martin,et al.  The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. , 2005 .

[23]  K. Dunn,et al.  Who's Driving the Asylum Debate? Newspaper and Government Representations of Asylum Seekers , 2003 .

[24]  D. Every,et al.  Taking advantage' or fleeing persecution? Opposing accounts of asylum seeking , 2008 .

[25]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Aligning Identities, Emotions, and Beliefs to Create Commitment to Sustainable Social and Political Action , 2009, Personality and Social Psychology Review.

[26]  M. E. A. Hollands.  Upon closer acquintance. The impact of direct contact with refugees on Dutch hosts , 2001 .

[27]  S. Fiske.  Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. , 1998 .

[28]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Martijn van Zomeren,et al.  Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship , 2010 .

[30]  Susan E. Watt,et al.  The role of false beliefs in the community's and the federal government's attitudes toward Australian asylum seekers , 2006 .

[31]  Clara L. Wilkins,et al.  Group Identification and Prejudice: Theoretical and Empirical Advances and Implications , 2010 .

[32]  D. Marx,et al.  Attitudes toward unauthorized immigrants, authorized immigrants, and refugees. , 2013, Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology.

[33]  F. McKay,et al.  ‘It would be okay if they came through the proper channels’: community perceptions and attitudes toward asylum seekers in Australia , 2012 .

[34]  Russell Spears,et al.  Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Psychological Perspectives on Immigration , 2010 .

[36]  Anne Pedersen,et al.  Refugee Without Refuge: Wasim, Phillip Adams, and a Nation Divided , 2010 .

[37]  L. Hartley,et al.  Policy as punishment: asylum seekers in the community without the right to work , 2014 .

[38]  Erin O’Brien,et al.  'Genuine' refugees or illegitimate 'boat people': Political constructions of asylum seekers and refugees in the Malaysia Deal debate , 2014 .

[39]  C. Leach,et al.  Emotion in inter-group relations , 2008 .

[40]  Brian T. Griffiths,et al.  Prejudice against Australian asylum-seekers and their function: Suggestions for anti-prejudice strategies , 2008 .

[41]  R. Schweitzer,et al.  Attitudes towards Refugees: The Dark Side of Prejudice in Australia , 2005 .

[42]  Anne Pedersen,et al.  Asylum seekers: How attributions and emotion affect Australians' views on mandatory detention of “the other” , 2007 .