When Visual Product Features Speak the Same Language: Effects of Shape-Typeface Congruence on Brand Perception and Price Expectations*

Recent studies in marketing research and consumer psychology indicate that congruence, as opposed to incongruence, of symbolic meanings connoted across or within marketing mix elements positively affects consumer response. However, controlled studies addressing congruence effects among visual product features such as shape and typeface are nonexistent. Since consumer products comprise multiple visual elements that connote symbolic meanings, and considering that a product's visual appearance is an important determinant of consumer choice, such studies are called for. Based on processing fluency accounts, the authors argue that shape-typeface congruence facilitates stimulus processing, thereby positively affecting perceptions of brand credibility, brand aesthetics, and brand value; the latter reflected in higher price expectations. Two studies were conducted to test these predictions. In study 1, two shape variants and two typeface variants of a fictitious brand of bottled water connoted either luxury or casualness. Cross-pairing the two shapes with the two typefaces resulted in four product variants, either congruent or incongruent in terms of the symbolic meanings connoted. Participants were randomly presented with one of the product variants, after which they filled out a questionnaire comprising the dependent measures. Largely in line with expectations, results revealed overall positive effects of meaning congruence on perceptions of brand credibility and price expectations. In addition to replicating the findings from study 1 using another set of stimuli, study 2 tested the prediction that meaning congruence positively affects perceptions of brand aesthetics. As in study 1, four product variants were created by cross pairing two product shapes and two typefaces, this time connoting either masculinity or femininity. In line with the findings from study 1, results revealed overall positive congruence effects. In addition, subsequent analyses showed that perceived brand aesthetics partially mediates congruence effects on price expectations, indicating that consumers expect to pay more for congruent variants because they are considered more attractive. The findings presented testify to the importance of careful consideration of visual product features and the symbolic meanings they connote, and stress the importance of perceived brand aesthetics. In discussing these findings, it is proposed that congruence effects and the mediating processes involved may vary across product categories and depend on consumer personality. In addition, the findings presented are discussed in relation to research indicating that moderate degrees of incongruence may be useful for attracting consumer attention and stimulating information processing. Managerial implications and avenues for future research are discussed.

[1]  H. Friedman The interactive effects of facial expressions of emotion and verbal messages on perceptions of affective meaning , 1979 .

[2]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Marvin Berkowitz,et al.  Product shape as a design innovation strategy , 1987 .

[4]  Mark L. Johnson The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[5]  K. Rotenberg,et al.  Children's use of a verbal-nonverbal consistency principle to infer truth and lying. , 1989, Child development.

[6]  M. Bullock,et al.  Interpreting contradictory communications: Age and context effects , 1990 .

[7]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency? , 1992 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[9]  Kevin Lane Keller Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[10]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure , 1993 .

[11]  Mary T. Curren,et al.  How Does the Congruity of Brand Names Affect Evaluations of Brand Name Extensions , 1994 .

[12]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response: , 1995 .

[13]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Language and Brand Attitudes: Impact of Script and Sound Matching in Chinese and English , 1996 .

[14]  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[15]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation , 1997 .

[16]  J. Swait,et al.  Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon , 1998 .

[17]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[18]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Responses to Information Incongruency in Advertising: The Role of Expectancy, Relevancy, and Humor , 1999 .

[19]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  All Dressed Up With Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory , 2002 .

[21]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[22]  J. Swait,et al.  Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice , 2004 .

[23]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Impression Management using Typeface Design , 2004 .

[24]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[25]  Robert Kreuzbauer,et al.  Embodied Cognition and New Product Design: Changing Product Form to Influence Brand Categorization , 2005 .

[26]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[27]  Daniel Saakes,et al.  Grounding abstract object characteristics in embodied interactions. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Jaideep Sengupta,et al.  Two Roads to Updating Brand Personality Impressions: Trait versus Evaluative Inferencing , 2005 .

[29]  Jaewon Kang,et al.  Online Shopping Hesitation , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  Lydia J. Price,et al.  The Impact of Self-Construal on Aesthetic Preference for Angular Versus Rounded Shapes , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[31]  John R. Doyle,et al.  The interactive effects of colors and products on perceptions of brand logo appropriateness , 2006 .

[32]  P. Hekkert Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design , 2006 .

[33]  Christian Unkelbach,et al.  Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Geke D.S. Ludden,et al.  Surprise As a Design Strategy , 2008, Design Issues.

[35]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  Symbolic Meaning Integration in Design and its Influence on Product and Brand Evaluation , 2009 .