Aquacrop Model Calibration in Potato and Its Use to Estimate Yield Variability under Field Conditions

AquaCrop model estimates the crop productivity decrease in response to water stress, determining the biomass (B) based on water productivity (WP) and accumulated transpiration (ΣTr); and the yield (Y) is calculated according to B and the harvest index (HI). AquaCrop was evaluated considering different WP values for 2010 late growing season to simulate crop yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cv. Spunta, in a commercial production field of 9 ha located in the green belt of Cordoba city (31°30'S, 64°08'W, 402 m asl), while monitoring in 2009 was used to verify the model. Canopy cover estimation by AquaCrop was adjusted using observed field data obtained from vertical digital photographs acquired at 2.5 m height. WP values of 15.8 and 31.6 (for C3 and C4 species, respectively) and two intermediate values 21 and 26.3 g·mˉ2 were considered to evaluate the model performance. While linear function between observed tuber yields and estimated by AquaCrop had always a correlation coefficient greater than 0.94 (p 0.001), using WP = 26.3 and WP =31.6 g·mˉ2 presented overestimation, whereas with 15.8 g·mˉ2 had an opposite behavior, while WP = 21 g·mˉ2 was the value that produced the lowest estimation error. In addition, soil moisture from this estimated value of WP was highly correlated with measured water content in different areas of production field. The verification test shows that while the model slightly underestimates canopy cover, biomass was overestimated. After setting the coefficients of canopy cover development, the AquaCrop crop model estimated adequately potato yield for high production values that are less affected by lack of water, but in both years showed a tendency to overestimate the lowest yields, as was observed for other crops. Meanwhile, the dispersion between the observed and estimated yield was higher in the verification test because the sampling this year was more random.

[1]  D. Raes,et al.  Simulating yield response to water of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) with FAO-AquaCrop , 2008 .

[2]  P. L. Kooman,et al.  Effects of climate on different potato genotypes 1. Radiation interception, total and tuber dry matter production , 1996 .

[3]  A. D. L. Casa,et al.  Uso del Índice de Área Foliar y del Porcentaje de Cobertura del Suelo Para Estimar la Radiación Interceptada en Papa , 2007 .

[4]  H. Farahani,et al.  Parameterization and Evaluation of the AquaCrop Model for Full and Deficit Irrigated Cotton , 2009 .

[5]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop — The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: II. Main Algorithms and Software Description , 2009 .

[6]  Michael Robertson,et al.  Integrating farmer knowledge, precision agriculture tools, and crop simulation modelling to evaluate management options for poor-performing patches in cropping fields , 2010 .

[7]  D. G. Westfall,et al.  Comparison of Site-Specific Management Zones: Soil-Color-Based and Yield-Based , 2006 .

[8]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  ASPECTS OF PRECISION AGRICULTURE , 1999 .

[9]  J. A. Tolk,et al.  Introduction: Can Water Use Efficiency Be Modeled Well Enough to Impact Crop Management? , 2009 .

[10]  P. Struik,et al.  Survey of potato production and possible yield constraints in Argentina , 1999, Potato Research.

[11]  S. Snapp,et al.  Potato Yield Variability across the Landscape , 2010 .

[12]  Charlie Walker,et al.  Estimating the nitrogen status of crops using a digital camera , 2010 .

[13]  C. Stöckle,et al.  Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. , 2009 .

[14]  S. Evett,et al.  Validating the FAO AquaCrop Model for Irrigated and Water Deficient Field Maize , 2009 .

[15]  A. J. Haverkort,et al.  Agro-ecological zoning and potential yield of single or double cropping of potato in Argentina , 2001 .

[16]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency , 1999 .

[17]  P. Pinter,et al.  Measuring Wheat Senescence with a Digital Camera , 1999 .

[18]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop-The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles , 2009 .

[19]  D. Raes,et al.  Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop , 2009 .

[20]  E. Fereres,et al.  On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity , 2007, Irrigation Science.

[21]  J. L. Dardanelli,et al.  ROOTING DEPTH AND SOIL WATER EXTRACTION PATTERNS OF DIFFERENT CROPS IN A SILTY LOAM HAPLUSTOLL , 1997 .

[22]  R. Gordon,et al.  Relationship between leaf area index and ground cover in potato under different management conditions , 2002, Potato Research.

[23]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction , 2002 .

[24]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Efficient Water Use in Crop Production: Research or Re‐Search? , 2015 .

[25]  H. Tooming,et al.  Potato production model based on principle of maximum plant productivity , 2004 .

[26]  W. Rawls,et al.  Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions , 2006 .

[27]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop—The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: III. Parameterization and Testing for Maize , 2009 .