Assembly of Nsp1 Nucleoporins Provides Insight into Nuclear Pore Complex Gating

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) form gateways for material transfer across the nuclear envelope of eukaryotic cells. Disordered proteins, rich in phenylalanine-glycine repeat motifs (FG-nups), form the central transport channel. Understanding how nups are arranged in the interior of the NPC may explain how NPC functions as a selectivity filter for transport of large molecules and a sieve-like filter for diffusion of small molecules (< or ). We employed molecular dynamics to model the structures formed by various assemblies of one kind of nup, namely the 609-aa-long FG domain of Nsp1 (Nsp1-FG). The simulations started from different initial conformations and geometrical arrangements of Nsp1-FGs. In all cases Nsp1-FGs collectively formed brush-like structures with bristles made of bundles of 2–27 nups, however, the bundles being cross-linked through single nups leaving one bundle and joining a nearby one. The degree of cross-linking varies with different initial nup conformations and arrangements. Structural analysis reveals that FG-repeats of the nups not only involve formation of bundle structures, but are abundantly present in cross-linking regions where the epitopes of FG-repeats are highly accessible. Large molecules that are assisted by transport factors (TFs) are selectively transported through NPC apparently by binding to FG-nups through populated FG-binding pockets on the TF surface. Therefore, our finding suggests that TFs bind concertedly to multiple FGs in cross-linking regions and break-up the bundles to create wide pores for themselves and their cargoes to pass. In addition, the cross-linking between Nsp1-FG bundles, arising from simulations, is found to set a molecular size limit of < for passive diffusion of molecules. Our simulations suggest that the NPC central channel, near the periphery where tethering of nups is dominant, features brush-like moderately cross-linked bundles, but in the central region, where tethering loses its effect, features a sieve-like structure of bundles and frequent cross-links.

[1]  Clifford Stein,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd edition. , 2001 .

[2]  G. Fredrickson.  The theory of polymer dynamics , 1996 .

[3]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  Peter L. Freddolino,et al.  Chapter 11 Molecular Modeling of the Structural Properties and Formation of High-Density Lipoprotein Particles , 2008 .

[5]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[6]  D. Görlich,et al.  A Saturated FG-Repeat Hydrogel Can Reproduce the Permeability Properties of Nuclear Pore Complexes , 2007, Cell.

[7]  I. Macara.  Transport into and out of the Nucleus , 2001, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[8]  C. Guarneri.  Cornell University Press , 1991 .

[9]  B. Chait,et al.  Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies , 2007, Nature.

[10]  A. Doroshenko,et al.  Preparation, structure, and a coarse-grained molecular dynamics model for dodecanethiol-stabilized gold nanoparticles , 2011 .

[11]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 2021, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.

[12]  D. Denning,et al.  Rapid Evolution Exposes the Boundaries of Domain Structure and Function in Natively Unfolded FG Nucleoporins*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  A. Ravve,et al.  Principles of Polymer Chemistry , 1995 .

[14]  D. Görlich,et al.  The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[15]  V. Uversky,et al.  Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  K. Schulten,et al.  Cse1p-binding dynamics reveal a binding pattern for FG-repeat nucleoporins on transport receptors. , 2007, Structure.

[17]  R. Larson,et al.  The MARTINI Coarse-Grained Force Field: Extension to Proteins. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[18]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[19]  Weidong Yang,et al.  'Natively unfolded' nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport , 2011, Nucleus.

[20]  Joshua L. Phillips,et al.  A Bimodal Distribution of Two Distinct Categories of Intrinsically Disordered Structures with Separate Functions in FG Nucleoporins* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[21]  D. Tieleman,et al.  Improving Internal Peptide Dynamics in the Coarse-Grained MARTINI Model: Toward Large-Scale Simulations of Amyloid- and Elastin-like Peptides , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Probing a structural model of the nuclear pore complex channel through molecular dynamics. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[23]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[24]  Ralf P. Richter,et al.  FG-Rich Repeats of Nuclear Pore Proteins Form a Three-Dimensional Meshwork with Hydrogel-Like Properties , 2006, Science.

[25]  Roderick Y. H. Lim,et al.  Nuclear transport receptor binding avidity triggers a self-healing collapse transition in FG-nucleoporin molecular brushes , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  David Neuhaus,et al.  Solution NMR study of the interaction between NTF2 and nucleoporin FxFG repeats. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Yousef Jamali,et al.  Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Nucleocytoplasmic Transport: A Coarse-Grained Model for the Functional State of the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  M. Rout,et al.  Isolation of the yeast nuclear pore complex , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  B. Chait,et al.  The Yeast Nuclear Pore Complex: Composition, Architecture, and Transport Mechanism , 2000 .

[30]  G. Cingolani,et al.  Importin β contains a COOH-terminal nucleoporin binding region important for nuclear transport , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  D. Görlich,et al.  Amyloid-like interactions within nucleoporin FG hydrogels , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Roderick Y. H. Lim,et al.  Converging on the function of intrinsically disordered nucleoporins in the nuclear pore complex , 2010, Biological chemistry.

[33]  T. Littlewood,et al.  GLFG and FxFG Nucleoporins Bind to Overlapping Sites on Importin-β* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Application of Residue-Based and Shape-Based Coarse-Graining to Biomolecular Simulations , 2008 .

[35]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Disassembly of nanodiscs with cholate. , 2007, Nano letters.

[36]  M. Rexach,et al.  Natively Unfolded Nucleoporins Gate Protein Diffusion across the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2007, Cell.

[37]  B. Chait,et al.  Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  K. Schulten,et al.  Binding dynamics of isolated nucleoporin repeat regions to importin-beta. , 2005, Structure.

[39]  B. Chait,et al.  The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex , 2007, Nature.

[40]  C. Akey,et al.  Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: functional and evolutionary implications. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[41]  Weidong Yang,et al.  Three-dimensional distribution of transient interactions in the nuclear pore complex obtained from single-molecule snapshots , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  K. Schulten,et al.  Transport-related structures and processes of the nuclear pore complex studied through molecular dynamics. , 2009, Structure.

[43]  R. Peters.  Translocation Through the Nuclear Pore Complex: Selectivity and Speed by Reduction‐of‐Dimensionality , 2005, Traffic.

[44]  U. Aebi,et al.  Flexible phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  L. Simpson,et al.  In vitro RNA editing‐like activity in a mitochondrial extract from Leishmania tarentolae. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[46]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[47]  K. Schulten,et al.  Association of nuclear pore FG-repeat domains to NTF2 import and export complexes. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  U. Aebi,et al.  Nanomechanical Basis of Selective Gating by the Nuclear Pore Complex , 2007, Science.

[49]  M. Stewart,et al.  Structural basis for the high-affinity binding of nucleoporin Nup1p to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae importin-beta homologue, Kap95p. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  I. Szleifer,et al.  Effect of charge, hydrophobicity, and sequence of nucleoporins on the translocation of model particles through the nuclear pore complex , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  M. Beck,et al.  Facilitated aggregation of FG nucleoporins under molecular crowding conditions , 2013, EMBO reports.

[52]  E. Buhle,et al.  Correlation between structure and mass distribution of the nuclear pore complex and of distinct pore complex components , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.