A new technique for generating disordered point-light animations for the study of biological motion perception.

Studies of biological motion perception often use stimuli depicting human actions portrayed via point-light (PL) displays. Typically, counterpart, or control, stimuli for PL biological motion are created by spatially scrambling motion trajectories of individual PL dots. Depending on the purpose of the study, however, this procedure may be inappropriate as a foil for genuine PL animations, because spatial scrambling not only disrupts coherent motion activity but also eliminates pair-wise motion relationships among dots and, unless corrected, alters the spatial spread of PL dot motions. We introduce a new technique for producing perturbed PL animations, called pair-wise shuffled motion, that preserves the elementary features of biological motion in spatial and motion energy domains and only disrupts the specific sense of global, coherent perception of biological motion. First we describe the procedure for creating pair-wise shuffled motion sequences. Next we compare unperturbed PL animations to pair-wise shuffled motion, to spatially scrambled motion, and to spatially constrained scrambled motion in terms of spatial distributions of the dots, spatiotemporal amplitude spectra derived from Fourier analysis of those sequences, and space-time motion energy associated with those perturbed animations. We then show that the results from those analyses generalize to a large family of PL animations, including the widely used PL walker. Finally we present results from a two-interval forced-choice biological-motion discrimination experiment comparing the robustness of scrambled and pair-wise shuffled motions as foil stimuli. Results from these comparisons suggest that pair-wise shuffled motion offers advantages as a foil stimulus compared to foils using the conventional scrambling technique. Pair-wise shuffled motion provides an additional, effective control display for evaluating PL biological motion perception in future psychophysical, computational, and imaging studies that focus on mechanisms of processing spatiotemporal information signifying biological motion within PL displays.

[1]  T. Schenk,et al.  Visual motion perception after brain damage: II. Deficits in form-from-motion perception , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Learning to See Biological Motion: Brain Activity Parallels Behavior , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  A. Saygin.  Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  Hierarchy of direction-tuned motion adaptation in human visual cortex. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Neural Integration of Information Specifying Human Structure from Form, Motion, and Depth , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor , 2005, Vision Research.

[11]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Oscillatory MEG response to human locomotion is modulated by periventricular lesions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Pavlova.  Biological motion processing as a hallmark of social cognition. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  Perception of biological motion in autism , 2007 .

[15]  T. Kailath.  The Divergence and Bhattacharyya Distance Measures in Signal Selection , 1967 .

[16]  G. Orban,et al.  Human Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Separation and Integration of Shape and Motion Cues in Biological Motion Processing , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Sumi.  Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[18]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  G. Rees,et al.  Normal form from biological motion despite impaired ventral stream function , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Peter Neri,et al.  Action Perception Is Intact in Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Perception of Biological Motion in Schizophrenia and Healthy Individuals: A Behavioral and fMRI Study , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Selective impairment in visual perception of biological motion in obsessive‐compulsive disorder , 2008, Depression and anxiety.

[24]  W. Geisler.  Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[26]  Randolph Blake,et al.  ! ! Individual differences in the perception of biologi cal motion and fragmented figures are not correlated ! " ! ! " ! ! ! ! ! ! ! " ! ! , 2008 .

[27]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain , 1996, Current Biology.

[30]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Perceptual and computational analysis of critical features for biological motion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[31]  A. Klin,et al.  Two-year-olds with autism orient to nonsocial contingencies rather than biological motion , 2009, Nature.

[32]  Pejman Sehatpour,et al.  The neurophysiology of human biological motion processing: A high-density electrical mapping study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Recognition of Biological Motion is Impaired in Children With Autism , 2003, Psychological science.

[34]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Attentional Networks and Biological Motion , 2010 .

[35]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Prior Knowledge about Display Inversion in Biological Motion Perception , 2003, Perception.

[36]  Emily D Grossman,et al.  Temporal "Bubbles" reveal key features for point-light biological motion perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[37]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[38]  James E. Cutting,et al.  A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays , 1978 .

[39]  Emily D. Grossman,et al.  Necessary but not sufficient: Motion perception is required for perceiving biological motion , 2008, Vision Research.

[40]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[41]  Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Do Not Preferentially Attend to Biological Motion , 2012, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.