Object structure and action requirements: A compatibility model for functional recognition

For an intelligent entity to carry out tasks in the real world, perceived three‐dimensional shapes are transformed into objects identified by their functional category which makes explicit the roles or uses of objects in actions. This study describes an approach to the recognition of functions that combines ideas about representations of shapes, concepts, and object categories, with goal requirements of actions. A particular conceptual model of the compatibility between objects and actions is introduced, the outline of the solution is given, and the experimental domain of hand actions and of objects useful in such actions is described; the solution is currently under implementation and computational verifications. the article is organized as follows: first, the computational definition of the problem of functional recognition and a comprehensive theoretical framework for it is given and, second, the relation between primary functions of hand‐manipulable objects and auxillary functions is discussed and modeled in the framework of fuzzy sets and possibility theory.

[1]  B. Tversky,et al.  Objects, parts, and categories. , 1984 .

[2]  Julian R. Ullmann,et al.  An Algorithm for Subgraph Isomorphism , 1976, J. ACM.

[3]  Ramakant Nevatia,et al.  Description and Recognition of Curved Objects , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[4]  E. Rosch ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES1 , 1973 .

[5]  H. Prade,et al.  FUZZY PATTERN MATCHING , 1982 .

[6]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[7]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  Learning structural descriptions from examples , 1970 .

[8]  Lucia M. Vaina,et al.  Towards a Computational Theory of Semantic Memory , 1984 .

[9]  D. Medin,et al.  Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Marie-Christine Jaulent,et al.  Un système souple pour identifier des objets géométriques plans décrits par un opérateur humain , 1986 .

[11]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[14]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Perceptual Organization and the Representation of Natural Form , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Frederick Hayes-Roth,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF PATTERN-DIRECTED INFERENCE SYSTEMS , 1978 .

[16]  D Marr,et al.  Early processing of visual information. , 1976, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  Three dimensional object representation revisited , 1987 .

[18]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[19]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  WHAT'S IN A WORD? ON THE CHILD'S ACQUISITION OF SEMANTICS IN HIS FIRST LANGUAGE , 1973 .