Integrality of nasalization and F1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions.

In vowel perception, nasalization and height (the inverse of the first formant, F1) interact. This paper asks whether the interaction results from a sensory process, decision mechanism, or both. Two experiments used vowels varying in height, degree of nasalization, and three other stimulus parameters: the frequency region of F1, the location of the nasal pole/zero complex relative to F1, and whether a consonant following the vowel was oral or nasal. A fixed-classification experiment, designed to estimate basic sensitivity between stimuli, measured accuracy for discriminating stimuli differing in F1, in nasalization, and on both dimensions. A configuration derived by a multidimensional scaling analysis revealed a perceptual interaction that was stronger for stimuli in which the nasal pole/zero complex was below rather than above the oral pole, and that was present before both nasal and oral consonants. Phonetic identification experiments, designed to measure trading relations between the two dimensions, required listeners to identify height and nasalization in vowels varying in both. Judgments of nasalization depended on F1 as well as on nasalization, whereas judgments of height depended primarily on F1, and on nasalization more when the nasal complex was below than above the oral pole. This pattern was interpreted as a decision-rule interaction that is distinct from the interaction in basic sensitivity. Final consonant nasality had little effect in the classification experiment; in the identification experiment, nasal judgments were more likely when the following consonant was nasal.

[1]  John Kingston Integrating Articulations in the Perception of Vowel Height , 1991 .

[2]  S Hawkins,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal--nasal distinction for vowels. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  S. Maeda ACOUSTICS OF VOWEL NASALIZATION AND ARTICULATORY SHIFTS IN FRENCH NASAL VOWELS , 1993 .

[4]  J Kingston,et al.  Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: a detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B. Repp Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  N. I. Durlach,et al.  Intensity Perception. II. Resolution in One‐Interval Paradigms , 1972 .

[7]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[8]  W. Strange,et al.  Cross-language study of perception of the oral-nasal distinction. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S Hawkins,et al.  The influence of spectral prominence on perceived vowel quality. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J Kingston,et al.  Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[12]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[13]  John Kingston,et al.  Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection‐theoretic application of the Garner paradigm , 1995 .

[14]  N I Durlach,et al.  Notes and Comment Resolution in one dimension with random variations in background dimensions , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  C A Fowler,et al.  Coarticulatory influences on the perceived height of nasal vowels. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  K. Stevens,et al.  Some Acoustical and Perceptual Correlates of Nasal Vowels , 1987 .

[18]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[19]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns , 1987, Hearing Research.

[20]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.