Integrated MCDM for evaluating fashion design schemes

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop comprehensive criteria for evaluating fashion design schemes and used an integrated model which considers the interrelation between the clusters of evaluation and the influence between criteria for evaluating alternative fashion design schemes. Design/methodology/approach The integrated approach uses the advantages of all three methods: the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) can be used to analyse the interrelations between the major clusters of fashion design evaluation. The analytical network process can calculate the criterion weight that is adjusted based on the influence between different elements in the decision framework. The Visekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) determines the best fashion design by ranking a set of designs by using ten conflicting criteria. Findings Style is the decisive dimension because it is highly affected by other clusters. The comfort of the style is the most crucial criterion. “Veracious” is the best and most preferred design scheme. Originality/value The study develops the decisive cluster and criteria in designing a fashion design scheme. The proposed approach can be used as a decision analysis tool in fashion design and other fields and has various advantages (e.g. considering interrelations between clusters and influences between criteria, and ranking a set of alternatives), and therefore, is appropriate for practical circumstances.

[1]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[2]  Ch Lin,et al.  Combination of a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for fashion design scheme evaluation , 2012 .

[3]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Valerie Steele,et al.  Encyclopedia of clothing and fashion , 2005 .

[5]  T. Saaty,et al.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network , 2004 .

[6]  Chiahsu Lin,et al.  Application of fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to criteria weights for fashion design scheme evaluation , 2013 .

[7]  Nigan Bayazit,et al.  An Application of AHP in the Selection of Fashion Trends for Specific Target Groups , 2007 .

[8]  Chiahsu Lin Application of CFPR to fashion design scheme selection , 2014 .

[9]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[10]  Chiahsu Lin,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM for evaluating fashion trend alternatives , 2012 .

[11]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Leslie Davis Burns,et al.  Clothing Evaluative Criteria: A Cross-National Comparison of Taiwanese and United States Consumers , 2002 .

[13]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Jane E. Workman,et al.  Assessment of Creativity in Apparel Design , 1999 .