Response of Mouse Visual Cortical Neurons to Electric Stimulation of the Retina

Retinal prostheses strive to restore vision to the blind by electrically stimulating the neurons that survive the disease process. Clinical effectiveness has been limited however, and much ongoing effort is devoted toward the development of improved stimulation strategies, especially ones that better replicate physiological patterns of neural signaling. Here, to better understand the potential effectiveness of different stimulation strategies, we explore the responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex to electric stimulation of the retina. A 16-channel implantable microprobe was used to record single unit activities in vivo from each layer of the mouse visual cortex. Layers were identified by electrode depth as well as spontaneous rate. Cell types were classified as excitatory or inhibitory based on their spike waveform and as ON, OFF, or ON-OFF based on the polarity of their light response. After classification, electric stimulation was delivered via a wire electrode placed on the surface of cornea (extraocularly) and responses were recorded from the cortex contralateral to the stimulated eye. Responses to electric stimulation were highly similar across cell types and layers. Responses (spike counts) increased as a function of the amplitude of stimulation, and although there was some variance across cells, the sensitivity to amplitude was largely similar across all cell types. Suppression of responses was observed for pulse rates ≥3 pulses per second (PPS) but did not originate in the retina as RGC responses remained stable to rates up to 5 PPS. Low-frequency sinusoids delivered to the retina replicated the out-of-phase responses that occur naturally in ON vs. OFF RGCs. Intriguingly, out-of-phase signaling persisted in V1 neurons, suggesting key aspects of neural signaling are preserved during transmission along visual pathways. Our results describe an approach to evaluate responses of cortical neurons to electric stimulation of the retina. By examining the responses of single cells, we were able to show that some retinal stimulation strategies can indeed better match the neural signaling patterns used by the healthy visual system. Because cortical signaling is better correlated to psychophysical percepts, the ability to evaluate which strategies produce physiological-like cortical responses may help to facilitate better clinical outcomes.

[1]  C A Curcio,et al.  Preservation of ganglion cell layer neurons in age-related macular degeneration. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  M. Lavail,et al.  Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  J. Weiland,et al.  Retinotopic Responses in the Visual Cortex Elicited by Epiretinal Electrical Stimulation in Normal and Retinal Degenerate Rats , 2018, Translational vision science & technology.

[4]  Takao Hashimoto,et al.  A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  S. Fried,et al.  The response of retinal neurons to high-frequency stimulation , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Liming Li,et al.  Comparison of cortical responses to the activation of retina by visual stimulation and transcorneal electrical stimulation , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[7]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Visual cortex responses to suprachoroidal electrical stimulation of the retina: effects of electrode return configuration. , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Retinal prosthetic strategy with the capacity to restore normal vision , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  H. Jörntell,et al.  Ketamine and xylazine depress sensory-evoked parallel fiber and climbing fiber responses. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Wenzhi Sun,et al.  Identification of ON–OFF direction‐selective ganglion cells in the mouse retina , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Tianruo Guo,et al.  High-amplitude electrical stimulation can reduce elicited neuronal activity in visual prosthesis , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Farhad Hafezi,et al.  Temporal properties of visual perception on electrical stimulation of the retina. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  Shawn R. Olsen,et al.  Gain control by layer six in cortical circuits of vision , 2012, Nature.

[16]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Cortical activation following chronic passive implantation of a wide-field suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  William T. Newsome,et al.  Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction , 1990, Nature.

[18]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Characterization of neocortical principal cells and interneurons by network interactions and extracellular features. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. A. Neimark,et al.  Neural Correlates of Vibrissa Resonance Band-Pass and Somatotopic Representation of High-Frequency Stimuli , 2004, Neuron.

[20]  M. Stryker,et al.  Modulation of Visual Responses by Behavioral State in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[21]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  The Detection of Motion by Blind Subjects With the Epiretinal 60-Electrode (Argus II) Retinal Prosthesis. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[22]  Shelley Fried,et al.  The Retinal Response to Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Kaspar Heinrich Dipl I Osthaus,et al.  A method for generating , 1972 .

[24]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  High-Fidelity Reproduction of Spatiotemporal Visual Signals for Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, Neuron.

[25]  Donald K Eddington,et al.  Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Eriko Sugano,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2 gene transduced into retinal ganglion cells restores functional vision in genetically blind rats. , 2010, Experimental eye research.

[28]  Maesoon Im,et al.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  J. Morley,et al.  Stimulation of the retina with a multielectrode extraocular visual prosthesis , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[30]  James Weiland,et al.  Neural responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the retina. , 2006, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[31]  M. Wilms,et al.  Subretinal implantation and testing of polyimide film electrodes in cats , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[32]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[34]  Joseph F. Rizzo,et al.  Activation of retinal ganglion cells in wild-type and rd1 mice through electrical stimulation of the retinal neural network , 2008, Vision Research.

[35]  Jonathan D. Groth,et al.  Differential effects of ketamine/xylazine anesthesia on the cerebral and cerebellar cortical activities in the rat. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  G. J. Suaning,et al.  Focal activation of the feline retina via a suprachoroidal electrode array , 2009, Vision Research.

[37]  Maesoon Im,et al.  Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF retinal ganglion cells , 2015, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  Daniel K Freeman,et al.  Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[39]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[40]  U. Eysel,et al.  Cortical activation via an implanted wireless retinal prosthesis. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  Torfi Sigurdsson,et al.  Attenuation of Responses to Self-Generated Sounds in Auditory Cortical Neurons , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Seung Woo Lee,et al.  Implantable microcoils for intracortical magnetic stimulation , 2016, Science Advances.

[43]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Visual cortex responses to single- and simultaneous multiple-electrode stimulation of the retina: implications for retinal prostheses. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[45]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  Visual resolution with epi-retinal electrical stimulation estimated from activation profiles in cat visual cortex , 2003, Visual Neuroscience.

[46]  W. M. Keck,et al.  Highly Selective Receptive Fields in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Shelley I. Fried,et al.  Enhanced Control of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons With Micromagnetic Stimulation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[48]  R. Douglas,et al.  Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[49]  Kevin L. Briggman,et al.  Structural and functional diversity of a dense sample of retinal ganglion cells , 2017 .

[50]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  R. Masland,et al.  The Major Cell Populations of the Mouse Retina , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  B. Boycott Visual Physiology , 1973, Nature.

[53]  Shelley I. Fried,et al.  Visual and electric spiking responses of seven types of rabbit retinal ganglion cells , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[54]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS – Clinical trial interim report , 2015, Vision Research.

[55]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Oscillatory Coupling of Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells and Interneurons in the Behaving Rat , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  O Okubo [Visual evoked potential]. , 1989, No to hattatsu = Brain and development.

[57]  A. Sher,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of retinal response to network-mediated photovoltaic stimulation. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Genetic Reactivation of Cone Photoreceptors Restores Visual Responses in Retinitis Pigmentosa , 2010, Science.

[59]  A. Sher,et al.  Photovoltaic restoration of sight with high visual acuity , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[60]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  The functional diversity of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse , 2015, Nature.

[61]  Thomas Schanze,et al.  Implantation and testing of subretinal film electrodes in domestic pigs. , 2006, Experimental eye research.

[62]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Spatially Patterned Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Resolution of Retinal Prostheses , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Olivier Marre,et al.  Targeting channelrhodopsin-2 to ON-bipolar cells with vitreally administered AAV Restores ON and OFF visual responses in blind mice. , 2015, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[64]  R. Jensen,et al.  Responses of ganglion cells to repetitive electrical stimulation of the retina , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[65]  Randy M Bruno,et al.  Feedforward Mechanisms of Excitatory and Inhibitory Cortical Receptive Fields , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  J. Rizzo Update on Retinal Prosthetic Research: The Boston Retinal Implant Project , 2011, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[67]  John W. Morley,et al.  Development of an extraocular retinal prosthesis: Evaluation of stimulation parameters in the cat , 2008, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[68]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[69]  F. Werblin,et al.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[70]  Thomas Schanze,et al.  Visual resolution with retinal implants estimated from recordings in cat visual cortex , 2006, Vision Research.

[71]  Angelika Braun,et al.  Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[72]  H. Kishima,et al.  Testing of semichronically implanted retinal prosthesis by suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[73]  L. Peichl Retinal ganglion cells , 1988 .

[74]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  Cristopher M Niell,et al.  Cell types, circuits, and receptive fields in the mouse visual cortex. , 2015, Annual review of neuroscience.

[76]  P. Greenberg,et al.  Retinal implants: a systematic review , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[77]  N. Logothetis,et al.  The effects of electrical microstimulation on cortical signal propagation , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  W. Ridder,et al.  The visual evoked potential in the mouse—Origins and response characteristics , 2006, Vision Research.

[79]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[80]  E. Strettoi,et al.  Retinal Ganglion Cells Survive and Maintain Normal Dendritic Morphology in a Mouse Model of Inherited Photoreceptor Degeneration , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[81]  Yan T Wong,et al.  Neural Responses to Multielectrode Stimulation of Healthy and Degenerate Retina. , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[82]  D. Palanker,et al.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight , 2016, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[83]  L. Maffei,et al.  The visual physiology of the wild type mouse determined with pattern VEPs , 1999, Vision Research.

[84]  S. Fried,et al.  Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.