Dogs on the Street, Pumas on Your Feet: How Cues in the Environment Influence Product Evaluation and Choice

Abstract Little empirical research has examined the implicit effects of environmental cues on consumer behavior. Across six studies using a combination of field and laboratory methods, the authors find that products are more accessible, evaluated more favorably, and chosen more frequently when the surrounding environment contains more perceptually or conceptually related cues. The findings highlight the impact of frequent—in addition to recent—priming in shaping product evaluation and choice: More frequent exposure to perceptually or conceptually related cues increases product accessibility and makes the product easier to process. In turn, this increased accessibility influences product evaluation and choice, which are found to vary directly with the frequency of exposure to conceptually related cues. These results support the hypothesis that conceptual priming effects can have a strong impact on real-world consumer judgments.

[1]  F. Allport,et al.  Personality as a Pattern of Teleonomic Trends , 1941 .

[2]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[3]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[4]  Allan Collins,et al.  How to make a language user. , 1972 .

[5]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[6]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[7]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[8]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[9]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[10]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Implicit Learning and Generalization of the "Mere Exposure" Effect , 1983 .

[11]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[12]  P. O'Seaghdha.  The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy , 1990 .

[14]  P. Nedungadi.  Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations , 1990 .

[15]  Albert C. Bemmaor,et al.  Measuring the Short-Term Effect of In-Store Promotion and Retail Advertising on Brand Sales: A Factorial Experiment , 1991 .

[16]  Scott R. Beach,et al.  Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students , 1992 .

[17]  B. W. Whittlesea.  Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[18]  Chris Janiszewski.  Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects , 1993 .

[19]  Helen Moss,et al.  Birkbeck Word Association Norms , 1996 .

[20]  Adrian C. North,et al.  In-store music affects product choice , 1997, Nature.

[21]  P. Pietinen,et al.  Gender, socioeconomic status and family status as determinants of food behaviour. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[22]  L D Williams,et al.  Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[23]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[24]  Margery M. Lucas.  Context effects in lexical access: A meta-analysis , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  When an Ad's Influence Is beyond Our Conscious Control: Perceptual and Conceptual Fluency Effects Caused by Incidental Ad Exposure , 1999 .

[26]  W. E. Baker,et al.  When Can Affective Conditioning and Mere Exposure Directly Influence Brand Choice , 1999 .

[27]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Subliminal Mere Exposure: Specific, General, and Diffuse Effects , 2000, Psychological science.

[28]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[29]  C. Chiu,et al.  Multicultural minds. A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[30]  C. Chiu,et al.  Multicultural minds. A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. , 2000 .

[31]  J. Bargh,et al.  The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  R. Zajonc.  Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal , 2001 .

[33]  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. , 2001 .

[34]  J. Bargh,et al.  The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. , 2001 .

[35]  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. , 2001 .

[36]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  The Role of Affect in the Mere Exposure Effect: Evidence from Psychophysiological and Individual Differences Approaches , 2001 .

[37]  G. Rhodes,et al.  GENERALIZATION OF MERE EXPOSURE EFFECTS TO AVERAGED COMPOSITE FACES , 2001 .

[38]  Angela Y. Lee.  Effects of Implicit Memory on Memory-Based versus Stimulus-Based Brand Choice , 2002 .

[39]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Thinking of you: nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Luis C. Corchón,et al.  Addiction and Cue-Triggered Decision Processes. , 2004, The American economic review.

[41]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice , 2004 .

[42]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[43]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  In Defense of Consciousness: The Role of Conscious and Unconscious Inputs in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[44]  D. Wigboldus,et al.  The Unconscious Consumer: Effects of Environment on Consumer Behavior , 2005 .

[45]  Chip Heath,et al.  Idea Habitats: How the Prevalence of Environmental Cues Influences the Success of Ideas , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  M. Meredith,et al.  Can Where People Vote Influence How They Vote? The Influence of Polling Location Type on Voting Behavior , 2006 .

[47]  J. Bargh.  What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. , 2006, European journal of social psychology.

[48]  U. Simonsohn,et al.  Downloading Wisdom from Online Crowds , 2007 .

[49]  Jonah Berger,et al.  When the Same Prime Leads to Different Effects , 2007 .

[50]  A. Sela,et al.  Unraveling Priming: When Does the Same Prime Activate a Goal versus a Trait? , 2009 .

[51]  Veena Chattaraman,et al.  Identity salience and shifts in product preferences of Hispanic consumers: Cultural relevance of product attributes as a moderator , 2009 .

[52]  S. Lennon,et al.  The malleable bicultural consumer: effects of cultural contexts on aesthetic judgments , 2009 .

[53]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[54]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  The Conflicting Choices of Alternating Selves , 2010 .

[55]  R. Kronauer,et al.  Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 2022 .