Reinterpreting the LCA Standard Procedure for PSS

Abstract Product-Service Systems (PSS) are unveiling innovative business models by proposing profitable and eco-friendly solutions to address customer needs. In promoting PSS alternatives companies are shifting from a product-sale business model towards the delivering of a result to the end user, given by an integrated combination of tangible products and intangible services. Researches claim that such growing business paradigm has the potential to dematerialise the economy by reducing material flows in production and consumption, thus minimising the environmental impacts. However, several studies have demonstrated that sustainability is not an intrinsic element of PSS. As a matter of fact, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is the most renowned methodology to perform environmental assessments both of products and services. Nevertheless, the current LCA researches focus on the evaluation of physical products and lack in providing guidelines and frameworks for practitioners to perform the environmental assessment of PSS, which also consists of intangible elements. To address this gap, the paper aims at developing some guidelines in the form of a conceptual framework supporting LCA for PSS. The research is pursued following a systematic literature review on environmental assessment methods applied in the PSS domain along with the advice of several active researchers and experts in the field. Such conceptual framework has the intention to guide practitioners in overcoming the main challenges that have to be faced while developing an LCA for PSS and provides a solid contribution to the current literature.

[1]  R. Roy Sustainable product-service systems , 2000 .

[2]  Fabrice Mathieux,et al.  Contributions to eco-design of machine-to-machine product service systems: the example of waste glass collection , 2011 .

[3]  Minna Halme,et al.  Sustainability evaluation of European household services , 2006 .

[4]  T. Tanaka,et al.  Environmental impact of information and communication technologies including rebound effects , 2004, IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2004. Conference Record. 2004.

[5]  Tomohiko Sakao,et al.  Environmental and economic benefits of Integrated Product Service Offerings quantified with real business cases , 2014 .

[6]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle environmental impact of the Internet infrastructure in a university , 2003, IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2003..

[7]  Peggy Zwolinski,et al.  A protocol to perform usage oriented ecodesign , 2014 .

[8]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[9]  Jannick Højrup Schmidt,et al.  Challenges when evaluating Product/Service-Systems through Life Cycle Assessment , 2016 .

[10]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Lessons learned - Review of LCAs for ICT products and services , 2014, Comput. Ind..

[11]  Valérie Laforest,et al.  Investigating Sustainability Assessment Methods of Product-service Systems , 2015 .

[12]  Oksana Mont,et al.  Clarifying the Concept of Product-Service System , 2002 .

[13]  Daniel Brissaud,et al.  An integrated method for environmental assessment and ecodesign of ICT-based optimization services , 2014 .

[14]  A. Tukker Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet , 2004 .

[15]  E. Sundin,et al.  Making functional sales environmentally and economically beneficial through product remanufacturing , 2005 .

[16]  Michael Abramovici,et al.  PSS Sustainability Assessment and Monitoring Framework (PSS-SAM) – Case Study of a Multi-module PSS Solution☆ , 2014 .

[17]  H. Meier,et al.  Industrial Product-Service Systems—IPS2 , 2010 .