A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen

There are many ways of understanding, assessing and managing the unforeseen and (potential) surprises. The dominating one is the risk approach, based on risk conceptualisation, risk assessment and risk management, but there are also others, and in this paper we focus on two; ideas from the quality discourse and the use of the concept of mindfulness as interpreted in the studies of High Reliability Organisation (HRO). The main aim of the paper is to present a new integrated perspective, a new way of thinking, capturing all these approaches, which provides new insights as well as practical guidelines for how to understand, assess and manage the unforeseen and (potential) surprises in a practical operational setting.

[1]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[2]  Bo Bergman,et al.  A Robustness Approach to Reliability , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[3]  A. R. Crathorne,et al.  Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. , 1933 .

[4]  Charles A. Baylis,et al.  Mind and the World-Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. , 1930 .

[5]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the meaning of a black swan in a risk context , 2013 .

[6]  Terje Aven,et al.  The risk concept - historical and recent development trends , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Terje Aven,et al.  Practical implications of the new risk perspectives , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Bo Bergman,et al.  A Conceptualistic Pragmatism in a Risk Assessment Context , 2012 .

[9]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  A. Hopkins.  Issues in safety science , 2014 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[12]  A. Zauberman,et al.  The new economics , 1965 .

[13]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[14]  Terje Aven,et al.  A risk perspective supporting organizational efforts for achieving high reliability , 2014 .

[15]  Bo Bergman,et al.  Conceptualistic Pragmatism: A framework for Bayesian analysis? , 2008 .

[16]  Ortwin Renn.  Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[17]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, second edition , 2007 .

[18]  E. Rosa.  Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk , 1998 .

[19]  C. I. Lewis.  MIND AND THE WORLD ORDER. OUTLINE OF A THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1930 .

[20]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity , 1999 .

[21]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[22]  W. A. Shewhart,et al.  Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control , 1939 .

[23]  Terje Aven,et al.  On Some Recent Definitions and Analysis Frameworks for Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[25]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representation, Propagation, and Decision Issues in Risk Analysis Under Incomplete Probabilistic Information , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Jean-Christophe Le Coze,et al.  Outlines of a sensitising model for industrial safety assessment , 2013 .

[27]  P. Dent.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (2nd edition) , 2010 .