Remaining consistent with method? An analysis of grounded theory research in accounting

Purpose - The paper revisits the intellectual roots of grounded theory and aims to analyze the consistency of the method used in grounded theory research in accounting. About 23 papers are identified and analysed. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is an analytical review of the research literature. It uses four fundamental canons of grounded theory to analyze accounting research. Findings - Some accounting researchers who have used the label “grounded theory” for their research have misunderstood or not applied the core canons of grounded theory established by Glaser and Strauss and developed with diversity in other disciplines. Most claim to follow the specific approach of Strauss and Corbin, but the published research shows limited explication of method. Originality/value - Since Parker and Roffey in 1997, there has been no analysis and re-evaluation of the burgeoning academic accounting literature using grounded theory. While celebrating the growth of this research, the paper does raise concerns about the lack of consistency of grounded theory research in accounting with the central canons of grounded theory, and it provides some directions for future grounded theory research by encouraging accounting researchers who wish to use grounded theory to engage more strongly in understanding the method and providing transparent explanations of their data collection and analysis methods.

[1]  L. Parker Budgetary incrementalism in a Christian bureaucracy , 2002 .

[2]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[3]  A. Goddard Accounting and NPM in UK Local Government - Contributions Towards Governance and Accountability , 2005 .

[4]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[5]  Malcolm Smith,et al.  Research Methods in Accounting , 2003 .

[6]  R. Barker The market for information—evidence from finance directors, analysts and fund managers , 1998 .

[7]  J. Morse Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods , 1993 .

[8]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF CORPORATE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE - OPPORTUNISM, RITUALISM, POLICIES, AND PROCESSES , 1990 .

[9]  Michael Burawoy,et al.  Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis , 1991 .

[10]  L. Parker Financial Management Strategy in a Community Welfare Organisation: A Boardroom Perspective , 2003 .

[11]  R. Scapens Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods , 1990 .

[12]  J. Meyrick What is Good Qualitative Research? , 2006, Journal of health psychology.

[13]  A. Goddard Budgetary practices and accountability habitus , 2004 .

[14]  T. Hopper,et al.  Management control, culture and ethnicity in a Chinese Indonesian company , 2007 .

[15]  T. Hopper,et al.  MAKING SENSE OF RESEARCH INTO THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING: A REVIEW OF ITS UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS [1] , 1985 .

[16]  Gweneth Norris,et al.  CHALK AND CHEESE: GROUNDED THEORY CASE STUDIES OF THE INTRODUCTION AND USAGE OF ACTIVITY-BASED INFORMATION IN TWO BRITISH BANKS , 2002 .

[17]  J. Benoliel Grounded Theory and Nursing Knowledge , 1996 .

[18]  B. Turner,et al.  Grounded Theory and Organizational Research , 1986 .

[19]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[20]  Christina Goulding Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers , 2002 .

[21]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[22]  Anna Buehring,et al.  Evaluating Qualitative Management Research: Towards a Contingent Criteriology , 2006 .

[23]  John Holland,et al.  A grounded theory of corporate disclosure , 2005 .

[24]  Karen Locke Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[25]  Malcolm Williams New strategies in social research , 2006 .

[26]  L. Parker Reactive planning in a Christian Bureaucracy , 2001 .

[27]  Regine Slagmulder,et al.  Using Management Control Systems to Achieve Alignment Between Strategic Investment Decisions and Strategy , 1997 .

[28]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  The budgetary process of power and politics , 1986 .

[29]  P. Stern Grounded theory methodology: its uses and processes. , 1980, Image.

[30]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middle‐range” thinking , 1995 .

[31]  T. Hines,et al.  We're off to see the wizard An evaluation of directors' and auditors' experiences with the Financial Reporting Review Panel , 2001 .

[32]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[33]  Jeremy F. Dent Accounting and organizational cultures: A field study of the emergence of a new organizational reality , 1991 .

[34]  Barbara Czarniawska-Joerges DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROL: THE CASE OF BEROL KEMI AB. , 1988 .

[35]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  The future of interpretive accounting research-A polyphonic debate , 2008 .

[36]  H. Heath,et al.  Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. , 2004, International journal of nursing studies.

[37]  T. Hopper,et al.  Japanese cost management meets Sri Lankan politics: Disappearance and reappearance of bureaucratic management controls in a privatised utility , 2004 .

[38]  J. Solomon,et al.  Private social, ethical and environmental disclosure , 2006 .

[39]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  DIALECTIC TENSION, DOUBLE REFLEXIVITY AND THE EVERYDAY ACCOUNTING RESEARCHER: ON USING... , 1990 .

[40]  J. Innes,et al.  Managers’ views on ABC in an insurance company: A grounded theory case study , 2002 .

[41]  J. Orton From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data , 1997 .

[42]  Joanne Locke,et al.  Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics , 2005 .

[43]  A. Goddard,et al.  Accounting and navigating legitimacy in Tanzanian NGOs , 2006 .

[44]  B. Glaser More grounded theory methodology : a reader , 1994 .

[45]  R. Greenhalgh Information and the transnational SME controller , 2000 .

[46]  A. Abdul-Rahman,et al.  An Interpretive Inquiry of Accounting Practices in Religious Organisations , 1998 .

[47]  Merilyn Annells,et al.  Grounded Theory Method: Philosophical Perspectives, Paradigm of Inquiry, and Postmodernism , 1996 .

[48]  L. Parker,et al.  Methodological themes: Back to the drawing board: revisiting grounded theory and the everyday accountant’s and manager’s reality , 1997 .

[49]  Sue Llewellyn,et al.  Working in hermeneutic circles in management accounting research: some implications and applications , 1993 .

[50]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[51]  Jaakko Kuorikoski,et al.  Straddling between paradigms: A naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting , 2008 .

[52]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[53]  Werner Bruggeman,et al.  The impact of technological change on management accounting , 1995 .

[54]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 1994 .

[55]  Hector Perera,et al.  The evolution of accruals‐based Crown (government) financial statements in New Zealand , 2005 .

[56]  M. Lightbody Storing and shielding: financial management behaviour in a church organization , 2000 .

[57]  Marianne McCarthy,et al.  Dimensional Analysis: Broadening the Conception of Grounded Theory , 1996 .

[58]  R. Suddaby From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[59]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Budgeting as a means for control and loose coupling , 1983 .

[60]  Joanne Lye,et al.  Grounded theory : a theory discovery method for accounting research. , 2006 .

[61]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[62]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: An historically informed field study , 1988 .