Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
暂无分享,去创建一个
P A Vanrolleghem | U Jeppsson | M-N Pons | I Nopens | J Alex | J B Copp | K V Gernaey | C Rosen | J-P Steyer | K. Gernaey | P. Vanrolleghem | C. Rosen | J. Steyer | M. Pons | I. Nopens | U. Jeppsson | J. Alex | J. Copp
[1] W. Gujer,et al. Activated sludge model No. 3 , 1995 .
[2] Ulf Jeppsson,et al. Plant-wide (BSM2) evaluation of the effect of reject water treatment with a SHARON-Anammox process , 2006 .
[3] P A Vanrolleghem,et al. Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[4] L Benedetti,et al. Benchmarking of WWTP design by assessing costs, effluent quality and process variability. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[5] R. Otterpohl,et al. Dynamic Models for Clarifiers of Activated Sludge Plants with Dry and Wet Weather Flows , 1992 .
[6] P A Vanrolleghem,et al. Plant-wide (BSM2) evaluation of reject water treatment with a SHARON-Anammox process. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[7] P A Vanrolleghem,et al. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[8] Sylvie Gillot,et al. The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual , 2001 .
[9] Irini Angelidaki,et al. Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1) , 2002 .
[10] K V Gernaey,et al. Application of multivariable statistical techniques in plant-wide WWTP control strategies analysis. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[11] Ulf Jeppsson,et al. Towards an ASM1 – ADM1 state variable interface for plant-wide wastewater treatment modeling , 2003 .
[12] Ulf Jeppsson,et al. Implementing ADM1 for benchmark simulations in Matlab/Simulink , 2005 .
[13] I. Takács. A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .
[14] S Winkler,et al. Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part 1: sensor property investigation and classification. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[15] Ulf Jeppsson,et al. The COST benchmark simulation model—current state and future perspective , 2004 .
[16] R. C. Weast. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .
[17] Ulf Jeppsson,et al. Aspects on ADM1 Implementation within the BSM2 Framework , 2005 .
[18] U Jeppsson,et al. Benchmark simulation Model no 2 in Matlab-simulink: towards plant-wide WWTP control strategy evaluation. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[19] W. M. Haynes. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1990 .
[20] U Jeppsson,et al. WWTP dynamic disturbance modelling--an essential module for long-term benchmarking development. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[21] Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al. Towards a simulation-benchmark for evaluating respirometry-based control strategies , 1997 .
[22] Ulf Jeppsson,et al. BSM1 versus BSM1_LT: Is the Control Strategy Performance Ranking Maintained? , 2007 .
[23] Ulf Jeppsson,et al. Phenomenological modelling of wastewater treatment plant influent disturbance scenarios , 2005 .