Banking on a Bad Bet

Probability matching is the tendency to match choice probabilities to outcome probabilities in a binary prediction task. This tendency is a long-standing puzzle in the study of decision making under risk and uncertainty, because always predicting the more probable outcome across a series of trials (maximizing) would yield greater predictive accuracy and payoffs. In three experiments, we tied the predominance of probability matching over maximizing to a generally adaptive cognitive operation that generates expectations regarding the aggregate outcomes of an upcoming sequence of events. Under conditions designed to diminish the generation or perceived applicability of such expectations, we found that the frequency of probability-matching behavior dropped substantially and maximizing became the norm.

[1]  J. Polt,et al.  Correction vs. noncorrection with changing reinforcement schedules. , 1958, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  Rollin Ar,et al.  Two-choice behavior of rhesus monkeys in a noncontingent situation. , 1959 .

[3]  Two-choice behavior of rhesus monkeys in a noncontingent situation. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  P. Derks,et al.  Simple strategies in binary prediction by children and adults. , 1967 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[7]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[8]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  Searching for patterns in random sequences. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[11]  Christoph Kogler,et al.  Dual process theories: A key for understanding the diversification bias? , 2007 .

[12]  M. Bar The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  D. Koehler,et al.  Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: Intuition versus deliberation , 2009, Cognition.

[14]  Greta James,et al.  Probability matching and strategy availability , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Associative processes in intuitive judgment , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.