The population biology of invaders

It is shown that invading species are most likely to establish where levels of competition among the resident species are lowest. Thus, of the higher trophic levels, herbivores are more likely to establish than carnivores or detritivores. Invading plants are most likely to establish in communities where the average level of cover is low. Competition is certainly not the only important process involved in establishment, however. Analysis of invasions by insects released as biocontrol agents against weeds, where exploitation and interference are likely to be negligible, show that the probability of successful establishment is closely related to the insect's intrinsic rate of increase. The main biological causes of failure are generalist predators, with parasites and diseases rather less important. For herbivorous insects, host-plant incompatibility is a major cause of failure in establishment. A general model for the dynamics of an invading species is proposed, which stresses: (a), the importance of distinguishing explicitly between exploitation and interference competition; (b), the potential importance of generalist natural enemies; (c), the role of mutualists; (d), the importance of refuges of various kinds in affecting the probability of establishment. Examples are provided to emphasize how far we still are from real, predictive ability in relation to the likely success of proposed or anticipated invasions.

[1]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  GENERALIST AND SPECIALIST NATURAL ENEMIES IN INSECT PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS , 1986 .

[2]  J. Gurevitch Competition and the Local Distribution of the Grass Stipa Neomexicana , 1986 .

[3]  D. Tonkyn Predator-mediated mutualism: Theory and tests in the homoptera , 1986 .

[4]  V. Loeschcke Coevolution and Invasion in Competitive Guilds , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[5]  J. J. Gilbert,et al.  Body Size, Food Concentration, and Population Growth in Planktonic Rotifers , 1985 .

[6]  D. Boucher The Biology of mutualism :: ecology and evolution , 1985 .

[7]  R. Vance The Stable Coexistence of Two Competitors for One Resource , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[8]  S. Gardner,et al.  Plant structure and the foraging success of Aphidius rhopalosiphi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) , 1985 .

[9]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Effects of reduced perch-height separation on competition between two Anolis lizards , 1985 .

[10]  D. Davidson An Experimental Study of Diffuse Competition in Harvester Ants , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[11]  D. Davidson,et al.  Granivory in the Chihuahuan Desert : interactions within and between trophic levels , 1985 .

[12]  D. Pimentel,et al.  NEW APPROACH FOR SELECTING BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS , 1984, The Canadian Entomologist.

[13]  M. Crawley Herbivory: the Dynamics of Animal-plant Interactions , 1984 .

[14]  W. Lampert,et al.  Competitive Ability of Differently Sized Daphnia Species: An Experimental Test , 1984 .

[15]  P. Grant,et al.  Darwin's Finches (Geospiza) On Isla Daphne Major, Galapagos: Breeding and Feeding Ecology in a Climatically Variable Environment , 1984 .

[16]  John D. Rummel,et al.  Some differences between invasion-structured and coevolution-structured competitive communities: a preliminary theoretical analysis , 1983 .

[17]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Coexistence of Competitors in Patchy Environment , 1983 .

[18]  M. J. Crawley,et al.  Survivorship of the sexual and agamic generations of Andricus quercuscalicis on Quercus cerris and Q.robur , 1983 .

[19]  H. Braune Effect of the structure of the host egg-mass on the effectiveness of an egg parasite of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) , 1982 .

[20]  Ted J. Case,et al.  Coevolution in resource-limited competition communities , 1982 .

[21]  I. Hanski Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment with and without predation , 1981 .

[22]  Michael Turelli,et al.  Niche overlap and invasion of competitors in random environments I. Models without demographic stochasticity , 1981 .

[23]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  Competition on a Divided and Ephemeral Resource: A Simulation Model , 1981 .

[24]  Roy M. Anderson,et al.  The Population Dynamics of Microparasites and Their Invertebrate Hosts , 1981 .

[25]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[26]  M. Hassell,et al.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[27]  P. Rawlings,et al.  Polymorphism in Cepaea: A Problem with Too Many Solutions? , 1977 .

[28]  Robert M. May,et al.  Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications , 1977 .

[29]  J. Roughgarden Resource partitioning among competing species--a coevolutionary approach. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[30]  I. Noy-Meir,et al.  Stability of Grazing Systems: An Application of Predator-Prey Graphs , 1975 .

[31]  R. May,et al.  Aggregation of Predators and Insect Parasites and its Effect on Stability , 1974 .

[32]  V. Gelder,et al.  The Serengeti Lion , 1973 .

[33]  R. B. Root Organization of a Plant-Arthropod Association in Simple and Diverse Habitats: The Fauna of Collards (Brassica Oleracea) , 1973 .

[34]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  D. Pimentel Introducing Parasites and Predators to Control Native Pests , 1963, The Canadian Entomologist.

[36]  A. P. Arthur Influence of Host Tree on Abundance of Itoplectis conquisitor (Say) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a Polyphagous Parasite of the European Pine Shoot Moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) , 1962, The Canadian Entomologist.

[37]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[38]  C. Huffaker,et al.  A Ten-Year Study of Vegetational Changes Associated with Biological Control of Klamath Weed. , 1959 .

[39]  A. C. Crombie On competition between different species of graminivorous insects , 1945, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[40]  K. Warington,et al.  The weed seed population of arable soil 1. Numerical estimation of viable seeds and observations on their natural dormancy. , 1930 .

[41]  I. Hanski Colonization of ephemeral habitats , 1987 .

[42]  V. C. Moran,et al.  The biological control of cactus weeds: achievements and prospects. , 1984 .

[43]  A. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolution and pollution , 1981 .

[44]  J. T.R. Sharrock,et al.  The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland , 1980 .

[45]  S. Louda,et al.  Biotic Interference with Insects Imported for Weed Control , 1976 .

[46]  P. S. Messenger PARASITES, PREDATORS, AND POPULATION DYNAMICS , 1975 .

[47]  G. Schaller The Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator-Prey Relations , 1972 .

[48]  G. Varley,et al.  Recent Advances in Insect Population Dynamics , 1970 .

[49]  H. S. Marshall,et al.  Wild Orchids of Britain , 1968 .