How to Use Five Letterforms to Gauge a Typeface's Personality: A Research-Driven Method

Technical communicators need to select typefaces that match the tone that they intend for a document. Rather than relying on intuition or personal preference, technical communicators can use a research-driven approach to analyze objectively the extent to which a typeface's personality meshes with the intended tone of a document. This study describes how technical communicators can analyze a typeface's uppercase J and its lowercase a, g, e, and n letterforms—letterforms that are dense with anatomical information—to gauge the extent to which a typeface will contribute a friendly or a professional personality to a document. Technical communicators—both professionals and students—who are armed with this knowledge can move beyond “safe” typefaces like Times New Roman and Helvetica, selecting instead typefaces whose anatomical features generate different kinds of personalities.

[1]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  Resolving the directness dilemma in document review sessions with nonnative speakers , 2003 .

[2]  Jo Mackiewicz.  What Technical Writing Students Should Know about Typeface Personality , 2004 .

[3]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  The Technical Editor as Diplomat: Linguistic Strategies for Balancing Clarity and Politeness , 2003 .

[4]  Camille L. Rowe.  The connotative dimensions of selected display typefaces , 1982 .

[5]  Sue Walker.  Typography and language in everyday life: prescriptions and practices , 2000 .

[6]  E. Brumberger,et al.  The Rhetoric of Typography: The Persona of Typeface and Text , 2003 .

[7]  J. Mackiewicz,et al.  The effects of tutor expertise in engineering writing: a linguistic analysis of writing tutors' comments , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[8]  David D. Roberts,et al.  Designing Visual Language: Strategies for Professional Communicators , 1997 .

[9]  Kenneth W. Houp.  Reporting Technical Information , 1984 .

[10]  Jo Mackiewicz.  What technical writing students do know and should know about typography , 2003, IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings..

[11]  Human Subjects Research by Business Students: Beyond the Red Tape , 2003 .

[12]  James Craig,et al.  Designing with type: A basic course in typography , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[13]  Robin Williams,et al.  The Non-Designer's Type Book: Insights and Techniques for Creating Professional-Level Type , 1998 .

[14]  E. Brumberger,et al.  The Rhetoric of Typography: Effects on Reading Time, Reading Comprehension, and Perceptions of Ethos , 2004 .

[15]  E. Brumberger,et al.  The rhetoric of typography: The awareness and impact of typeface appropriateness , 2003 .

[16]  Bob Gordon.  Making Digital Type Look Good , 2001 .

[17]  C. Burt,et al.  A Psychological Study of Typography , 1959 .

[18]  Peter Walker,et al.  Predicting the appropriateness of a typeface on the basis of its multi-modal features , 1986 .

[19]  Jo Mackiewicz.  The State of Online Writing Labs: Have They Fulfilled Their Potential? , 2005 .

[20]  William Sanborn Pfeiffer.  Pocket guide to technical writing , 1997 .