Functional assessment of control systems for cybernetic elbow prostheses. I. Description of the technique

For Pt II see ibid. vol. 37, no. 11. pp. 1037-1047, Nov. 1990). A novel control scheme by which an amputee commands an elbow prosthesis using myoelectric activity is presented. By mimicking some important characteristics of the intact neuromuscular system, the proposed controller attempts to make the prosthesis respond as the natural elbow to both voluntary commands from the amputee and applied moments from the environment. Also presented is a description of a novel experiment for functionally assessing elbow prosthesis controllers. The experimental design calls for an amputee to perform a constrained motion task while operating a prosthesis capable of implementing a wide variety of controllers. Due to the nature of the constraint, the task emphasizes the prosthesis response to both inputs: voluntary commands and external moments.

[1]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Functional organization of the motor process underlying the transition from movement to posture , 1981, Brain Research.

[2]  N Hogan,et al.  A review of the methods of processing EMG for use as a proportional control signal. , 1976, Biomedical engineering.

[3]  P. Neilson Speed of response or bandwidth of voluntary system controlling elbow position in intact man , 1972, Medical and biological engineering.

[4]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. D. Cooke,et al.  Dependence of human arm movements on limb mechanical properties , 1979, Brain Research.

[6]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Vicario,et al.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments , 1978, Experimental brain research.

[9]  Amos Freedy,et al.  System integration of pattern recognition, adaptive aided, upper limb prostheses , 1977 .

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R B Jerard,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of a unified theory for simultaneous multiple axis artificial arm control. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  J. Kelso,et al.  Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Wilson Ab Limb Prosthetics —1970 , 1970 .

[14]  Aaron Sl,et al.  Comparison of an EMG-controlled prosthesis and the normal human biceps brachii muscle. , 1976 .

[15]  LeBlanc Ma Clinical evaluation of externally powered prosthetic elbows. , 1971 .

[16]  G. Rollman,et al.  Electrocutaneous stimulation: Psychometric functions and temporal integration , 1969 .

[17]  Neville Hogan,et al.  An Emulator System for Developing Improved Elbow-Prosthesis Designs , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Bradley L Hunter Design of a self-contained, active, regenerative computer controlled above-knee prosthesis , 1981 .

[20]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[21]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[22]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  What muscle variable(s) does the nervous system control in limb movements? , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  J. Houk,et al.  Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance control of industrial robots , 1984 .

[26]  Shpitsberg Vl Dissociation and reassociation of human erythrocyte catalase , 1966 .

[27]  D R Broome,et al.  A TOTAL HYDRAULICALLY POWERED PROSTHETIC ARM SYSTEM , 1974 .

[28]  S. D. Reimers,et al.  Kinesthetic Sensing for the EMG Controlled "Boston Arm" , 1970 .

[29]  Robert W. Mann,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part I: Derivation of the Optimal Myoprocessor , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  D. S. Alles,et al.  Information Transmission by Phantom Sensations , 1970 .

[31]  R B Stein,et al.  New approaches for the control of powered prostheses particularly by high-level amputees. , 1980, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[32]  Neville Hogan,et al.  PROSTHESES SHOULD HAVE ADAPTIVELY CONTROLLABLE IMPEDANCE , 1982 .

[33]  Richard T. Johnson,et al.  Development of the Utah Artificial Arm , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  C. Ghez,et al.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  Carlo J. De Luca Control of upper-limb prostheses: a case for neuroelectric control. , 1978 .

[37]  Lawrence A. Wood,et al.  Some Relations Between Stress, Strain, and Temperature in a Pure‐Gum Vulcanizate of GR‐S Synthetic Rubber , 1944 .

[38]  K. J. Hayes,et al.  Wave analyses of tissue noise and muscle action potentials. , 1960, Journal of applied physiology.

[39]  E. Taub,et al.  Deafferentation in monkeys: Pointing at a target without visual feedback , 1975, Experimental Neurology.

[40]  P. Rack,et al.  The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Mechanical properties of muscles: Implications for motor control , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.