The human body odor compound androstadienone leads to anger-dependent effects in an emotional Stroop but not dot-probe task using human faces

The androgen derivative androstadienone is a substance found in human sweat and thus is a putative human chemosignal. Androstadienone has been studied with respect to effects on mood states, attractiveness ratings, physiological and neural activation. With the current experiment, we aimed to explore in which way androstadienone affects attention to social cues (human faces). Moreover, we wanted to test whether effects depend on specific emotions, the participants' sex and individual sensitivity to smell androstadienone. To do so, we investigated 56 healthy individuals (thereof 29 females taking oral contraceptives) with two attention tasks on two consecutive days (once under androstadienone, once under placebo exposure in pseudorandomized order). With an emotional dot-probe task we measured visuo-spatial cueing while an emotional Stroop task allowed us to investigate interference control. Our results suggest that androstadienone acts in a sex, task and emotion-specific manner as a reduction in interference processes in the emotional Stroop task was only apparent for angry faces in men under androstadienone exposure. More specifically, men showed a smaller difference in reaction times for congruent compared to incongruent trials. At the same time also women were slightly affected by smelling androstadienone as they classified angry faces more often correctly under androstadienone. For the emotional dot-probe task no modulation by androstadienone was observed. Furthermore, in both attention paradigms individual sensitivity to androstadienone was neither correlated with reaction times nor error rates in men and women. To conclude, exposure to androstadienone seems to potentiate the relevance of angry faces in both men and women in connection with interference control, while processes of visuo-spatial cueing remain unaffected.

[1]  David W. Kern,et al.  A human chemosignal modulates frontolimbic activity and connectivity in response to emotional stimuli , 2017, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[2]  C. Lamm,et al.  Attentional biases in healthy adults: Exploring the impact of temperament and gender. , 2016, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[3]  Ellen Leibenluft,et al.  Behavioral and neural stability of attention bias to threat in healthy adolescents , 2016, NeuroImage.

[4]  Renlai Zhou,et al.  Gender Differences in Emotional Response: Inconsistency between Experience and Expressivity , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  B. Turetsky,et al.  The influence of androstadienone during psychosocial stress is modulated by gender, trait anxiety and subjective stress: An fMRI study , 2016, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[6]  S. Delplanque,et al.  Androstadienone’s influence on the perception of facial and vocal attractiveness is not sex specific , 2016, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[7]  Jessica Freiherr,et al.  The Influence of Menstrual Cycle and Androstadienone on Female Stress Reactions: An fMRI Study , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  M. Kret,et al.  Anger fosters action. Fast responses in a motor task involving approach movements toward angry faces and bodies , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Greg J Siegle,et al.  Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research. , 2015, Psychological assessment.

[10]  T. Wyatt,et al.  The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  U. Sailer,et al.  Sex differences in event-related potentials and attentional biases to emotional facial stimuli , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[12]  D. Wentura,et al.  What Happens during the Stimulus Onset Asynchrony in the Dot-Probe Task? Exploring the Role of Eye Movements in the Assessment of Attentional Biases , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  D. Weissman,et al.  Congruency sequence effects are driven by previous-trial congruency, not previous-trial response conflict , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[14]  D. Pfabigan,et al.  Happy and angry faces: Subclinical levels of anxiety are differentially related to attentional biases in men and women , 2013 .

[15]  M L Phillips,et al.  Gender Differences in the Sensitivity to Negative Stimuli: Cross-Modal Affective Priming Study☆ , 2013, European Psychiatry.

[16]  Monique A M Smeets,et al.  Chemosignals Communicate Human Emotions , 2012, Psychological science.

[17]  Anette Kersting,et al.  Women's Greater Ability to Perceive Happy Facial Emotion Automatically: Gender Differences in Affective Priming , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  D. Veltman,et al.  Heterosexual Men and Women Both Show a Hypothalamic Response to the Chemo-Signal Androstadienone , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  P. Pauli,et al.  Androstadienone in Motor Reactions of Men and Women toward Angry Faces , 2012, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  Ute Habel,et al.  Brain Circuitries Involved in Semantic Interference by Demands of Emotional and Non-Emotional Distractors , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  Jessica Freiherr,et al.  The 40-item Monell Extended Sniffin’ Sticks Identification Test (MONEX-40) , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  U. Castiello,et al.  Subliminally Perceived Odours Modulate Female Intrasexual Competition: An Eye Movement Study , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  Christian Grillon,et al.  In the face of fear: anxiety sensitizes defensive responses to fearful faces. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[24]  F. Petermann Frankfurter Aufmerksamkeits-­Inventar 2 (FAIR-2) , 2011 .

[25]  S. Stevens,et al.  Eye movement assessment in individuals with social phobia: differential usefulness for varying presentation times? , 2011, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[26]  Andrew B. L. Berry,et al.  A tale of two negatives: differential memory modulation by threat-related facial expressions. , 2011, Emotion.

[27]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[28]  F. Graeff,et al.  Effects of sex hormonal levels and phases of the menstrual cycle in the processing of emotional faces , 2009, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[29]  M. McClintock,et al.  Putative human pheromone androstadienone attunes the mind specifically to emotional information , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.

[30]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  Evidence that androstadienone, a putative human chemosignal, modulates women’s attributions of men’s attractiveness , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[31]  U. Habel,et al.  Emotion recognition accuracy in healthy young females is associated with cycle phase , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[32]  G. Crombez,et al.  A time-course analysis of attentional cueing by threatening scenes. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[33]  M. Kindt,et al.  Selective attention and threat: quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task. , 2007, Behaviour research and therapy.

[34]  M. Bushnell,et al.  The effects of the steroid androstadienone and pleasant odorants on the mood and pain perception of men and women , 2007, European journal of pain.

[35]  E. Kandel,et al.  Resolving Emotional Conflict: A Role for the Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Modulating Activity in the Amygdala , 2006, Neuron.

[36]  J. Lundström,et al.  Subthreshold amounts of social odorant affect mood, but not behavior, in heterosexual women when tested by a male, but not a female, experimenter , 2005, Biological Psychology.

[37]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  T. Egner,et al.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  G. Crombez,et al.  Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. , 2004, Behaviour research and therapy.

[40]  Karin Mogg,et al.  BRIEF REPORT Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: Testing the vigilance‐avoidance hypothesis , 2004 .

[41]  Johan N Lundström,et al.  Psychological effects of subthreshold exposure to the putative human pheromone 4,16-androstadien-3-one , 2003, Hormones and Behavior.

[42]  M. Bensafi,et al.  Sniffing human sex-steroid derived compounds modulates mood, memory and autonomic nervous system function in specific behavioral contexts , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[43]  T. Hummel,et al.  Individual differences in sensitivity to the odor of 4,16-androstadien-3-one. , 2003, Chemical senses.

[44]  N. Ambady,et al.  Effects of Gaze on Amygdala Sensitivity to Anger and Fear Faces , 2003, Science.

[45]  M. McClintock,et al.  Context-dependent effects of steroid chemosignals on human physiology and mood , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[46]  L. Monti-Bloch,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of androstadienone, a human pheromone , 2000, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[47]  M. McClintock,et al.  Psychological State and Mood Effects of Steroidal Chemosignals in Women and Men , 2000, Hormones and Behavior.

[48]  K. Mogg,et al.  Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[49]  K. T. Holland,et al.  Comparison of 16-Androstene steroid concentrations in sterile apocrine sweat and axillary secretions: Interconversions of 16-Androstenes by the axillary microflora—a mechanism for axillary odour production in man? , 1994, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[50]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  R. Bagby,et al.  Validation of the Alexithymia Construct: A Measurement-Based Approach * , 1990, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[52]  M. Biaggio Sex Differences in Behavioral Reactions to Provocation of Anger , 1989, Psychological reports.

[53]  A. Mallet,et al.  Simultaneous quantification of five odorous steroids (16-androstenes) in the axillary hair of men. , 1988, Journal of steroid biochemistry.

[54]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[55]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[56]  Jessica Freiherr,et al.  You Smell Dangerous: Communicating Fight Responses Through Human Chemosignals of Aggression. , 2016, Chemical senses.

[57]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Smelling chemosensory signals of males in anxious versus nonanxious condition increases state anxiety of female subjects. , 2011, Chemical senses.

[58]  Franz Petermann,et al.  Beck-Depressions-Inventar Revision (BDI–II) , 2010 .

[59]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  H. Wittchen,et al.  Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview (und Fragebogen) für DSM-IV (SKID-II), Achse II (Persönlichkeitsstörungen). Eine deutschsprachige, erweiterte Bearbeitung der amerikanischen Originalversion des SCID-II von: M.B. First, R.L. Spitzer, M. Gibbon, J.B.W. Williams, L. Benjamin (Version 3/96) , 1996 .

[61]  R. Reitan Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration and Scoring , 1992 .

[62]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[63]  N. Sobel,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Human Tears Contain a Chemosignal , 2022 .