Quantum structures: An attempt to explain the origin of their appearance in nature

We explain quantum structure as due to two effects: (a) a real change of state of the entity under the influence of the measurement and (b) a lack of knowledge about a deeper deterministic reality of the measurement process. We present a quantum machine, with which we can illustrate in a simple way how the quantum structure arises as a consequence of the two mentioned effects. We introduce a parameter ε that measures the size of the lack of knowledge of the measurement process, and by varying this parameter, we describe a continuous evolution from a quantum structure (maximal lack of knowledge) to a classical structure (zero lack of knowledge). We show that for intermediate values of ε we find a new type of structure that is neither quantum nor classical. We apply the model to situations of lack of knowledge about the measurement process appearing in other aspects of reality. Specifically, we investigate the quantumlike structures that appear in the situation of psychological decision processes, where the subject is influenced during the testing and forms some opinions during the testing process. Our conclusion is that in the light of this explanation, the quantum probabilities are epistemic and not ontological, which means that quantum mechanics is compatible with a determinism of the whole.

[1]  Gérard G. Emch,et al.  Mathematical and conceptual foundations of 20th-century physics , 1984 .

[2]  D. J. Foulis,et al.  The Operational Approach to Quantum Mechanics , 1978 .

[3]  B. Coecke Generalization of the proof on the existence of hidden measurements to experiments with an infinite set of outcomes , 1995 .

[4]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A physical example of quantum fuzzy sets, and the classical limit. , 1993 .

[5]  I. Segal Postulates for General Quantum Mechanics , 1947 .

[6]  I. Pitowsky Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic , 1989 .

[7]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Logic of Quantum Mechanics , 1936 .

[8]  C. Piron,et al.  On the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 1976 .

[9]  B. Coecke Hidden measurement model for pure and mixed states of quantum physics in Euclidean space , 1995 .

[10]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Origin of the Non-Classical Character of the Quantum Probability Model , 1987 .

[11]  A. Messiah Quantum Mechanics , 1961 .

[12]  Stanley Gudder,et al.  Realistic quantum probability , 1988 .

[13]  B. Coecke A hidden measurement representation for quantum entities described by finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces , 1995 .

[14]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structures, separated physical entities and probability , 1994 .

[15]  C. H. Randall,et al.  Operational Statistics. I. Basic Concepts , 1972 .

[16]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Mechanistic classical laboratory situation with a quantum logic structure , 1992 .

[17]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Applications of Quantum Statistics in Psychological Studies of Decision Processes , 1995 .

[18]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum, classical and intermediate: a measurement model , 1994 .

[19]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics , 1986 .

[20]  R. Morrow,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1968 .

[21]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum, classical and intermediate: An illustrative example , 1994 .

[22]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structures in macroscopic reality , 1993 .

[23]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum mechanics , 1982 .