Rapid communication: Global–local processing affects recognition of distractor emotional faces

Recent studies have shown links between happy faces and global, distributed attention as well as sad faces to local, focused attention. Emotions have been shown to affect global–local processing. Given that studies on emotion–cognition interactions have not explored the effect of perceptual processing at different spatial scales on processing stimuli with emotional content, the present study investigated the link between perceptual focus and emotional processing. The study investigated the effects of global–local processing on the recognition of distractor faces with emotional expressions. Participants performed a digit discrimination task with digits at either the global level or the local level presented against a distractor face (happy or sad) as background. The results showed that global processing associated with broad scope of attention facilitates recognition of happy faces, and local processing associated with narrow scope of attention facilitates recognition of sad faces. The novel results of the study provide conclusive evidence for emotion–cognition interactions by demonstrating the effect of perceptual processing on emotional faces. The results along with earlier complementary results on the effect of emotion on global–local processing support a reciprocal relationship between emotional processing and global–local processing. Distractor processing with emotional information also has implications for theories of selective attention.

[1]  Narayanan Srinivasan,et al.  Emotion-attention interactions in recognition memory for distractor faces. , 2010, Emotion.

[2]  Frederick A A Kingdom,et al.  Color brings relief to human vision , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Dolan,et al.  Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, Neuron.

[4]  William Revelle,et al.  Who Sees Trees Before Forest? , 2005, Psychological science.

[5]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis , 2007, Cognition & emotion.

[6]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention. , 1994 .

[7]  J. Förster,et al.  Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention , 2006 .

[8]  N. Srinivasan,et al.  Emotions help memory for faces: Role of whole and parts , 2009 .

[9]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Selective Attention Determines Emotional Responses to Novel Visual Stimuli , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  Jon Driver,et al.  Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global Versus Local Processing of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[13]  D. Tucker,et al.  Motivating the focus of attention. , 1994 .

[14]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires , 2005, Cognition & emotion.

[16]  N. Srinivasan,et al.  Global-happy and local-sad: Perceptual processing affects emotion identification , 2010 .

[17]  B. Fredrickson.  The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  Klaus Kessler,et al.  Attentional Inhibition Has Social-Emotional Consequences for Unfamiliar Faces , 2005, Psychological science.

[19]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Look at me, I'm smiling: Visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions , 2005 .

[20]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Article Commentary: Averaged Faces Are Attractive, but Very Attractive Faces Are Not Average , 1991 .

[21]  E W Yund,et al.  The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  R. Adolphs,et al.  2. The role of the human amygdala in emotional modulation of long-term declarative memory , 2002 .

[23]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Wim Van Paesschen,et al.  The role of the human amygdala in emotion , 2006 .

[25]  C Neil Macrae,et al.  Do I Know You? Processing Orientation and Face Recognition , 2002, Psychological science.

[26]  D R Badcock,et al.  Low-Frequency Filtering and the Processing of Local—Global Stimuli , 1990, Perception.

[27]  Derek M. Isaacowitz,et al.  Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli , 2006, Motivation and emotion.

[28]  R. Egly,et al.  Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  G. Clore,et al.  On the interdependence of cognition and emotion , 2007, Cognition & emotion.

[31]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Affective Influences of Selective Attention , 2006 .

[33]  Narayanan Srinivasan,et al.  Time course of visual attention with emotional faces , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Jens Förster,et al.  How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus , 2005, Psychological science.

[35]  F. Strack,et al.  Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation , 2003 .