Model Formulation: The BRIDG Project: A Technical Report

OBJECTIVES The Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) project is a collaborative initiative between the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC), the Regulated Clinical Research Information Management Technical Committee (RCRIM TC) of Health Level 7 (HL7), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to develop a model of the shared understanding of the semantics of clinical research. DESIGN The BRIDG project is based on open-source collaborative principles and an implementation-independent, use-case driven approach to model development. In the BRIDG model, declarative and procedural knowledge are represented using the Unified Modeling Language (UML) class, activity and state diagrams. MEASUREMENTS The BRIDG model currently contains harmonized semantics from four project use cases: the caXchange project and the patient study calendar project from caBIG; the standard data tabular model (SDTM) from CDISC; and the regulated products submission model (RPS) from HL7. Scalable harmonization processes have been developed to expand the model with content from additional use cases. RESULTS The first official release of the BRIDG model was published in June 2007. Use of the BRIDG model by the NCI has supported the rapid development of semantic interoperability across applications within the caBIG program. CONCLUSIONS The BRIDG project has brought together different standards communities to clarify the semantics of clinical research across pharmaceutical, regulatory, and research organizations. Currently, the NCI uses the BRIDG model to support interoperable application development in the caBIG, and CDISC and HL7 are using the BRIDG model to support standards development.

[1]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Shared leadership in the Apache project , 1999, CACM.

[2]  Fabiane Bizinella Nardon,et al.  Knowledge Sharing and Information Integration in Healthcare using Ontologies and Deductive Databases , 2004, MedInfo.

[3]  K. Buetow,et al.  Cancer Informatics Vision: caBIG™ , 2006, Cancer informatics.

[4]  I. Sim,et al.  Beyond Trial Registration: A Global Trial Bank for Clinical Trial Reporting , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[5]  Charles N Mead,et al.  Data interchange standards in healthcare IT--computable semantic interoperability: now possible but still difficult, do we really need a better mousetrap? , 2006, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[6]  Michael P. Georgeff,et al.  Procedural Expert Systems , 1983, IJCAI.

[7]  Scott Gustafson,et al.  caCORE: A common infrastructure for cancer informatics , 2003, Bioinform..

[8]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[9]  Xiaoshu Wang,et al.  From XML to RDF: how semantic web technologies will change the design of 'omic' standards , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[11]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[12]  Michael Pilato Version Control with Subversion , 2004 .

[13]  Qing Li,et al.  Unified Modeling Language , 2009 .

[14]  Ida Sim,et al.  Standardized Reporting of Clinical Trials into Electronic Trial Banks : In Support of Computer-assisted Evidence-based Medicine , 1996 .

[15]  M A Musen,et al.  Domain Ontologies in Software Engineering: Use of Protégé with the EON Architecture , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[16]  Peter Friedland Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge from Domain Experts , 1981, IJCAI.

[17]  Scott W. Ambler,et al.  The Object Primer: Agile Model-Driven Development with UML 2.0 , 2004 .

[18]  G Rennels,et al.  A trial bank model for the publication of clinical trials. , 1995, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[19]  Joshua Phillips,et al.  The caCORE Software Development Kit: Streamlining construction of interoperable biomedical information services , 2006, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[20]  Gio Wiederhold The Impossibility of Global Consistency , 2003, OMICS.

[21]  Ram Chilukuri,et al.  Common Data Element (CDE) Management and Deployment in Clinical Trials , 2003, AMIA.