Mechanical response of infant brain to manually inflicted shaking

Abstract Shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is a contentious issue on both biomechanical and medical fronts, primarily due to a lack of understanding of the loading—injury relationship of infant shaking and the parameters that are deterministic to its nature. In order to address this lack, a finite element (FE) representation of a three month infant head was developed to apply kinematics derived from physical testing with an anthropomorphic infant surrogate. The FE mesh was derived from a three-dimensional geometric basis, allowing for mesh size grading in regions of high importance, and future patient-specific adaptation. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was represented through static pressure equilibration in combination with a locally based squeezing resistance. The results of the simulation indicate that anteroposterior shaking will lead to specific patterns of brain matter motion, increased likelihood of focal axonal injury at contact locations and deep brain structures, and a capacity for the development of subdural hematomas (SDH) due to rupture of central bridging veins.

[1]  F. Albermani,et al.  Infant brain subjected to oscillatory loading: material differentiation, properties, and interface conditions , 2008, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[2]  F. Tomasello,et al.  In vivo atlas of deep brain structures : with 3D reconstructions , 2002 .

[3]  Svein Kleiven,et al.  Influence of impact direction on the human head in prediction of subdural hematoma. , 2003, Journal of neurotrauma.

[4]  M. Parulekar,et al.  Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  J F Geddes,et al.  Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. I. Patterns of brain damage. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  J. Caffey The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. , 1974, Pediatrics.

[7]  S. Margulies,et al.  Traumatic axonal injury is exacerbated following repetitive closed head injury in the neonatal pig. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[8]  M. C. Lee,et al.  Insensitivity of tensile failure properties of human bridging veins to strain rate: implications in biomechanics of subdural hematoma. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  A. Gefen,et al.  Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Z. S. Couper,et al.  Biomechanics of shaken baby syndrome: physical testing and numerical modeling , 2005 .

[11]  F. Velardi,et al.  Anisotropic constitutive equations and experimental tensile behavior of brain tissue , 2006, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[12]  Dr. Sebastiano Lucerna,et al.  In Vivo Atlas of Deep Brain Structures , 2002, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[13]  Zachariah Sol Couper THE POTENTIAL FOR PEDIATRIC TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY DUE TO SHAKING , 2007 .

[14]  J. Crandall,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Human Brain Under Combined Rotational and Translational Accelerations , 1994 .

[16]  F. Albermani,et al.  Infant brain subjected to oscillatory loading , 2008 .

[17]  C Z CORY,et al.  Can Shaking Alone Cause Fatal Brain Injury? , 2003, Medicine, science, and the law.

[18]  David F. Meaney,et al.  IN VIVO THRESHOLDS FOR MECHANICAL INJURY TO THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER , 1997 .

[19]  A. Holbourn MECHANICS OF HEAD INJURIES , 1943 .

[20]  R. Berger,et al.  Injury biomechanics for aiding in the diagnosis of abusive head trauma. , 2002, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[21]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  King H. Yang,et al.  A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  O. Pinkus,et al.  Theory of Hydrodynamic Lubrication , 1962 .

[24]  J W Melvin,et al.  Development of tissue level brain injury criteria by finite element analysis. , 1995, Journal of neurotrauma.

[25]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[26]  M. Prange,et al.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  C. Saint-Martin,et al.  Neuroimaging of intraparenchymal lesions predicts outcome in shaken baby syndrome. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[28]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms , 2003 .

[29]  Brittany Coats,et al.  Anthropomorphic simulations of falls, shakes, and inflicted impacts in infants. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  T A Gennarelli,et al.  The Shaken Baby Syndrome: A Clinical, Pathological, and Biomechanical Study , 1987 .

[31]  L. Sundstrom,et al.  A tissue level tolerance criterion for living brain developed with an in vitro model of traumatic mechanical loading. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[32]  J. Adams,et al.  Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate , 1982, Annals of neurology.