Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory

Sperm competition theory predicts that males should strategically allocate their sperm reserves according to the level of sperm competition, defined as the probability that the sperm of two males compete for fertilizing a given set of ova. Substantial evidence from numerous animal taxa suggests that, at the individual level, sperm expenditure increases when the risk of sperm competition is greater. In contrast, according to the “intensity model” of sperm competition [Parker, G. A., Ball, M. A., Stockley, P. & Gage, M. J. G. (1996) Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 263, 1291–1297], when more than two ejaculates compete during a given mating event, sperm expenditure should decrease as the number of competing males increases. Empirical evidence supporting this prediction, however, is still lacking. Here we measured sperm expenditure in two gobiid fishes, the grass (Zosterisessor ophiocephalus) and black goby (Gobius niger), in which up to six sneakers can congregate around the nest of territorial males and release their sperm when females spawn. We show that, in accordance with theory, sneaker males of both species release fewer sperm as the number of competitors increases.

[1]  K. Lindström,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of the Courtship Acoustic Behaviour and Sound Patterning in Male Sand Goby, Pomatoschistus minutus , 2000, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[2]  A. Marconato,et al.  On the mechanism of sperm release in three gobiid fishes (Teleostei: Gobiidae) , 1996, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[3]  R. R. Warner Large mating aggregations and daily long-distance spawning migrations in the bluehead wrasse,Thalassoma bifasciatum , 1995, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[4]  C. Petersen Variation in reproductive success and gonadal allocation in the simultaneous hermaphrodite, Serranus fasciatus , 1990, Oecologia.

[5]  S. Sakaluk,et al.  Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: not all species play games , 2001 .

[6]  T. Burke,et al.  Ejaculate allocation by male sand martins, Riparia riparia , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  C. Mazzoldi,et al.  Mating system and alternative male mating tactics in the grass goby Zosterisessor ophiocephalus (Teleostei: Gobiidae) , 2000 .

[8]  L. S. Davis,et al.  Strategic allocation of ejaculates by male Adélie penguins , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Insemination efficiency of two alternative male mating tactics in the guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  N. Wedell,et al.  Butterflies tailor their ejaculate in response to sperm competition risk and intensity , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  P. Stockley Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection , 1999, Heredity.

[12]  C. Mazzoldi,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION AND MODE OF FERTILIZATION IN THE GRASS GOBY ZOSTERISESSOR OPHIOCEPHALUS (TELEOSTEI : GOBIIDAE) , 1999 .

[13]  R. Fuller Sperm competition affects male behaviour and sperm output in the rainbow darter , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  A. Møller,et al.  Sperm competition and sexual selection , 1998 .

[15]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  L. Simmons,et al.  Ejaculate expenditure by malebush crickets decreases with sperm competition intensity , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition games: inter- and intra-species results of a continuous external fertilization model. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  R. Shine,et al.  Is sperm really so cheap? Costs of reproduction in male adders, Vipera berus , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  T. Burke,et al.  Alternative reproductive tactics in atlantic salmon: factors affecting mature parr success , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  G. Pavan,et al.  Sound production during courtship and spawning among freshwater gobiids (pisces, gobiidae) , 1997 .

[21]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  N. Wedell,et al.  Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success? , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  C. Barnard,et al.  Male crickets increase sperm number in relation to competition and female size , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  G. Parker,et al.  Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations , 1995 .

[25]  D. Shapiro,et al.  Sperm Economy in a Coral Reef Fish, Thalassoma Bifasciatum , 1994 .

[26]  D. Hosken,et al.  Bushcricket spermatophores vary in accord with sperm competition and parental investment theory , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Marija J. Norusis,et al.  SPSS for Windows Base System User''s Guide , 1992 .

[28]  M. Gage Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  G. Parker Sperm competition games: raffles and roles , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  G. Parker Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  D. Kramer,et al.  Is Sperm Cheap? Limited Male Fertility and Female Choice in the Lemon Tetra (Pisces, Characidae) , 1982, Science.

[32]  D. Dewsbury,et al.  Ejaculate Cost and Male Choice , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[33]  M. Gross,et al.  Sneakers, Satellites and Parentals: Polymorphic Mating Strategies in North American Sunfishes , 1982 .

[34]  L. Colombo,et al.  Endocrinology of teleost reproduction: A testicular steroid pheromone in the black goby, Gobius jozo L. , 1980 .