SEXUAL SELECTION, VIABILITY SELECTION, AND DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY IN THE DOMESTIC FLY MUSCA DOMESTICA

Associations between developmental stability, sexual selection, and viability selection were studied in the domestic fly Musca domestica (Diptera, Muscidae). Developmental stability of the wings and tibia of flies of both sexes, measured in terms of their level of fluctuating asymmetry, was positively associated with mating success in free ranging populations and in sexual selection experiments. Mated individuals may have obtained indirect fitness benefits from sexual selection of two different kinds. First, the entomopathogenic fungus Enthomophthora muscae (Zygomycetes, Entomophthorales) infects and kills adult domestic flies, and flies dead from fungus infections had more asymmetric wings than flies dead for other reasons. Experimental deposition of fungus spores on uninfected flies demonstrated that flies with asymmetric wings were more susceptible to fungus infections than flies with symmetric wings. Second, domestic flies were frequently eaten by insectivorous barn swallows Hirundo rustica, and flies depredated by birds had more asymmetric wings and tibia than surviving flies.

[1]  W. P. Byrd,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics , 2012, Quantitative Genetics.

[2]  R. Thornhill,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the heritability of developmental stability , 1997 .

[3]  A. Møller,et al.  Sexual Selection in the Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica). IV. Patterns of Fluctuating Asymmetry and Selection against Asymmetry , 1994 .

[4]  A. Møller Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in sexual ornaments predict female choice , 1993 .

[5]  Adrian L. R. Thomas On the aerodynamics of birds’ tails , 1993 .

[6]  J. Manning,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in Scatophaga stercoraria L.: successful males are more symmetrical , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  A. Møller Morphology and sexual selection in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica in Chernobyl, Ukraine , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  D. Schluter,et al.  Sexual selection when the female directly benefits , 1993 .

[9]  T. Radesäter,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and forceps size in earwigs, Forficula auricularia , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and the mating system of the Japanese scorpionfly, Panorpa japonica , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japonica: Mecoptera) , 1992 .

[12]  A. Møller Parasites differentially increase the degree of fluctuating asymmetry in secondary sexual characters , 1992 .

[13]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[14]  W. Becker Manual of Quantitative Genetics , 1992 .

[15]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Genetic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  A. Møller,et al.  Sexual ornament size and the cost of fluctuating asymmetry , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  EFFECTS OF A HAEMATOPHAGOUS MITE ON THE BARN SWALLOW (HIRUNDO RUSTICA): A TEST OF THE HAMILTON AND ZUK HYPOTHESIS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  A Grafen,et al.  Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  P. Parsons,et al.  FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY: AN EPIGENETIC MEASURE OF STRESS , 1990, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[23]  G. Hoelzer The good parent process of sexual selection , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  J. Heywood SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Selection for increased desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: additive genetic control and correlated responses for other stresses. , 1989, Genetics.

[26]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  B. Mullens,et al.  An Epizootiological Study of Entomophthora muscae in muscoid fly populations on Southern California poultry facilities, with emphasis on Musca domestica , 1987 .

[28]  M. Andersson EVOLUTION OF CONDITION‐DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCES , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  B. Mullens,et al.  Dynamics of Entomophthora muscae (Entomophthorales: Entomophthoraceae) Conidial Discharge from Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) Cadavers , 1985 .

[30]  B. Mullens Host age, sex, and pathogen exposure level as factors in the susceptibility of Musca domestica to Entomophthora muscae , 1985 .

[31]  James H. Brown,et al.  Truth in Advertising: The Kinds of Traits Favored by Sexual Selection , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[32]  P. Brobyn,et al.  Invasive and developmental processes of Entomophthora muscae infecting houseflies (Musca domestica) , 1983 .

[33]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[34]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  E. H. Bryant,et al.  COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC ADAPTATION OF THE HOUSEFLY AND THE FACE FLY IN THE UNITED STATES , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  E. H. Bryant MORPHOMETRIC ADAPTATION OF THE HOUSEFLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA L., IN THE UNITED STATES , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  H. Shorey,et al.  The Courtship Behavior of the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) , 1975 .

[39]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[40]  P. Smith,et al.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[41]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[42]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  A. P. M Ller SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE BARN SWALLOW (HIRUNDO RUSTICA). IV. PATTERNS OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY AND SELECTION AGAINST ASYMMETRY. , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  J. Latgé,et al.  Atlas of Entomopathogenic Fungi , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[45]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Fluctuating Asymmetry: Measurement, Analysis, Patterns , 1986 .

[46]  Wilhelm Ludwig,et al.  Das Rechts-Links-Problem im Tierreich und beim Menschen , 1932 .