Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility and accuracy of a synthetic-echo time (TE) magnetic resonance (MR) postprocessing technique for the diagnostic evaluation of abnormalities of menisci and articular cartilage in the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was approved by the institutional review board. Twenty-four patients (three women, 21 men; mean age, 44.8 years) gave informed written consent to prospectively undergo evaluation of their knees (10 left and 14 right knees) with standard sagittal intermediate-weighted (repetition time msec/TE msec, 2200/17) and fat-saturated T2-weighted (3600/88) fast spin-echo sequences. In addition, sagittal multiecho fast gradient-echo sequences were performed for the generation of synthetic-TE images with variable T2- or T2(*)-weighted contrast by using a newly developed synthetic-TE analysis tool that was incorporated directly into the picture archiving and communication system. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for detection of lesions in menisci and articular cartilage were calculated by using findings at surgery as reference standard. RESULTS The standard intermediate-weighted and fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR sequences had overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 100% and 100%, 88% and 93%, and 95% and 95% for the diagnosis of tears of medial and lateral menisci, respectively, as well as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 82%, 97%, and 95%, respectively, for articular cartilage defects. Corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for multiecho MR imaging with synthetic-TE MR image generation were 92% and 100%, 88% and 87%, and 90% and 90% for the diagnosis of tears of medial and lateral menisci, respectively, as well as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 70%, 99%, and 95%, respectively, for articular cartilage defects. CONCLUSION For the evaluation of menisci and articular cartilage, images generated with the synthetic-TE technique are a potentially viable alternative to standard T2-weighted images obtained at different TEs. Furthermore, the synthetic-TE approach allowed assessment of abnormalities of menisci and articular cartilage with high sensitivity and specificity.

[1]  N M Hylton,et al.  Multiple spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Radiology.

[2]  Philip J Beatty,et al.  Isotropic MRI of the knee with 3D fast spin-echo extended echo-train acquisition (XETA): initial experience. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  B. Rutt,et al.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  G N Duda,et al.  Altered cartilage mechanics and histology in knee osteoarthritis: relation to clinical assessment (ICRS Grade). , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[5]  J N Lee,et al.  Pulse sequence extrapolation with MR image synthesis. , 1986, Radiology.

[6]  J N Lee,et al.  Automated MR image synthesis: feasibility studies. , 1984, Radiology.

[7]  R. Newcombe.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  J N Lee,et al.  Instrumentation for rapid MR image synthesis , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Cartilage T2 assessment: differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage and reparative tissue after arthroscopic cartilage repair in equine subjects. , 2006, Radiology.

[11]  J. Pauly,et al.  Linear combination filtering for T2‐selective imaging of the knee , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  H. Genant,et al.  Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  V J Schmithorst,et al.  Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[15]  T J Mosher,et al.  Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2--preliminary findings at 3 T. , 2000, Radiology.

[16]  D. Schaefer.  Dosimetry and Effects of MR Exposure to RF and Switched Magnetic Fields , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J N Lee,et al.  Synthesized MR images: comparison with acquired images. , 1985, Radiology.

[18]  H J Mankin,et al.  Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. , 1998, Instructional course lectures.

[19]  Ingwer C. Carlsen,et al.  Real-Time Interactive NMR Image Synthesis , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Articular cartilage defects detected with 3D water-excitation true FISP: prospective comparison with sequences commonly used for knee imaging. , 2007, Radiology.

[21]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance , 2007, European Radiology.

[22]  Reed F Busse,et al.  Reduced RF power without blurring: Correcting for modulation of refocusing flip angle in FSE sequences , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Christian W A Pfirrmann,et al.  Imaging of patellar cartilage with a 2D multiple-echo data image combination sequence. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  G M Bydder,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of short T2 components in tissue. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[25]  J R MacFall,et al.  An analysis of noise propagation in computed T2, pseudodensity, and synthetic spin-echo images. , 1986, Medical physics.

[26]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[27]  M. G. Fox,et al.  MR imaging of the meniscus: review, current trends, and clinical implications. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[28]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Cartilaginous defects of the femorotibial joint: accuracy of coronal short inversion time inversion-recovery MR sequence. , 2006, Radiology.

[29]  Wilhelm Horger,et al.  Diagnosis of articular cartilage abnormalities of the knee: prospective clinical evaluation of a 3D water-excitation true FISP sequence. , 2007, Radiology.

[30]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Meniscal measurements of T1rho and T2 at MR imaging in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. , 2008, Radiology.

[31]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[32]  J N Lee,et al.  The contrast‐to‐noise in relaxation time, synthetic, and weighted‐sum MR images , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  J N Lee,et al.  Improved precision in calculated T1 MR images using multiple spin-echo acquisition. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[34]  G. Bydder,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the menisci of the knee using ultrashort echo time (UTE) pulse sequences: imaging of the red and white zones. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[35]  Terry M Peters,et al.  Synthetic T1-weighted brain image generation with incorporated coil intensity correction using DESPOT1. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[36]  J N Lee,et al.  The precision of TR extrapolation in magnetic resonance image synthesis. , 1986, Medical physics.

[37]  M. Robson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee with ultrashort TE pulse sequences. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[38]  J N Lee,et al.  Magnetic resonance image synthesis. Clinical implementation. , 1986, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.