Production-Aware Analysis of Multi-disciplinary Systems Engineering Processes

The Industry 4.0 vision of flexible manufacturing systems depends on the collaboration of domain experts coming from a variety of engineering disciplines and on the explicit representation of knowledge on relationships between products and production systems (PPR knowledge). However, in multi-disciplinary systems engineering organizations, process analysis and improvement has traditionally focused on one specific discipline rather than on the collaboration of several workgroups and their exchange of knowledge on product/ion, i.e., product and production processes. In this paper, we investigate requirements for the product/ion-aware analysis of engineering processes to improve the engineering process across workgroups. We introduce a product/ion-aware engineering processes analysis (PPR EPA) method, to identify gaps in PPR knowledge needed and provided. For representing PPR knowledge, we introduce a product/ion-aware data processing map (PPR DPM) by extending the BPMN 2.0 standard, adding PPR knowledge classification. We evaluate the contribution in a case study at a large production systems engineering company. The domain experts found the PPR EPA method using the PPR DPM usable and useful to trace design decisions in the engineering process as foundation for advanced quality assurance analyses.

[1]  Junliang Chen,et al.  Modeling and analysis of data dependencies in business process for data-intensive services , 2017, China Communications.

[2]  Cunlu Zhang,et al.  Modeling and functional design of logistic park using IDEFO method , 2010, 2010 7th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management.

[3]  Kristin Decker,et al.  Uml Distilled A Brief Guide To The Standard Object Modeling Language , 2016 .

[4]  Jürgen Jasperneite,et al.  Requirements and concept for Plug-and-Work , 2015, Autom..

[5]  Per Runeson,et al.  Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering , 2009, Empirical Software Engineering.

[6]  Thomas Wagner,et al.  Mining technical dependencies throughout engineering process knowledge , 2011, ETFA2011.

[7]  Thomas Allweyer,et al.  BPMN 2.0 : introduction to the standard for business process modeling , 2016 .

[8]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Introduction to the Multi-Disciplinary Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems , 2017, Multi-Disciplinary Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems.

[9]  Alexander Fay,et al.  Zusätzliche Wertschöpfung mit digitalem Modell , 2018, atp magazin.

[10]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Design science methodology: principles and practice , 2010, 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering.

[11]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy Changing and Evolving Products and Systems - Models and Enablers , 2009 .

[12]  Philipp Rosenberger,et al.  Context-Aware System Analysis: Introduction of a Process Model for Industrial Applications , 2018, ICEIS.

[13]  Birthe Böhm,et al.  Application of engineering processes analysis to evaluate benefits of mechatronic engineering , 2012, Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2012).

[14]  Nigel Bevan,et al.  International standards for usability should be more widely used , 2009 .

[15]  Donald H. Liles,et al.  Use of IDEF0 for the design and specification of methodologies , 1995 .

[16]  Nicole Schmidt,et al.  Fundamentals of Artifact Reuse in CPPS , 2017, Multi-Disciplinary Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems.

[17]  Riza Sulaiman,et al.  Business Process Modelling in Production Logistics: Complementary Use of BPMN and UML , 2013 .

[18]  Carina Alves,et al.  Exploring the Ambidextrous Analysis of Business Processes: A Design Science Research , 2017, ICEIS.

[19]  George A. Randall Guidelines for Conducting a Metric Workshop. , 1978 .