Negative Epistasis in Experimental RNA Fitness Landscapes

Mutations and their effects on fitness are a fundamental component of evolution. The effects of some mutations change in the presence of other mutations, and this is referred to as epistasis. Epistasis can occur between mutations in different genes or within the same gene. A systematic study of epistasis requires the analysis of numerous mutations and their combinations, which has recently become feasible with advancements in DNA synthesis and sequencing. Here we review the mutational effects and epistatic interactions within RNA molecules revealed by several recent high-throughput mutational studies involving two ribozymes studied in vitro, as well as a tRNA and a snoRNA studied in yeast. The data allow an analysis of the distribution of fitness effects of individual mutations as well as combinations of two or more mutations. Two different approaches to measuring epistasis in the data both reveal a predominance of negative epistasis, such that higher combinations of two or more mutations are typically lower in fitness than expected from the effect of each individual mutation. These data are in contrast to past studies of epistasis that used computationally predicted secondary structures of RNA that revealed a predominance of positive epistasis. The RNA data reviewed here are more similar to that found from mutational experiments on individual protein enzymes, suggesting that a common thermodynamic framework may explain negative epistasis between mutations within macromolecules.

[1]  D. Shub,et al.  Self-splicing introns in tRNA genes of widely divergent bacteria , 1992, Nature.

[2]  D. Herschlag,et al.  An RNA chaperone activity of non‐specific RNA binding proteins in hammerhead ribozyme catalysis. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[3]  D. Herschlag RNA Chaperones and the RNA Folding Problem (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  M. Whitlock,et al.  MULTIPLE FITNESS PEAKS AND EPISTASIS , 1995 .

[5]  R. Lenski,et al.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria , 1997, Nature.

[6]  L. Chao,et al.  Epistasis and its consequences for the evolution of natural populations. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution , 1998, Nature.

[8]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  C. Wilke,et al.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation , 2002, Nature.

[11]  C. Wilke,et al.  Compensatory mutations cause excess of antagonistic epistasis in RNA secondary structure folding , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[12]  N. Lehman A Case for the Extreme Antiquity of Recombination , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[13]  D. Rubinson,et al.  A La protein requirement for efficient pre‐tRNA folding , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[14]  Rafael Sanjuán,et al.  The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Stability and the evolvability of function in a model protein. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Andrew D. Ellington,et al.  The Robustness of Naturally and Artificially Selected Nucleic Acid Secondary Structures , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  C. Petropoulos,et al.  Evidence for Positive Epistasis in HIV-1 , 2004, Science.

[18]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  Real ribozymes suggest a relaxed error threshold , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  PERSPECTIVE:SIGN EPISTASIS AND GENETIC CONSTRAINT ON EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES , 2005 .

[20]  Eric J. Hayden,et al.  RNA-directed construction of structurally complex and active ligase ribozymes through recombination. , 2005, RNA.

[21]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein , 2006, Nature.

[22]  C. Wilke,et al.  Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2006 .

[23]  A. Lambowitz,et al.  Involvement of DEAD-box proteins in group I and group II intron splicing. Biochemical characterization of Mss116p, ATP hydrolysis-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and general RNA chaperone activity. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  Epistasis between deleterious mutations and the evolution of recombination. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  S. Elena,et al.  Fitness Declines in Tobacco Etch Virus upon Serial Bottleneck Transfers , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[26]  P. Keightley,et al.  A Comparison of Models to Infer the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations , 2013, Genetics.

[27]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  The Speed of Evolution and Maintenance of Variation in Asexual Populations , 2007, Current Biology.

[28]  R. Russell RNA misfolding and the action of chaperones. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[29]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  In the Light of Evolution III: Two Centuries of Darwin Sackler Colloquium: In the light of directed evolution: Pathways of adaptive protein evolution , 2009 .

[30]  Marcus W Feldman,et al.  The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.

[31]  D. Halligan,et al.  Spontaneous Mutation Accumulation Studies in Evolutionary Genetics , 2009 .

[32]  Y. Li,et al.  Prevalent positive epistasis in E. coli and S. cerevisiae metabolic networks , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[33]  R. Sanjuán mutagenesis studies viruses : common patterns revealed by site-directed Mutational fitness effects in RNA and single-stranded DNA , 2010 .

[34]  Susan Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 and Environmental Stress Transform the Adaptive Value of Natural Genetic Variation , 2010, Science.

[35]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[36]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  C. Adami,et al.  Impact of epistasis and pleiotropy on evolutionary adaptation , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Rick Russell,et al.  The Azoarcus Group I Intron Ribozyme Misfolds and Is Accelerated for Refolding by ATP-dependent RNA Chaperone Proteins* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  The Origins of Evolutionary Innovations: A Theory of Transformative Change in Living Systems , 2011 .

[40]  Michael L. Manapat,et al.  Spontaneous network formation among cooperative RNA replicators , 2012, Nature.

[41]  Edith D. Wong,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Robert B. Heckendorn,et al.  Should evolutionary geneticists worry about higher-order epistasis? , 2013, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[43]  Gregory W. Campbell,et al.  Comprehensive experimental fitness landscape and evolutionary network for small RNA , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  C. Trahan,et al.  DEAD-Box RNA Helicase Dbp4 Is Required for Small-Subunit Processome Formation and Function , 2014, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[45]  R. Breaker,et al.  A widespread self-cleaving ribozyme class is revealed by bioinformatics , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[46]  Eric J. Hayden,et al.  Intramolecular phenotypic capacitance in a modular RNA molecule , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  D. Schneider,et al.  RNA chaperones buffer deleterious mutations in E. coli , 2015, eLife.

[48]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  The fitness landscape of a tRNA gene , 2016, Science.

[49]  B. Chait,et al.  UtpA and UtpB chaperone nascent pre-ribosomal RNA and U3 snoRNA to initiate eukaryotic ribosome assembly , 2016, Nature Communications.

[50]  Y. Yokobayashi,et al.  High‐Throughput Mutational Analysis of a Twister Ribozyme , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[51]  N. Lehman,et al.  Sex in a test tube: testing the benefits of in vitro recombination , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Guido Sanguinetti,et al.  Network of epistatic interactions within a yeast snoRNA , 2016, Science.

[53]  Michael J Harms,et al.  Detecting High-Order Epistasis in Nonlinear Genotype-Phenotype Maps , 2016, Genetics.

[54]  R. Maraia,et al.  Factors That Shape Eukaryotic tRNAomes: Processing, Modification and Anticodon–Codon Use , 2017, Biomolecules.