OBJECTIVE
To estimate the total hours of paid and unpaid personal assistance of daily living provided to adults living at home in the United States using nationally representative household survey data.
DATA SOURCES
The Disability Followback Survey of the National Health Interview Survey on Disability (NHIS-D) conducted from 1994 to 1997.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS
Data were obtained on persons receiving help with up to 5 ADLs and 10 IADLs, for up to 4 helpers, including the activities they helped with, whether the helper was paid or not, and the number of hours of help provided in the two weeks prior to the survey. The sample consists of 8,471 household-resident adults ages 18 and older receiving help with personal assistance. About 22 percent of the sample has missing data on hours, which we impute by multiple regression models using demographic, ADL, and IADL variables.
FINDINGS
We estimate that 13.2 million noninstitutionalized adults receive an average of 31.4 hours per week of personal assistance in ADLs and IADLs per week, with 3.2 million people receiving an average of 17.6 hours of paid help and 11.7 million receiving an average of 30.7 hours of unpaid help. More persons ages 18-64 received help than those ages 65 and older (6.9 versus 6.2 million), but working-age recipients had fewer hours (27.4 versus 35.9) per week, due in part to less severe levels of disability.
CONCLUSIONS
Personal assistance provided to adults with disabilities amounts to 21.5 billion hours of help per year, with an economic value in 1996 approaching $200 billion. Only 16 percent of this total is paid, representing $32 billion in home health services spent annually. This study, the first to estimate hours of assistance for both working-age and older adults, documents that older persons are more likely to receive paid personal assistance, while working-age people rely to a greater extent on unpaid help. This study begins to articulate the division of labor in the provision of personal assistance. Estimates of paid and unpaid hours of help by number of ADLs should inform policy concerning eligibility boundaries in long term care.
[1]
S. Crawford,et al.
A comparison of anlaytic methods for non-random missingness of outcome data.
,
1995,
Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[2]
C Levine,et al.
The economic value of informal caregiving.
,
1999,
Health affairs.
[3]
R. Andersen.
Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?
,
1995,
Journal of health and social behavior.
[4]
K G Manton,et al.
Changes in home care use by disabled elderly persons: 1982-1994.
,
2000,
The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.
[5]
A Profile of Adults Needing Assistance with Activities of Daily Living, 1991-1992. Disability Statistics Report 11.
,
1997
.
[6]
R. Boaz.
Full-time employment and informal caregiving in the 1980s.
,
1996,
Medical care.
[7]
K. Levit,et al.
National Health Expenditures, 1996
,
1997,
Health care financing review.
[8]
Eun Sul Lee,et al.
Analyzing Complex Survey Data
,
1989
.
[9]
N. Duan.
Smearing Estimate: A Nonparametric Retransformation Method
,
1983
.