The rise of risk and the decline of politics

Abstract This paper argues that the rise of risk and formal risk assessment has contributed to the demise of representative democratic politics by displacing public discourses about values with technical justifications for decision making. Furthermore, risk plays a central role in the displacement of governmental responsibility to private sector and NGO actors at the same time as facilitating government control over citizens—the Janus faces1 of governance and governmentality. Arguing that the turn to public participation cannot be the panacea for the present situation, the paper concludes by calling for revitalisation of representative institutions, the development of real-time technology assessment and development of popular connoisseurship of science and technology.

[1]  Trish Glazebrook.  Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community , 2001 .

[2]  J. Habermas.  The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[3]  A. Whitehead.  An Introduction to Mathematics , 1949, Nature.

[4]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[5]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[6]  Victor R. Baker,et al.  Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community , 1999 .

[7]  Andrea Cornwall,et al.  From Users and Choosers to Makers and Shapers: Repositioning Participation in Social Policy * , 2000 .

[8]  M. Korstanje.  The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[9]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Policy Research in the Context of Diffuse Decision Making. , 1982 .

[10]  B. Agarwal,et al.  Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework , 2001 .

[11]  A. Giddens.  Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[12]  Ann Oakley,et al.  Trust in Numbers , 1995 .

[13]  C. Pateman.  Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[14]  Using the challenges of diversity for collective learning about sustainability: the Oregon Story , 2003 .

[15]  A. Whitehead.  An Introduction to Mathematics , 1949, Nature.

[16]  P. Self,et al.  Econocrats and the policy process: The politics and philosophy of cost-benefit analysis , 1975 .

[17]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Parties Without Partisans , 2002 .

[18]  Max A. Sobel,et al.  Introduction to mathematics , 1984 .

[19]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making , 2003 .

[20]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation , 1995 .

[21]  C. Hood,et al.  Risk Regulation Under Pressure , 2001 .

[22]  S. Rayner,et al.  Weather Forecasts are for Wimps: Why Water Resource Managers Do Not Use Climate Forecasts , 2005 .

[23]  N. Ellison.  Towards a New Social Politics: Citizenship and Reflexivity in Late Modernity , 1997 .

[24]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality , 1991 .

[25]  Ian Scoones,et al.  Science and citizenship in a global context , 2003 .

[26]  N. Day,et al.  Political participation and democracy in Britain , 1992 .

[27]  M. Sagoff,et al.  The Economy of the Earth: The Allocation and Distribution of Resources , 2007 .

[28]  Catherine Lyall,et al.  New Modes of Governance , 2005 .