Collboard: Fostering new media literacies in the classroom through collaborative problem solving supported by digital pens and interactive whiteboards

Education systems worldwide must strive to support the teaching of a set of New Media Literacies (NMLs). These literacies respond to the need for educating human capital within participatory cultures in a highly technologized world. In this paper, we present Collboard, a constructivist problem solving activity for fostering the development of specific NMLs in classrooms: collective intelligence, distributed cognition and transmedia navigation. Collboard encompasses successive individual and collaborative work phases that prompt active student participation and engagement. It integrates digitally augmented appliances, namely, digital pens as a means to support individual work, and interactive whiteboards as a collaborative knowledge construction space. We report on the conceptual design of Collboard, its different technological and software components, as well as our findings from experiences we conducted in a Swedish school with 12 students from a 7th grade maths class. Findings from the experience provide an indication that Collboard can be well integrated in classroom teaching, and that it can foster the development of collective intelligence, distributed cognition and transmedia navigation in different knowledge domains.

[1]  Yannis A. Dimitriadis,et al.  Ink, Improvisation, and Interactive Engagement: Learning with Tablets , 2007, Computer.

[2]  Ivica Boticki,et al.  Supporting Mobile Collaborative Activities through Scaffolded Flexible Grouping , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Dawn G. Gregg Designing for collective intelligence , 2010, CACM.

[4]  Daniela Caballero,et al.  Collaboration within large groups in the classroom , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[5]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2009 .

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone: Overview and Meta‐analysis , 2002 .

[7]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[8]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[9]  David Miller,et al.  Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school , 2001 .

[10]  Nelson Baloian,et al.  MC-Supporter: Flexible Mobile Computing Supporting Learning though Social Interactions , 2009, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[11]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[12]  C. Scolari Transmedia Storytelling: Implicit Consumers, Narrative Worlds, and Branding in Contemporary Media Production , 2009 .

[13]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[14]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Motoki Miura,et al.  Practical Environment for Realizing Augmented Classroom with Wireless Digital Pens , 2007, KES.

[16]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[17]  Chee-Kit Looi,et al.  Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Hannah Slay,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Ruth Wood,et al.  The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: a case study , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  Matthew Kam,et al.  Livenotes: a system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures , 2005, CHI.

[21]  Max Mühlhäuser,et al.  CoScribe: Using Paper for Collaborative Annotations in Lectures , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[22]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Quiet interfaces that help students think , 2006, UIST.

[23]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  From handheld collaborative tool to effective classroom module: Embedding CSCL in a broader design framework , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards , 2007 .

[26]  Steve Higgins,et al.  'The visual helps me understand the complicated things': pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[28]  Osama Mansour,et al.  Group Intelligence: A Distributed Cognition Perspective , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[29]  Matt Bower,et al.  Affordance analysis – matching learning tasks with learning technologies , 2008 .

[30]  P. Warwick,et al.  Primary teachers’ understanding of the interactive whiteboard as a tool for children’s collaborative learning and knowledge‐building , 2008 .

[31]  Haoxiang Xia,et al.  Toward collective intelligence of online communities: A primitive conceptual model , 2009 .

[32]  P. Dillenbourg What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[33]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[34]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things that make us smart , 1979 .

[35]  M. Warschauer The paradoxical future of digital learning , 2007 .

[36]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Comparative study of netbooks and tablet PCs for fostering face-to-face collaborative learning , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Richard J. Anderson,et al.  Classroom Presenter: Enhancing Interactive Education with Digital Ink , 2007, Computer.

[38]  Jochen Rick,et al.  Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games , 2006 .

[39]  F. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment , 2007 .

[40]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Importance of Awareness for Team Cognition in Distributed Collaboration , 2001 .

[41]  Juanita K. Hewitt Interactive Whiteboards in the classroom , 2010 .

[42]  A. Garton,et al.  The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[43]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher Technology Change , 2010 .

[44]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[45]  Paul Warwick,et al.  In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil's learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[46]  David Miller,et al.  The Interactive Whiteboard as a Force for Pedagogic Change: The Experience of Five Elementary Schools in an English Education Authority , 2002 .

[47]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? , 1990, CSCW '90.

[48]  John Olson,et al.  Visions for ICT, Ethics and the Practice of Teachers , 2005, Education and Information Technologies.

[49]  Rose Tirotta,et al.  Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students' self-reported motivation in mathematics , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[50]  Eduardo Di Petta Henry Jenkins (2006), Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation , 2012 .

[51]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy, and Pupil Performance: An Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project (London Challenge) , 2007 .