Interpreting realized pollen flow in terms of pollinator travel paths and land-use resistance in heterogeneous landscapes
暂无分享,去创建一个
Solenn Stoeckel | Tonya A. Lander | Etienne K. Klein | Stéphanie Mariette | Brigitte Musch | Sylvie Oddou-Muratorio
[1] R. Bošković,et al. Characterisation of novel S-alleles from cherry (Prunus avium L.) , 2008, Tree Genetics & Genomes.
[2] Yvan Richard,et al. Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap‐crossing ability using radio‐tracking data , 2010 .
[3] Jordi Bascompte,et al. Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants. , 2008, Ecology letters.
[4] David R. Anderson,et al. Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .
[5] R. Macarthur,et al. The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .
[6] M. Aizen,et al. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. , 2007, Ecology letters.
[7] Atte Moilanen,et al. METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE , 1998 .
[8] S. Oddou-Muratorio,et al. Estimating the variance of male fecundity from genotypes of progeny arrays: evaluation of the Bayesian forward approach , 2011 .
[9] D. Bebber,et al. The Circe Principle Explains How Resource-Rich Land Can Waylay Pollinators in Fragmented Landscapes , 2011, Current Biology.
[10] M. Fortin,et al. Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis , 2010, Molecular ecology.
[11] J. Ollerton,et al. Landscape structure influences pollinator movements and directly affects plant reproductive success , 2012 .
[12] J. Rappole,et al. The use of movement data as an assay of habitat quality , 1995, Oecologia.
[13] J. Biesmeijer,et al. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[14] Viral B. Shah,et al. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.
[15] R. Macarthur,et al. On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment , 1966, The American Naturalist.
[16] R. Testolin,et al. Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. , 2000, Genome.
[17] Todd C. Esque,et al. Making molehills out of mountains: landscape genetics of the Mojave desert tortoise , 2011, Landscape Ecology.
[18] T. Meagher. Analysis of Paternity within a Natural Population of Chamaelirium luteum. 1. Identification of Most-Likely Male Parents , 1986, The American Naturalist.
[19] W. J. Bell. Searching Behavior Patterns in Insects , 1990 .
[20] S. Oddou-Muratorio,et al. MICROEVOLUTION OF S‐ALLELE FREQUENCIES IN WILD CHERRY POPULATIONS: RESPECTIVE IMPACTS OF NEGATIVE FREQUENCY DEPENDENT SELECTION AND GENETIC DRIFT , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[21] J. Osborne,et al. Pollination biology of fruit-bearing hedgerow plants and the role of flower-visiting insects in fruit-set. , 2009, Annals of botany.
[22] Chris J. Johnson,et al. Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information , 2010, Landscape Ecology.
[23] L. Fahrig,et al. How should we measure landscape connectivity? , 2000, Landscape Ecology.
[24] Veronica A. J. Doerr,et al. Connectivity, dispersal behaviour and conservation under climate change: A response to Hodgson et al. , 2011 .
[25] J. Guitian,et al. Pollen transfer and diurnal versus nocturnal pollination in Lonicera etrusca , 1993 .
[26] B. Degen,et al. Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in four contrasting wild cherry populations (Prunus avium L.) , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.
[27] R. Dyer,et al. Pollination graphs: quantifying pollen pool covariance networks and the influence of intervening landscape on genetic connectivity in the North American understory tree, Cornus florida L. , 2011, Landscape Ecology.
[28] K. Russell. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for wild cherry (Prunus avium) , 2003 .
[29] J. Cottrell,et al. Contemporary pollen flow, characterization of the maternal ecological neighbourhood and mating patterns in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) , 2009, Heredity.
[30] Wilfried Thuiller,et al. Environmental and human factors influencing rare plant local occurrence, extinction and persistence: a 115‐year study in the Mediterranean region , 2005 .
[31] L. Harder,et al. Variation in Pollination: Causes and Consequences for Plant Reproduction , 2009, The American Naturalist.
[32] N. Frascaria-Lacoste,et al. Heterozygote excess in a self‐incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species —Prunus avium L. , 2006, Molecular ecology.
[33] K. Tobutt,et al. Allele-specific PCR detection of sweet cherry self-incompatibility (S) alleles S1 to S16 using consensus and allele-specific primers , 2003, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[34] Clayton M. Hodges,et al. Pollinator flight directionality and the assessment of pollen returns , 1981, Oecologia.
[35] R. Moritz,et al. Foraging distance in Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2008, Apidologie.
[36] A. Dornhaus,et al. Predation risk makes bees reject rewarding flowers and reduce foraging activity , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[37] A. Iezzoni,et al. Polymorphic DNA Markers in Black Cherry (Prunus serotina) Are Identified Using Sequences from Sweet Cherry, Peach, and Sour Cherry , 2000 .
[38] J. Vandermeer,et al. Metapopulation Dynamics and the Quality of the Matrix , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[39] J. Cane. The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields , 1997 .
[40] E. Jules,et al. A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: Why matrix habitat is more important than we thought , 2003 .
[41] J. Koricheva,et al. A Meta-Analysis of Predation Risk Effects on Pollinator Behaviour , 2011, PloS one.
[42] Kevin McGarigal,et al. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review , 2012, Landscape Ecology.
[43] Nicolas Ray,et al. pathmatrix: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples , 2005 .
[44] T. Ricketts. The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[45] J. Thomson,et al. Efficient harvesting of renewing resources , 2005 .
[46] S. Rands,et al. Field Margins, Foraging Distances and Their Impacts on Nesting Pollinator Success , 2011, PloS one.
[47] W. Jordan,et al. Molecular and spatial analyses reveal links between colony-specific foraging distance and landscape-level resource availability in two bumblebee species , 2012 .
[48] R. Testolin,et al. AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch]: isolation, characterisation and cross-species amplification in Prunus , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[49] G. King,et al. Development of a second generation linkage map for almond using RAPD and SSR markers. , 2000, Genome.
[50] Leslie Ries,et al. Ecological Responses to Habitat Edges: Mechanisms, Models, and Variability Explained , 2004 .