Determinants of households’ investment in energy efficiency and renewables: evidence from the OECD survey on household environmental behaviour and attitudes

Many studies on household energy efficiency investments suggest that a wide range of seemingly profitable investments are not taken up. This paper provides novel evidence on the main factors behind consumer choices using the OECD Survey on Household Environmental Behaviour and Attitudes. The empirical analysis is based on the estimation of binary logit regression models. Empirical results suggest that households’ propensity to invest in clean energy technologies depends mainly on home ownership, income, social context and households’ information. Indeed, home owners and high-income households are more likely to invest than renters and low-income households. On the other hand, social context, such as membership in an environmental non-governmental organisation, and households’ knowledge about their energy spending and use may play a relevant role in technology adoption. Les determinants de l'investissement des menages dans l'efficacite energetique et les energies renouvelables : Resultat de l'enquete de l'OCDE sur les comportements et attitudes des menages face aux questions d'environnement De nombreuses etudes sur les investissements des menages en matiere d'efficacite energetique suggerent qu'une large gamme d'investissements apparemment rentables n’est pas exploitee. Cette etude fournit de nouveaux elements de preuve sur les principaux facteurs qui expliquent les choix des consommateurs a l'aide de l'Enquete de l'OCDE sur les comportements et les attitudes des menages avec l’environnement. L'analyse empirique est basee sur l'estimation des modeles de regression logit binaires. Les resultats empiriques suggerent que la propension des menages a investir dans les technologies d'energie propre depend principalement de la propriete, du revenu, du contexte social et de l'information sur le sujet qu’obtiennent les menages. En effet, les proprietaires de maison et les menages a revenu eleve sont plus susceptibles d'investir que les locataires et les menages a faible revenu. D'autre part, le contexte social, tels que l'appartenance a une organisation non gouvernementale pour la protection de l'environnement, la connaissance des menages sur leurs depenses d'energie et l'utilisation peut jouer un role important dans l'adoption de la nouvelle technologie.

[1]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Homeowners' preferences for adopting innovative residential heating systems: A discrete choice analysis for Germany , 2012 .

[2]  Lynn Langmeyer A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. , 1984 .

[3]  Jennifer A. Thacher,et al.  Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model , 2006 .

[4]  E. Shove Putting practice into policy: reconfiguring questions of consumption and climate change , 2014 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[6]  Susana Ferreira,et al.  Shedding Light on the Light Bulb Puzzle: The Role of Attitudes and Perceptions in the Adoption of Energy Efficient Light Bulbs , 2009 .

[7]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis , 2003 .

[8]  A. Young Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) , 2011 .

[9]  Bradford F. Mills,et al.  Why don't households see the light? Explaining the diffusion of compact fluorescent lamps , 2010 .

[10]  A. Raftery Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[11]  J. Schleich,et al.  Profits or preferences? Assessing the adoption of residential solar thermal technologies , 2009 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[13]  James E. Long,et al.  An econometric analysis of residential expenditures on energy conservation and renewable energy sources , 1993 .

[14]  E. Sardianou Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households , 2007 .

[15]  J. Schleich,et al.  Household transitions to energy efficient lighting , 2014 .

[16]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  The Economics of Energy Efficiency , 2004 .

[17]  A. Jaffe Economics of Energy Efficiency , 2004 .

[18]  M. King,et al.  Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing , 2000 .

[19]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  An adopter-centric approach to analyze the diffusion patterns of innovative residential heating systems in Sweden , 2008 .

[20]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[21]  Matthew E. Kahn Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice , 2007 .

[22]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[23]  Ted O’Donoghue,et al.  Doing It Now or Later , 1999 .

[24]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change , 2013 .

[25]  H. Gintis Beyond Homo economicus: evidence from experimental economics , 2000 .

[26]  Mattias Viklund,et al.  Energy policy options—from the perspective of public attitudes and risk perceptions , 2004 .

[27]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  Energy tax credits and residential conservation investment: Evidence from panel data , 1995 .

[28]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Habits and their creatures , 2012 .

[29]  H. Simon,et al.  Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioural Science , 1966 .

[30]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[31]  E. Carretti,et al.  A BROADBAND POLARIZATION CATALOG OF EXTRAGALACTIC RADIO SOURCES , 2014, 1403.2391.

[32]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Gunnar Grendstad,et al.  Correlates of Environmental Behaviors , 2001 .

[34]  Bradford F. Mills,et al.  Residential Energy-Efficient Technology Adoption, Energy Conservation, Knowledge, and Attitudes: An Analysis of European Countries , 2012 .

[35]  S. Scott Household energy efficiency in Ireland: a replication study of ownership of energy saving items , 1997 .

[36]  K. Gillingham,et al.  Split Incentives in Residential Energy Consumption , 2012 .

[37]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  Practices, programs and projects of urban carbon governance: Perspectives from the Australian city , 2014 .

[38]  Bradford F. Mills,et al.  What's driving energy efficient appliance label awareness and purchase propensity? , 2010 .

[39]  M. Stack,et al.  On erosion issues associated with the leading edge of wind turbine blades , 2013 .

[40]  Louisa Flintoft,et al.  Systems biology: Rewiring the network , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[41]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Te , 1995 .

[42]  R. Newell,et al.  Information programs for technology adoption: The case of energy-efficiency audits , 2004 .

[43]  H. Allcott,et al.  Social Norms and Energy Conservation , 2011 .

[44]  L. Sjöberg,et al.  Lifestyles, and Risk Perception Consumer Behavior , 2005 .

[45]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[46]  J. M. Hines,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[47]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Dynamic Choices of Hyperbolic Consumers , 2001 .

[48]  E. Sardianou,et al.  Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies , 2013 .

[49]  Neveen Hamza,et al.  Renewable energy adoption in an ageing population: Heterogeneity in preferences for micro-generation technology adoption , 2011 .

[50]  Michael K. Price,et al.  Using Nonpecuniary Strategies to Influence Behavior: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment , 2011, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[51]  S. Donaldson,et al.  Understanding Self-Report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research , 2002 .

[52]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .