Attentional Switch Characteristics are Correlated with the Performance of Simulated Aviation Task

The present study explored what attentional switch characteristics are correlated with simulated aviation task performance. We measure the attentional switch characteristics based on three AB indices. When two targets are presented in a RSVP stream, the impairment in identification of the second target (T2) after correct report of the first target (T1) is attentional blink (AB). First, the overall switch cost is the AB magnitude which is the difference between the highest and lowest accuracy of T2 given correct report of T1 (T2/T1) across five T1-T2 intervals. Second, the general cost of processing T1 is measured by the average accuracy of T2/T1 across intervals. Finally, the AB dwell time is measured by the temporal interval when the accuracy of T2/T1 reach the lowest level across five T1-T2 intervals. The Multi-Attribute Task Battery (MATB) is used to simulate aviation tasks. The results show (1) AB dwell time is significantly correlated with the RT of monitoring dashboard; (2) average accuracy of T2/T1 is correlated with the performance of multiple tasks in the MATB including monitoring dashboard, resource management and tracking tasks. These results indicated that several AB indices might be useful for predicting the simulated aviation performance.

[1]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Similarity determines the attentional blink. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  R. Abrams,et al.  Hold the future, let the past go: Attention prefers the features of future targets , 2014, Cognition.

[4]  J. R. Comstock,et al.  Multi-Attribute Task Battery - Applications in pilot workload and strategic behavior research , 1991 .

[5]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual "cocktail party" effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Cognition and flight performance in older pilots. , 1997 .

[7]  R. Abrams,et al.  Endogenous orienting is reduced during the attentional blink , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  R. Abrams,et al.  Onset capture requires attention , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  R. Abrams,et al.  On the automaticity of contingent capture: disruption caused by the attentional blink , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Mirror image arm used in monocular, binocular, and blindfolded pointing , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[12]  Yu Tian,et al.  Predicting performance in manually controlled rendezvous and docking through spatial abilities , 2014 .

[13]  R. Abrams,et al.  Spatial Distribution of the Attentional Blink , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[14]  Kan Zhang,et al.  Spatial Distribution of Attention during Attentional Blink is Influenced by Eye Movements , 2013, Perception.

[15]  D Gopher,et al.  Measures of Attention as Predictors of Flight Performance , 1976, Human factors.