High-Fidelity Light Water Reactor Analysis with the Numerical Nuclear Reactor

Abstract The Numerical Nuclear Reactor (NNR) was developed to provide a high-fidelity tool for light water reactor analysis based on first-principles models. High fidelity is accomplished by integrating full physics, highly refined solution modules for the coupled neutronic and thermal-hydraulic phenomena. Each solution module employs methods and models that are formulated faithfully to the first principles governing the physics, real geometry, and constituents. Specifically, the critical analysis elements that are incorporated in the coupled code capability are a direct whole-core neutron transport solution and an ultra-fine-mesh computational fluid dynamics/heat transfer solution, each obtained with explicit (sub-fuel-pin-cell level) heterogeneous representations of the components of the core. The considerable computational resources required for such highly refined modeling are addressed by using massively parallel computers, which together with the coupled codes constitute the NNR. To establish confidence in the NNR methodology, verification and validation of the solution modules have been performed and are continuing for both the neutronic module and the thermal-hydraulic module for single-phase and two-phase boiling conditions under prototypical pressurized water reactor and boiling water reactor conditions. This paper describes the features of the NNR and validation of each module and provides the results of several coupled code calculations.

[1]  J. Lumley,et al.  A Realizable Reynolds Stress Algebraic Equation Model , 1993 .

[2]  B. Launder,et al.  Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Adrian Tentner,et al.  Advances in Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Two Phase Flow in a Boiling Water Reactor Fuel Assembly , 2005 .

[4]  Nobuhide Kasagi,et al.  Prediction of Anisotropy of the Near-Wall Turbulence With an Anisotropic Low-Reynolds-Number k–ε Turbulence Model , 1990 .

[5]  C. G. Speziale On nonlinear K-l and K-ε models of turbulence , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986 .

[7]  Thomas J. Downar,et al.  Methodology for coupling computational fluid dynamics and integral transport neutronics. , 2004 .

[8]  Thomas J. Downar,et al.  Development of a comprehensive modeling capability based on rigorous treatment of multi-physics phenomena influencing reactor core design. , 2004 .

[9]  Han Gyu Joo,et al.  Methods and performance of a three-dimensional whole-core transport code DeCART , 2004 .

[10]  Tae Hyun Chun,et al.  CFD Simulation of the Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in a Bare Rod Bundle , 2004 .

[11]  Kord Smith,et al.  FULL-CORE, 2-D, LWR CORE CALCULATIONS WITH CASMO-4E , 2002 .

[12]  H. Ninokata,et al.  A turbulence model study for simulating flow inside tight lattice rod bundles , 2005 .

[13]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[14]  D. H. Wood,et al.  Fully developed rod bundle flow over a large range of Reynolds number , 1984 .

[15]  Thomas J. Downar,et al.  Coupled calculations using the numerical nuclear reactor for integrated simulation of neutronic and thermal-hydraulic phenomena. , 2004 .

[16]  Thomas J. Downar,et al.  The Numerical Nuclear Reactor for High Fidelity Integrated Simulation of Neutronic, Thermal-Hydraulic and Thermo Mechanical Phenomena - Project Overview , 2004 .

[17]  Han Gyu Joo,et al.  Cell Based CMFD Formulation for Acceleration of Whole-core Method of Characteristics Calculations , 2002 .

[18]  L. Meyer,et al.  Experimental investigation of turbulent transport of momentum and energy in a heated rod bundle , 1998 .

[19]  George Yadigaroglu,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics for nuclear applications: from CFD to multi-scale CMFD , 2005 .

[20]  C. P. Tzanos,et al.  Evaluation of Turbulence Models for Flow and Heat Transfer in Fuel Rod Bundle Geometries , 2004 .

[21]  Han Gyu Joo,et al.  Solution of the C5G7MOX benchmark three-dimensional extension problems by the DeCART direct whole core calculation code , 2006 .

[22]  B. Launder,et al.  Development and application of a cubic eddy-viscosity model of turbulence , 1996 .

[23]  Moon Hee Chang,et al.  DYNAMIC IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EQUIVALENCE THEORY IN THE HETEROGENEOUS WHOLE CORE TRANSPORT CALCULATION , 2002 .