Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall-runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China

The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method is widely used for predicting direct runoff from rainfall. The ratio of initial abstraction ([a) to maximum potential retention (S) was assumed in its original development to be equal to 0.2 in SCS-CN method. The constant initial abstraction ratio is the most ambiguous assumption and requires considerable refinement. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the initial abstraction ratio, in an experimental watershed in the Three Gorges Area of China, by analyzing measured rainfall-runoff events; (2) to compare the performance of the traditional and modified la/S values with observed rainfall-runoff data. The dataset consisted of 6 years of rainfall and runoff measurements from the experimental watershed. The results indicated that the la/S values, using event rainfall-runoff data, varied from 0.010 to 0.154, with a median of 0.048. The average initial abstraction ratio of the watershed was equal to 0.053. The standard SCS-CN method underestimates large runoff events, yielded a slope of the regression line of 0.559 and an intercept of 0.301. The modified la/S value was about 0.05 that better predicted runoff depths with an R(2) of 0.804 and a linear regression slope of 0.834. It also improved model efficiency coefficient (E) to 0.768 compared with 0.482 for traditional la/S value. This la/S-adjusted SCS-CN method appears to be better appropriate for runoff prediction in the Three Gorges Area of China. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Maria Mimikou,et al.  Technical Note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece , 2007 .

[2]  T. Jackson,et al.  Sensitivity of SCS Models to Curve Number Variation , 1982 .

[3]  Jacques Gallichand,et al.  A modification to the Soil Conservation Service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China , 2006 .

[4]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  CREAMS: a field scale model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems [USA] , 1980 .

[5]  Van Mullem.  Runoff and Peak Discharges Using Green-Ampt Infiltration Model , 1991 .

[6]  Peijun Shi,et al.  The effect of land use/cover change on surface runoff in Shenzhen region, China , 2007 .

[7]  V. Ponce,et al.  Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity? , 1996 .

[8]  M. Shao,et al.  Use of soil moisture data and curve number method for estimating runoff in the Loess Plateau of China , 2007 .

[9]  Xixi Lu,et al.  Recent Changes of Sediment Yield in the Upper Yangtze, China , 1998, Environmental management.

[10]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  EFFECTS OF INITIAL ABSTRACTION AND URBANIZATION ON ESTIMATED RUNOFF USING CN TECHNOLOGY 1 , 2006 .

[11]  Moon Seong Kang,et al.  Applying SWAT for TMDL programs to a small watershed containing rice paddy fields , 2006 .

[12]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[13]  S. Mishra,et al.  On the Ia–S relation of the SCS-CN method , 2006 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  COMPARISON OF GREEN-AMPT AND CURVE NUMBER METHODS ON GOODWIN CREEK WATERSHED USING SWAT , 1999 .

[15]  T. Eldho,et al.  An Improved IaS Relation Incorporating Antecedent Moisture in SCS-CN Methodology , 2006 .

[16]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[17]  T. I. Eldho,et al.  Geospatial estimation of soil moisture in rain-fed paddy fields using SCS-CN-based model , 2008 .

[18]  R. Young,et al.  AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds , 1989 .

[19]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Physically based hydrologic modeling: 2. Is the concept realistic? , 1992 .

[20]  Surendra Kumar Mishra,et al.  A Sediment Graph Model Based on SCS-CN Method , 2008 .

[21]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  A Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Techniques on Small Upland Catchments , 1985 .

[22]  J. Arnold,et al.  AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS 1 , 1999 .

[23]  John R. Williams,et al.  EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. , 1990 .

[24]  Allen T. Hjelmfelt,et al.  Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio , 2003 .

[25]  V. Singh,et al.  SCS-CN-based modeling of sediment yield , 2006 .

[26]  H. Riedwyl.  Goodness of Fit , 1967 .

[27]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .