In Search of Effective Design Problems for Design Research

Much design theory research seeks to create, evaluate, improve or optimize design methods. Whether that research focuses on design thinking, tools, methods, or education, short design problems are often provided to participants in order to evaluate the effects of the variables being tested. When designing and creating such problems, certain characteristics may influence design outcomes: experience and exposure to the design problems vary between participants, and each problem may be more or less favorable to the controlled variable.In this paper we conjecture a small set of design problem characteristics that may influence experimental outcomes, and we discuss two experiments targeted at uncovering this influence. In our first experiment we examine differences in evaluation metrics between two design problems. In a follow up experiment we correlate the hypothesized characteristics to the variances in experiment outcome. These early results assist to further compare and contrast the empirical differences in common evaluation metrics, as well as show how familiarity and extent of the subjects’ knowledge of a design problem influence these metrics. We also expose the potential for interaction between the design method and the design problem.Copyright © 2015 by ASME

[1]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Evaluating the Directed Intuitive Approach for Bioinspired Design , 2014 .

[2]  James Louis Mathieson Connective complexity methods for analysis and prediction in engineering design , 2011 .

[3]  Kathy Potosnak,et al.  Conceptual design , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Assembly Time Modeling through Connective Complexity Metrics , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Manufacturing Automation.

[5]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems , 1977 .

[6]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Methods for Supporting Bioinspired Design , 2011 .

[7]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[8]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Beyond Function-Behavior-Structure , 2014 .

[9]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Mechanical Engineering Design Complexity Metrics: Size, Coupling, and Solvability , 2010 .

[10]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Analogical Problem Evolution in Biologically Inspired Design , 2014 .

[11]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods , 2011 .

[12]  Gregory M. Mocko,et al.  Engineering design complexity: an investigation of methods and measures , 2008 .

[13]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Grounded knowledge representations for biologically inspired design , 2013 .

[14]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate Engineering Students , 2012 .

[15]  Michael French,et al.  Invention and evolution : design in nature and engineering, 2nd ed. , 1988 .

[16]  Vinod Goel,et al.  The Structure of Design Problem Spaces , 1992, Cogn. Sci..