Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Wouter A Dreschler | Johannes Lyzenga | Koenraad S Rhebergen | Joost M Festen | W. Dreschler | J. Festen | K. Rhebergen | J. Lyzenga
[1] R. Drullman. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility , 1994 .
[2] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] G. Studebaker,et al. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] James M Kates,et al. Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] G A Studebaker,et al. Prediction and statistical evaluation of speech recognition test scores. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[6] B. Moore,et al. Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] D Byrne,et al. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] L. Robles,et al. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Wouter A Dreschler,et al. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] T. Houtgast,et al. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .
[11] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Hannes Müsch. Review and computer implementation of Fletcher and Galt’s method of calculating the Articulation Index , 2001 .
[13] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[14] G. Studebaker,et al. Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] G A Studebaker,et al. Frequency-importance and transfer functions for the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the NU-6 word test. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[17] Teresa Y C Ching,et al. Methods and Applications of the Audibility Index in Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting , 2002, Trends in amplification.
[18] A. Oxenham,et al. Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] Gerald A. Studebaker,et al. Audibility-Index Functions for the Connected Speech Test , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[20] G F Smoorenburg,et al. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Charactering the individual ear by the "Auditory Profile" , 2008 .
[22] I. Russell,et al. The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[23] Michelle R. Molis,et al. Effects of high presentation levels on recognition of low- and high-frequency speech , 2003 .
[24] C V Pavlovic,et al. Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] C V Pavlovic. Speech spectrum considerations and speech intelligibility predictions in hearing aid evaluations. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[26] Brian C J Moore,et al. Prediction of absolute thresholds and equal-loudness contours using a modified loudness model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] G. Studebaker,et al. Audibility-Index Predictions of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners’ Performance on the Connected Speech Test , 2003, Ear and hearing.
[28] A. Oxenham,et al. A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] D Byrne,et al. Maximizing Effective Audibility in Hearing Aid Fitting , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[30] L. Robles,et al. Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] C V Pavlovic. Band Importance Functions for Audiological Applications , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[32] A. Oxenham,et al. A further test of the linearity of temporal summation in forward masking. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] I M Noordhoek,et al. Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. I. Normal-hearing listeners. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] R. Plomp,et al. The Reception Threshold of Interrupted Speech for Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 1983 .
[35] Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al. Hearing Loss, Speech, and Hearing Aids , 1993 .
[36] B. Moore,et al. Modelling Changes in Frequency Selectivity with Level , 1999 .
[37] R Drullman,et al. Speech intelligibility in noise: relative contribution of speech elements above and below the noise level. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] I M Noordhoek,et al. Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Todd A Ricketts,et al. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] Sid P. Bacon,et al. Psychophysical Manifestations of Compression: Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2004 .
[41] Z Hou,et al. A Model to Evaluate and Maximize Hearing Aid Performance by Integrating the Articulation Index Across Listening Conditions , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[42] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. DETECTION OF DECREMENTS AND INCREMENTS IN SINUSOIDS AT HIGH OVERALL LEVELS , 1995 .
[43] I M Noordhoek,et al. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] Tammo Houtgast,et al. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] J. Allen,et al. Harvey Fletcher's role in the creation of communication acoustics. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] C. Turner,et al. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] Bosman Aj,et al. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC Syllables and Sentences for Listeners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment , 1995 .
[49] Harvey Fletcher,et al. Errata: The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to Telephony [J. Acous. Soc. Am. 22, 89 (1950)] , 1950 .
[50] C V Pavlovic,et al. An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[51] B. Moore,et al. A Model of Loudness Applicable to Time-Varying Sounds , 2002 .
[52] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[53] R M Cox,et al. Distribution of short-term rms levels in conversational speech. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[54] C M Rankovic. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] Bertram Schaf. Chapter Five – Critical Bands , 1970 .
[56] M. Ruggero. Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[57] B Kollmeier,et al. Speech intelligibility prediction in hearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivated perception model. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[58] G A Studebaker,et al. Regression equations for the transfer functions of ANSI S3.5-1969. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[59] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Modeling the Effects of Peripheral Nonlinearity in Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2019, Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
[60] D A Nelson,et al. The effect of basilar-membrane nonlinearity on the shapes of masking period patterns in normal and impaired hearing. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[61] H. Dillon,et al. An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .
[62] Articulation index: Importance function in the intensity domain , 1990 .
[63] G A Studebaker,et al. Age-related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[64] R Plomp,et al. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[65] T Houtgast,et al. Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[66] Bryce E. Lobdell,et al. A model of the VU (volume-unit) meter, with speech applications. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[67] Sid P. Bacon,et al. Cochlear Compression: Perceptual Measures and Implications for Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2003, Ear and hearing.
[68] B C Moore,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[69] C Ludvigsen. Prediction of speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[70] Timothy D Trine,et al. SII and fit-to-target analysis of compression system performance as a function of number of compression channels , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[71] K. D. Kryter. Methods for the Calculation and Use of the Articulation Index , 1962 .
[72] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[73] B C Moore,et al. Intensity discrimination: a severe departure from Weber's law. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[74] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[75] Wouter A Dreschler,et al. Prediction of the Intelligibility for Speech in Real-Life Background Noises for Subjects With Normal Hearing , 2008, Ear and hearing.
[76] Todd A Ricketts,et al. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[77] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[78] G. Studebaker,et al. Speech Spectra for Six Recorded Monosyllabic Word Tests , 1993, Ear and hearing.
[79] R. Plomp. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[80] B. Moore,et al. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.
[81] C V Pavlovic,et al. Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.