Principles of Sustainable Learning Object Libraries

As the effectiveness of learning objects in enhancing education becomes better understood, it will be critical to more fully develop the predictive characteristics of learning object usage by diverse instructors and their long-term sustainability in learning object repositories. Additionally, the advancement of scholarship in these endeavors – a critical factor for faculty to consider – has frequently been overlooked. In this paper we explore these issues by examining the technical and human aspects of The Library of Crop Technology (http://croptechnology.unl.edu) and other repository models. While studies have been conducted to research the impacts of animations on student learning, teacher perceptions of such learning objects have not been examined. An online survey instrument was created and sent to those who had downloaded animations from the Library of Crop Technology. Data collected indicated that educational, animated, learning objects are an effective and sustainable means of meeting a wide array of educator needs. This study identified a template of science content, organization, creation of interest in the topic, visual appeal, effectiveness for teaching a topic, and ease of use as being important to the overall teacher perception of the learning object’s quality. The very positive evaluation received from the users, coupled with their indication of returning to the site multiple times and recommending it to their colleagues, further suggests that the public repository is a model to continue pursuing. An important, but often overlooked, concept in the development of repositories is the dynamics of long term sustainability and scholarly contributions. A second study researched team development and institutional commitments which play a role in the long term stability of this learning object repository. A model integrating team development, institutional commitments, learning object development and scholarship recognition is proposed.

[1]  T. Gillespie,et al.  Organizations, Culture, and Teams: Links Toward Genuine Change. , 1998 .

[2]  Richard B. McKenzie,et al.  Managing through Incentives: How to Develop a More Collaborative, Productive, and Profitable Organization , 1998 .

[3]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Knowledge management tools for instructional design , 2002 .

[4]  Scott P. Schaffer,et al.  Integrating Knowledge, Performance, and Learning Objects , 2004 .

[5]  Amy E. Boren,et al.  Diamonds in the rough: A case study of team development across disciplines, distances, and institutions , 2005 .

[6]  P. McLeod,et al.  Rethinking Team Building in Geographically Dispersed Teams:: One Message at a Time , 2003 .

[7]  Lih-Juan ChanLin Attributes of Animation for Learning Scientific Knowledge , 2000 .

[8]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams , 2000 .

[10]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning , 2002 .

[11]  B. B. Morgan,et al.  An Analysis of Team Evolution and Maturation , 1993 .

[12]  Barbara Meyers,et al.  Observing Leadership Roles in Shared Decision Making: A Preliminary Analysis of Three Teams , 2001 .

[13]  David R. Kniefel,et al.  Review of "Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral Sciences, by Malcolm Fleming and W. Howard Levie", Educational Technology Publications, Inc. , 1980, SSOC.

[14]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[15]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[16]  Christopher Burns M.A. Innovative team building: Synergistic human resource development , 2005, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[17]  R. Wageman Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[18]  C. Gersick MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[19]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[20]  R. Kozma Technology and Classroom Practices : An International Study , 2003 .

[21]  Peter R. Scholtes,et al.  The Team Handbook , 2020 .

[22]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of mental models and dynamic visual displays , 1995 .

[23]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Using Computer Animated Graphics in Science Instruction with Children , 1990 .

[24]  J. Colquitt,et al.  KNOWLEDGE WORKER TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: THE ROLE OF AUTONOMY, INTERDEPENDENCE, TEAM DEVELOPMENT, AND CONTEXTUAL SUPPORT VARIABLES , 1997 .

[25]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Web page change and persistence - A four-year longitudinal study , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Sustainable Agriculture , 1993, Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.

[27]  Ian Gray,et al.  Area Of Expertise Teams: The Michigan Approach to Applied Research and Extension , 1998 .

[28]  R. Kozma Learning with Media , 1991 .

[29]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation in computer-based instruction , 1990 .

[30]  B. Gray,et al.  The Dynamics of Multidisciplinary Research Teams in Academia , 1999 .

[31]  M. Deutsch An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group Process , 1949 .

[32]  M. Fox Sustainable agriculture. , 1993, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[33]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managing Distances and Differences in Geographically Distributed Work Groups , 2002 .

[34]  David W. Brooks,et al.  “Link rot” limits the usefulness of web‐based educational materials in biochemistry and molecular biology * , 2003 .

[35]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Team Cohesion and Individual Productivity , 2001 .

[36]  Richard Edwards,et al.  The Academic Department: How Does It Fit into the University Reform Agenda?. , 1999 .

[37]  Miguel-Angel Sicilia,et al.  On the Concepts of Usability and Reusability of Learning Objects , 2003 .

[38]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[39]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Selective use of animation and feedback in computer-based instruction , 1992 .

[40]  Michael Schrage,et al.  No More Teams!: Mastering the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration , 1995 .

[41]  R. Kozma Technology and Classroom Practices , 2003 .