Visual constraints in written word recognition: evidence from the optimal viewing-position effect

In this paper we review the literature on visual constraints in written word processing. We notice that not all letters are equally visible to the reader. The letter that is most visible is the letter that is fixated. The visibility of the other letters depends on the distance between the letters and the fixation location, whether the letters are outer or inner letters of the word, and whether the letters lie to the left or to the right of the fixation location. Because of these three factors, word recognition depends on the viewing position. In languages read from left to right, the optimal viewing position is situated between the beginning and the middle of the word. This optimal viewing position is the result of an interplay of four variables: the distance between the viewing position and the farthest letter, the fact that the word beginning is usually more informative than the word end, the fact that during reading words have been recognised a lot of times after fixation on this letter position and the fact that stimuli in the right visual field have direct access to the left cerebral hemisphere. For languages read from right to left, the first three variables pull the optimal viewing position towards the right side of the word (which is the word beginning), but the fourth variable counteracts these forces to some extent. Therefore, the asymmetry of the optimum viewing-position curve is less clear in Hebrew and Arabic than in French and Dutch.

[1]  G. Underwood Cognitive processes in eye guidance , 2005 .

[2]  R. Shillcock,et al.  The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Dyslexics' eye fixations may accommodate to hemispheric desynchronization , 2004, Neuroreport.

[4]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[6]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Kindergarten Prediction of Reading Skills: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[7]  Ralph Radach,et al.  Phonological representation of words in working memory during sentence reading , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  T. Nazir,et al.  Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words , 2004, Brain and Language.

[9]  C. Whitney,et al.  Hemisphere-specific effects in word recognition do not require hemisphere-specific modes of access , 2004, Brain and Language.

[10]  V. Walsh,et al.  Magnetic stimulation studies of foveal representation , 2004, Brain and Language.

[11]  A. Leff A historical review of the representation of the visual field in primary visual cortex with special reference to the neural mechanisms underlying macular sparing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[12]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: A factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception , 2004, Brain and Language.

[13]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the split-fovea model of semantic processing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[14]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  T. M. Ellison,et al.  Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. , 2000, Psychological review.

[18]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Sentence reading: do we make use of orthographic cues in homophones? , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[19]  T. Nazir,et al.  Developing normal reading skills: aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[20]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  How Initial Fixation Position Influences Visual Word Recognition: A Comparison of French and Arabic , 1996, Brain and Language.

[21]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  On words and their letters , 1991 .

[23]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[26]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[27]  Nadia Ben Boutayab Interactions des facteurs visuels et lexicaux au cours de la reconnaissance des mots écrits : l'effet de la position du regard , 2004 .

[28]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Tatjana A. Nazir,et al.  Traces of Print Along the Visual Pathway , 2000 .

[30]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[31]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading , 1998 .

[32]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Right Visual Field Advantage and the Optimal Viewing Position Effect : On the Relation Between Foveal and Parafoveal Word Recognition , 1996 .

[33]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: time course of perceptual, lexical, and contextual processes , 1991 .

[34]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system. , 1990, Spatial vision.