Can increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) be used as a marker of quality of care in the absence of standardized screening? The potential effect of surveillance bias on reported DVT rates after trauma.

BACKGROUND Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients, even with appropriate prophylaxis. Many national agencies (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Joint Commission, National Quality Forum) have suggested DVT incidence as a measurement of health care quality, but none has recommended a standardized screening approach. Duplex ultrasound serves an important role as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for detection of DVT. However, screening of asymptomatic patients for DVT is somewhat controversial and these practices vary widely among trauma centers. We hypothesized that as the number of screening duplex examinations in trauma patients increases, the rate of DVT identification will also increase. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 21,961 patients from an urban, university-based Level I trauma center for more than 11 years (1995-2005). We grouped patients according to admission at the trauma service either before or after implementation of a written practice management guideline for DVT prophylaxis and duplex ultrasound surveillance in 1998. We compared duplex, DVT, and pulmonary embolism rates per 1,000 trauma admissions using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS The proportion of trauma patients having a duplex ultrasound increased significantly (20.9-81.5 per 1,000 trauma admissions, p < 0.0001). The rate of DVT reported increased 10-fold (0.7-7.0 per 1,000 admissions, p = 0.0024), significantly, between the two periods. The pulmonary embolism rate increased almost fivefold (0.7-3.2 per 1,000 admissions, p = 0.15), although this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Increasing the number of duplex screening exams resulted in an increased rate of DVT identification. In the absence of standardized surveillance, DVT rates may be more influenced by how often caregivers look for these events rather than the quality of care provided.

[1]  Sharon-Lise T Normand,et al.  Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Marlene R. Miller,et al.  Tracking progress in patient safety: an elusive target. , 2006, JAMA.

[3]  M. Knudson,et al.  Thromboembolism After Trauma: An Analysis of 1602 Episodes From the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Clifford W Colwell,et al.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. , 2004, Chest.

[5]  K. Campbell,et al.  Enhanced trauma program commitment at a level I trauma center: effect on the process and outcome of care. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[6]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Practice management guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: the EAST practice management guidelines work group. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Elizabeth B. Seislove,et al.  The role of surveillance duplex scanning in preventing venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  Alexander Crispin,et al.  Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[9]  G. Velmahos,et al.  Inability of an aggressive policy of thromboprophylaxis to prevent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in critically injured patients: are current methods of DVT prophylaxis insufficient? , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[10]  R. Falcone,et al.  Screening for major deep vein thrombosis in seriously injured patients: A prospective study , 1997, Annals of vascular surgery.

[11]  J. Weigelt,et al.  Cost-effective prevention of pulmonary embolus in high-risk trauma patients. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  M. Wilson,et al.  Venous thromboembolism in the high-risk trauma patient: do risks justify aggressive screening and prophylaxis? , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  J. Szalai,et al.  A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Is deep vein thrombosis surveillance warranted in high-risk trauma patients? , 1996, American journal of surgery.

[15]  L. Napolitano,et al.  Asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in the trauma patient: is an aggressive screening protocol justified? , 1994, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  J. Blebea,et al.  Surveillance venous scans for deep venous thrombosis in multiple trauma patients , 1995, Annals of vascular surgery.

[17]  L. Degutis,et al.  Prospective ultrasound evaluation of venous thrombosis in high-risk trauma patients. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.