Auditory temporal processes in normal-hearing individuals and in patients with auditory neuropathy

OBJECTIVE To study objectively auditory temporal processing in a group of normal hearing subjects and in a group of hearing-impaired individuals with auditory neuropathy (AN) using electrophysiological and psychoacoustic methods. METHODS Scalp recorded evoked potentials were measured to brief silent intervals (gaps) varying between 2 and 50ms embedded in continuous noise. Latencies and amplitudes of N100 and P200 were measured and analyzed in two conditions: (1) active, when using a button in response to gaps; (2) passive, listening, but not responding. RESULTS In normal subjects evoked potentials (N100/P200 components) were recorded in response to gaps as short as 5ms in both active and passive conditions. Gap evoked potentials in AN subjects appeared only with prolonged gap durations (10-50ms). There was a close association between gap detection thresholds measured psychoacoustically and electrophysiologically in both normals and in AN subjects. CONCLUSIONS Auditory cortical potentials can provide objective measures of auditory temporal processes. SIGNIFICANCE The combination of electrophysiological and psychoacoustic methods converged to provide useful objective measures for studying auditory cortical temporal processing in normals and hearing-impaired individuals. The procedure used may also provide objective measures of temporal processing for evaluating special populations such as children who may not be able to provide subjective responses.

[1]  D. A. Eddins,et al.  Chapter 6 – Temporal Integration and Temporal Resolution , 1995 .

[2]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[3]  Lei Gao,et al.  Auditory neuropathy. , 2015, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[4]  S. D. Thomas,et al.  Gap detection as a function of stimulus loudness for listeners with and without hearing loss. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J. Jerger,et al.  Norms for disproportionate loss in speech intelligibility. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[7]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[8]  S. Baumann,et al.  Gender differences in source location for the N100 auditory evoked magnetic field. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Mismatch negativity and psychoacoustic measures of gap detection in normally hearing subjects. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[10]  A. Starr,et al.  Brain potentials during mental distance judgments. , 1988, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  L. Trainor,et al.  Using mismatch negativity to measure auditory temporal resolution thresholds. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[12]  John Bamford,et al.  Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children , 1979 .

[13]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Temporal acuity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  G M Clark,et al.  Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  H. Michalewski,et al.  Sex differences in the amplitudes and latencies of the human auditory brain stem potential. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Alexander Gutschalk,et al.  Temporal resolution of the human primary auditory cortex in gap detection , 2002, Neuroreport.

[17]  Jacek Smurzynski,et al.  Temporal resolution in young and elderly subjects as measured by mismatch negativity and a psychoacoustic gap detection task , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  B. Moore.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[19]  N. Fujiki,et al.  Enhanced activation of the auditory cortex in patients with inner-ear hearing impairment: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Polich,et al.  Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Consequences of neural asynchrony: A case of auditory neuropathy , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[22]  Jufang He,et al.  ON and OFF Pathways Segregated at the Auditory Thalamus of the Guinea Pig , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Shannon,et al.  Absence of both auditory evoked potentials and auditory percepts dependent on timing cues. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  S. Jones,et al.  The auditory C-process of spectral profile analysis , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to on- and offsets of noise bursts. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[26]  a.R.V.,et al.  Clinical neurophysiology , 1961, Neurology.

[27]  A van Wieringen,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a general temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia , 2001, Neuroreport.

[28]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Y Sininger,et al.  Temporal and speech processing de ® cits in auditory neuropathy , 1999 .

[30]  R Hari,et al.  Cerebral magnetic responses to noise bursts and pauses of different durations. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[31]  Gary Rance,et al.  Speech Perception and Cortical Event Related Potentials in Children with Auditory Neuropathy , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[32]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[33]  J. Polich,et al.  Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Pathology and physiology of auditory neuropathy with a novel mutation in the MPZ gene (Tyr145->Ser). , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  T W Picton,et al.  Auditory neuropathy. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  D P Phillips,et al.  Auditory gap detection, perceptual channels, and temporal resolution in speech perception. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[37]  H. Davis,et al.  The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  B. Ross,et al.  The Auditory Evoked “Off” Response: Sources and Comparison with the"On" and the “Sustained” Responses , 1996, Ear and hearing.