Phase-shift model for the aggregation of amoebae: a computer study.

A simple theoretical model for the aggregation of amoebae is presented. A random and in other cases a homogeneous distribution of amoebae in a two-dimensional array appears to become unstable when the phase of the sustained oscillation of each individual cell is perturbed by diffusion coupling. The biochemical oscillation is supposed to be caused by autocatalytic back activation of the second order and to be localized in the membrane area of the amoebae. A chemotactic movement of the amoebae is compatible with the polar activation of the membrane caused by reaching the over-threshold concentration of an attractant in the local region of the membrane. The unstable perturbation of the limit cycle represents the local “firing” of the autocatalytic reaction. This triggering of the spike occurs earlier than that which follows in the unperturbed phase of the oscillation. The spatial variability of the chemotactic movement is asserted by the sustained periodic activities and by degradation of an attractant in the medium. The amoeba being in the “ready state” after its refractory period can respond very rapidly to the rotation of the external attractant gradient. The phase-shift gradient between the pacemaker centre (with the highest phase and frequency) and the other cells is a necessary condition for the chemotactic reaction and thereafter for the aggregation. This biochemical model of the aggregation was tested by computer simulation. The developed patterns of aggregated cells are comparable with published experimental results on cellular slime mould.

[1]  B. Shaffer Acrasin, the Chemotactic Agent in Cellular Slime Moulds , 1956 .

[2]  L. Segel,et al.  Traveling bands of chemotactic bacteria: a theoretical analysis. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  John Tyler Bonner,et al.  The Cellular Slime Molds. , 1967 .

[4]  B. Shaffer The Acrasina: (continued from vol. 2, pp. 109-182) , 1964 .

[5]  L. Segel,et al.  Instability of a layer of chemotactic cells, attractant and degrading enzyme. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  B. Shaffer Aspects of Aggregation in Cellular Slime Moulds 1. Orientation and Chemotaxis , 1957, The American Naturalist.

[7]  M. Cohen,et al.  Chemotaxis and the early stages of aggregation in cellular slime molds. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  E. Sel'kov,et al.  Self-oscillations in glycolysis. 1. A simple kinetic model. , 1968, European journal of biochemistry.

[9]  John Tyler Bonner,et al.  A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SLIME MOLD DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM , 1944 .

[10]  M. Cohen,et al.  Control of Aggregation in Dictyostelium discoideum by an External Periodic Pulse of Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate , 1972, Science.

[11]  J. Bonner,et al.  Evidence for the formation of cell aggregates by chemotaxis in the development of the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1947, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[12]  Reversal of inhibition of enzymes and the model of a spike oscillator. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  B. Goodwin,et al.  A phase-shift model for the spatial and temporal organization of developing systems. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  T. M. Konijn,et al.  Cell aggregation in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1961, Developmental biology.

[15]  V. Nanjundiah,et al.  Chemotaxis, signal relaying and aggregation morphology. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  R. Rosen,et al.  Dynamical System Theory in Biology , 1970 .

[17]  M. Cohen,et al.  Wave propagation in the early stages of aggregation of cellular slime molds. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  A J Durston,et al.  Dictyostelium discoideum aggregation fields as excitable media. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  L. Segel,et al.  Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.