Template-directed instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: cost savings analysis.

The use of digital radiography and templating software in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to become more prevalent as the number of procedures performed increases every year. Template-directed instrumentation (TDI) is a novel approach to surgical planning that combines digital templating with limited intraoperative instruments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the financial implications and radiographic outcomes of using TDI to direct instrumentation during primary TKA. Over a 1-year period, 82 consecutive TKAs using TDI were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics and preoperative templated sizes of predicted components were recorded, and OrthoView digital planning software (OrthoView LLC, Jacksonville, Florida was used to determine the 2 most likely tibial and femoral component sizes for each case. This sizing information was used to direct component vendors to prepare 3 lightweight instrument trays based on these sizes. The sizes of implanted components and the number of total trays required were documented. A cost savings analysis was performed to compare TDI and non-TDI surgical expenses for TKA. In 80 (97%) of 82 cases, the prepared sizes determined by TDI using 3 instrument trays were sufficient. Preoperative templating correctly predicted the size of the tibial and femoral component sizes in 90% and 83% of cases, respectively. The average number of trays used with TDI was 3.0 (range, 3-5 trays) compared with 7.5 (range, 6-9 trays) used in 82 preceding non-TDI TKAs. Based on standard fees to sterilize and package implant trays (approximately $26 based on a survey of 10 orthopedic hospitals performing TKA), approximately $9612 was saved by using TDI over the 1-year study period. Overall, digital templating and TDI were a simple and cost-effective approach when performing primary TKA.

[1]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  Value of preoperative templating for primary total knee arthroplasty. , 2009, The journal of knee surgery.

[2]  L. Specht,et al.  A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe? , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Carola van Pul,et al.  A New Digital Preoperative Planning Method for Total Hip Arthroplasties , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  N. Simunovic,et al.  Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  J. Lewis,et al.  Digital pre-operative templating is more accurate in total hip replacement compared to analogue templating , 2008, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[6]  David Fabi,et al.  Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2010, Orthopedics.

[7]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: a randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  P. Hodgson,et al.  The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  Derek R. Johnson The benefits of customized patient instrumentation to lower-volume joint replacement surgeons: results from practice. , 2011, American journal of orthopedics.

[10]  Andrew R. Hsu,et al.  Effect of training level on accuracy of digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2012, Orthopedics.

[11]  Hideo Noguchi,et al.  Comparison of analog 2D and digital 3D preoperative templating for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty , 2012, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[12]  J. Purtill,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty component templating: a predictive model. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  L. Specht,et al.  A Comparison of Acetate and Digital Templating for Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  B Bloch,et al.  How useful is templating for total knee replacement component sizing? , 2012, The Knee.

[16]  Eduardo A. Salvati,et al.  The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty , 2008, International Orthopaedics.