On the electrostatic component of protein-protein binding free energy

Calculations of electrostatic properties of protein-protein complexes are usually done within framework of a model with a certain set of parameters. In this paper we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the sensitivity of the electrostatic component of binding free energy (ΔΔGel) with respect with different force fields (Charmm, Amber, and OPLS), different values of the internal dielectric constant, and different presentations of molecular surface (different values of the probe radius). The study was done using the largest so far set of entries comprising 260 hetero and 2148 homo protein-protein complexes extracted from a previously developed database of protein complexes (ProtCom). To test the sensitivity of the energy calculations with respect to the structural details, all structures were energy minimized with corresponding force field, and the energies were recalculated. The results indicate that the absolute value of the electrostatic component of the binding free energy (ΔΔGel) is very sensitive to the force field parameters, the minimization procedure, the values of the internal dielectric constant, and the probe radius. Nevertheless our results indicate that certain trends in ΔΔGel behavior are much less sensitive to the calculation parameters. For instance, the fraction of the homo-complexes, for which the electrostatics was found to oppose binding, is 80% regardless of the force fields and parameters used. For the hetero-complexes, however, the percentage of the cases for which electrostatics opposed binding varied from 43% to 85%, depending on the protocol and parameters employed. A significant correlation was found between the effects caused by raising the internal dielectric constant and decreasing the probe radius. Correlations were also found among the results obtained with different force fields. However, despite of the correlations found, the absolute ΔΔGel calculated with different force field parameters could differ more than tens of kcal/mol in some cases. Set of rules of obtaining confident predictions of absolute ΔΔGel and ΔΔGel sign are provided in the conclusion section. PACS codes: 87.15.A-, 87.15. km

[1]  D. F. Waugh,et al.  Protein-protein interactions. , 1954, Advances in protein chemistry.

[2]  F M Richards,et al.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[3]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[4]  M K Gilson,et al.  The dielectric constant of a folded protein , 1986, Biopolymers.

[5]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[7]  J. Wells,et al.  Systematic mutational analyses of protein-protein interfaces. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[8]  Michael K. Gilson,et al.  The inclusion of electrostatic hydration energies in molecular mechanics calculations , 1991, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[9]  R M Stroud,et al.  Inclusion of solvation free energy with molecular mechanics energy: Alanyl dipeptide as a test case , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  G Schreiber,et al.  Interaction of barnase with its polypeptide inhibitor barstar studied by protein engineering. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[11]  B. Tidor,et al.  Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  M. Gilson,et al.  Prediction of pH-dependent properties of proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Kim A. Sharp,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules , 1994 .

[15]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[16]  E. Freire,et al.  Thermodynamic mapping of the inhibitor site of the aspartic protease endothiapepsin. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  A. Fersht,et al.  A calorimetric study of the thermal stability of barstar and its interaction with barnase. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[18]  G Schreiber,et al.  Energetics of protein-protein interactions: analysis of the barnase-barstar interface by single mutations and double mutant cycles. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  K. Sharp,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in hirudin-thrombin binding. , 1996, Biophysical chemistry.

[20]  M. Gilson,et al.  Computing ionization states of proteins with a detailed charge model , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  CHARGE SCREENING AND THE DIELECTRIC CONSTANT OF PROTEINS : INSIGHTS FROM MOLECULAR DYNAMICS , 1996 .

[22]  G Schreiber,et al.  Thermodynamics of the interaction of barnase and barstar: changes in free energy versus changes in enthalpy on mutation. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  G Schreiber,et al.  The role of Glu73 of barnase in catalysis and the binding of barstar. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  S. Jones,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Consistent Calculations of pKa's of Ionizable Residues in Proteins: Semi-microscopic and Microscopic Approaches , 1997 .

[26]  J A McCammon,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to the stability of halophilic proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  PARAMETER DEPENDENCE IN CONTINUUM ELECTROSTATIC CALCULATIONS : A STUDY USING PROTEIN SALT BRIDGES , 1998 .

[28]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[29]  A. Warshel,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to protein–protein binding affinities: Application to Rap/Raf interaction , 1998, Proteins.

[30]  G Schreiber,et al.  Biophysical characterization of the interaction of the beta-lactamase TEM-1 with its protein inhibitor BLIP. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[31]  P. Kollman,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein−Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies , 1999 .

[32]  Joanna Trylska,et al.  Thermodynamic linkage between the binding of protons and inhibitors to HIV‐1 protease , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  G Klebe,et al.  Improving macromolecular electrostatics calculations. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[34]  B Tidor,et al.  Charge optimization leads to favorable electrostatic binding free energy. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[35]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[36]  R. Norel,et al.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[37]  A. Warshel,et al.  Examining methods for calculations of binding free energies: LRA, LIE, PDLD‐LRA, and PDLD/S‐LRA calculations of ligands binding to an HIV protease , 2000, Proteins.

[38]  A. Elcock,et al.  Computer Simulation of Protein−Protein Interactions , 2001 .

[39]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Optimization of binding electrostatics: Charge complementarity in the barnase‐barstar protein complex , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[40]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Clustering of highly homologous sequences to reduce the size of large protein databases , 2001, Bioinform..

[41]  G. Vriend,et al.  Optimizing the hydrogen‐bond network in Poisson–Boltzmann equation‐based pKa calculations , 2001, Proteins.

[42]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Barstar is electrostatically optimized for tight binding to barnase , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  B Honig,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to protein–protein interactions: Fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[44]  Barry Honig,et al.  Extending the Applicability of the Nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann Equation: Multiple Dielectric Constants and Multivalent Ions† , 2001 .

[45]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Salt Bridges Stabilize the Folded Structure of Barnase , 2001 .

[46]  A. Warshel,et al.  What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.

[47]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[48]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Binding of aminoglycoside antibiotics to the small ribosomal subunit: a continuum electrostatics investigation. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[49]  E. Alexov,et al.  Combining conformational flexibility and continuum electrostatics for calculating pK(a)s in proteins. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[50]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Rapid grid‐based construction of the molecular surface and the use of induced surface charge to calculate reaction field energies: Applications to the molecular systems and geometric objects , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[51]  Barry Honig,et al.  On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Comparison of calculation and experiment implicates significant electrostatic contributions to the binding stability of barnase and barstar. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[53]  D. Case,et al.  Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  J. Mccammon,et al.  On the evaluation and optimization of protein X‐ray structures for pKa calculations , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[55]  C. Pace,et al.  The Contribution of Polar Group Burial to Protein Stability Is Strongly Context-dependent* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Calculating pKa values in enzyme active sites , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[57]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Contribution of surface salt bridges to protein stability: guidelines for protein engineering. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  B. Tidor,et al.  Surface salt bridges, double-mutant cycles, and protein stability: an experimental and computational analysis of the interaction of the Asp 23 side chain with the N-terminus of the N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein l9. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[60]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Role of the protein side‐chain fluctuations on the strength of pair‐wise electrostatic interactions: Comparing experimental with computed pKas , 2002, Proteins.

[61]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Charge optimization of the interface between protein kinases and their ligands , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[62]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[63]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Calculating proton uptake/release and binding free energy taking into account ionization and conformation changes induced by protein–inhibitor association: Application to plasmepsin, cathepsin D and endothiapepsin–pepstatin complexes , 2004, Proteins.

[64]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Relative contributions of desolvation, inter‐ and intramolecular interactions to binding affinity in protein kinase systems , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[65]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: organization, cooperativity and mapping in a bottom-up Systems Biology approach , 2005, Physical biology.

[66]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Statistical analysis and prediction of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Proteins.

[67]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Exploring the charge space of protein–protein association: A proteomic study , 2005, Proteins.

[68]  Barry Honig,et al.  An assessment of the accuracy of methods for predicting hydrogen positions in protein structures , 2005, Proteins.

[69]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Protein stability and surface electrostatics: a charged relationship. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[70]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Electrostatic contribution to the binding stability of protein–protein complexes , 2006, Proteins.

[71]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Electrostatic properties of protein-protein complexes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[72]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Modeling electrostatic effects in proteins. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[73]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Role of the charge-charge interactions in defining stability and halophilicity of the CspB proteins. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Poisson-Boltzmann calculations of nonspecific salt effects on protein-protein binding free energies. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[75]  C. Pace,et al.  Amino acid contribution to protein solubility: Asp, Glu, and Ser contribute more favorably than the other hydrophilic amino acids in RNase Sa. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[76]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Do electrostatic interactions destabilize protein-nucleic acid binding? , 2007, Biopolymers.

[77]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published October 28, 2006 PROTCOM: searchable database of protein complexes enhanced with domain–domain structures , 2006 .

[78]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Computational design of the Fyn SH3 domain with increased stability through optimization of surface charge–charge interactions , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[79]  E. Alexov,et al.  Optimization of electrostatic interactions in protein-protein complexes. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[80]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to protein stability and folding energy , 2007, FEBS letters.

[81]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Calculating the Protonation States of Proteins and Small Molecules: Implications to Ligand-Receptor Interactions , 2008 .

[82]  M F Lensink,et al.  Recognition-induced conformational changes in protein-protein docking. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[83]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Editorial [ Protein-Protein Interactions Guest Editor: Emil Alexov ] , 2008 .

[84]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou,et al.  Electrostatic rate enhancement and transient complex of protein–protein association , 2008, Proteins.

[85]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  Calculating pH and salt dependence of protein-protein binding. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[86]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? , 2008, Chemical reviews.

[87]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Cooperativity of complex salt bridges , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[88]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  Protein–protein binding is often associated with changes in protonation state , 2008, Proteins.