The Effects of Spatial Frequency on Binocular Fusion: From Elementary to Complex Images

Factors limiting binocular fusion were studied using 2-dimensional difference of Gaussian (2D-DOG) stimuli. The proportion of fused stimuli and observer's response time were determined for stimuli that varied in spatial frequency composition between 0.22 and 4.8 cycles per degree. At small disparities, mean fusion response times were short and relatively stable but increased rapidly once the disparity reached a certain critical value. This 2-phase function implies the existence of 2 separate fusional mechanism: a rapid neurally based fusional process, which operates at small disparities, and a second mechanism involving reflexive vergence movements operating at disparities 2 to 3 times larger. Both mechanisms are highly influenced by spatial frequency, being 4 to 5 times more effective at low spatial frequencies. Additional experiments demonstrated that with compound stimuli, the fusion limit is not determined by the highest spatial frequency components (as had been reported previously) but, rather, can take advantage of the additional fusional range associated with low spatial frequencies. Such cooperation may be obvious only in the case of 2-dimensional stimuli.

[1]  John Frisby,et al.  The role of spatial frequency tuned channels in vergence control , 1980, Vision Research.

[2]  J. J. KULIKOWSKI,et al.  Limit of single vision in stereopsis depends on contour sharpness , 1978, Nature.

[3]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Properties of stimuli eliciting vergence eye movements and stereopsis. , 1970, Vision research.

[4]  D. Mitchell.  Retinal disparity and diplopia. , 1966, Vision research.

[5]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Eye movement responses to convergence stimuli. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  D H Fender,et al.  Hysteresis in human binocular fusion: temporalward and nasalward ranges. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  C. Tyler.  Stereoscopic Vision: Cortical Limitations and a Disparity Scaling Effect , 1973, Science.

[9]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments , 1995, Vision Research.

[10]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Marr,et al.  Theory of human stereopsis (A) , 1977 .

[12]  R. Patterson,et al.  Factors that Affect Depth Perception in Stereoscopic Displays , 1992, Human factors.

[13]  B. Julesz,et al.  Modifications of the Classical Notion of Panum's Fusional Area , 1980, Perception.

[14]  B. L. Ginsborg,et al.  Small Voluntary Movements of the Eye * , 1953, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  B. Julesz,et al.  Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  S. W. Kuffler.  Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  A. M. Rohaly,et al.  Nature of coarse-to-fine constraints on binocular fusion. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Disparity processing of spatial frequencies in man , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  C. Tyler.  Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity , 1975, Vision Research.

[20]  Y. Yeh,et al.  Limits of Fusion and Depth Judgment in Stereoscopic Color Displays , 1990, Human factors.

[21]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[23]  W Richards,et al.  INDEPENDENCE OF PANUM'S NEAR AND FAR LIMITS* , 1971, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  F. A. Miles.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis by Ian P. Howard and Brian J. Rogers, Oxford University Press, 1995. £90.00 (736 pages) ISBN 0 19 508476 4. , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  Hanns-Christof Spatz,et al.  Frequency of Fusion and of Loss of Fusion, and Binocular Depth Perception with Alternating Stimulus Presentation , 1985, Perception.

[26]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Vergence Eye Movements Made in Response to Spatial-Frequency-Filtered Random-Dot Stereograms , 1981, Perception.

[27]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  P Milgram,et al.  Effects of Stereoscopic and Rotational Displays in a Three-Dimensional Path- Tracing Task , 1993, Human factors.

[29]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Binocular fusion limits are independent of contrast, luminance gradient and component phases , 1989, Vision Research.

[30]  John A. Roese.  Applications Of PLZT Electro-Optic Shutter Stereoscopic Displays , 1979, Optics & Photonics.

[31]  B. Julesz,et al.  Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry , 1975 .

[32]  H. Wilson,et al.  Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.