Early experience with a novel ambulatory monitor.

Ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring has addressed a wide variety of clinical needs with a wide variety of technical solutions, all with significant shortcomings and limitations. Common technical issues include patient discomfort and susceptibility to motion artifact related to lead wires, and limited data capacity leading to dependence on patient activation for selection of pertinent ECG rhythms for storage. We have been developing a novel ambulatory ECG monitor that addresses several of these issues. Small size and absence of lead wires improve patient comfort and reduce motion artifact but require novel, short ECG vectors. An integral motion sensor assists interpretation of remnant motion artifact. Large storage capacity permits recording of all ECG signals for a day at a time. Simple human factors design permit easy daily replacement of monitors for extended recording. Highly sensitive amplifiers and low artifact provide good-quality signal images, but the short vectors and close proximity to the heart, particularly the atria, result in ECG morphologies that appear different from more familiar recording technologies. We present some examples to illustrate the issues and generate productive discussion.

[1]  Firat Duru,et al.  Long-term continuous external electrocardiographic recording: a review. , 2006, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Skanes,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  Jonathan H Seltzer,et al.  The Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Prospective Multi‐Center Randomized Study Comparing Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Versus Standard Loop Event Monitoring , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[4]  M. Brignole,et al.  Incidence, diagnostic yield and safety of the implantable loop-recorder to detect the mechanism of syncope in patients with and without structural heart disease. , 2004, European heart journal.

[5]  J. Reiffel,et al.  Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Renke Maas,et al.  Diagnostic Yield of External Electrocardiographic Loop Recorders in Patients with Recurrent Syncope and Negative Tilt Table Test , 2003, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  Silvia G Priori,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Co , 2003, Circulation.

[8]  M. Schull,et al.  Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and cardiac arrest outcomes in 8,932 telemetry ward patients. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[9]  R Yee,et al.  Use of an extended monitoring strategy in patients with problematic syncope. Reveal Investigators. , 1999, Circulation.

[10]  V. Fuster,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conference , 2001, Circulation.

[11]  J. Alpert,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography). , 1999, Circulation.