Associative Recognition: a Case of Recall-to-reject Processing

Two-process accounts of recognition memory assume that memory judgments are based on both a rapidly available familiarity-based process and a slower, more accurate, recall-based mechanism. Past experiments on the time course of item recognition have not supported the recall-to-reject account of the second process, in which the retrieval of an old item is used to reject a similar foil (Rotello & Heit, 1999). In three new experiments, using analyses similar to those of Rotello and Heit, we found robust evidence for recall-to-reject processing in associative recognition, for word pairs, and for list-discrimination judgments. Put together, these results have implications for two-process accounts of recognition.

[1]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Judgments of semantic and episodic relatedness: Common time-course and failure of segregation , 1991 .

[2]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Hari K. Iyer,et al.  Model Discrimination for Nonlinear Regression Models , 1990 .

[4]  N. Anderson,et al.  Some psycholinguistic aspects of person perception , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[5]  A. Yonelinas.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  E Heit.  Influences of prior knowledge on selective weighting of category members. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[8]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: effects of interference and of response speed. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[9]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[10]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Contextual associations and memory for serial position. , 1973 .

[11]  A. Yonelinas.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[12]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Models for recall and recognition. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Koen Lamberts,et al.  Categorization under time pressure. , 1995 .

[14]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Speed and Accuracy in the Processing of False Statements About Semantic Information , 1982 .

[15]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[16]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[18]  J R Anderson,et al.  Interference in memory for multiple contexts , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[19]  E. Heit,et al.  An evaluation of the total similarity principle: effects of similarity on frequency judgments. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time , 1980 .

[21]  Ray Pike,et al.  Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition. , 1984 .

[22]  John Brown,et al.  Recall and Recognition , 1976 .

[23]  William K. Estes,et al.  Classification and cognition , 1994 .

[24]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Word frequency and serial position effects , 1963 .

[25]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[26]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[28]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  S. Clark,et al.  List length and overlap effects in forced-choice associative recognition , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[30]  B. Dosher.  Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Associative Interference and Retrieval Dynamics in Yes-No Recall and Recognition. , 1977 .

[32]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  I. Begg.  Trace loss and the recognition failure of unrecalled words , 1979 .

[34]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[35]  D. Callan,et al.  Forced-choice associative recognition: implications for global-memory models , 1993 .

[36]  Towards a similarity-based account of compatibility effects , 1994 .

[37]  R. B. May,et al.  Encoding Expectancies and Word Frequency in Recall and Recognition , 1982 .

[38]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[39]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  S. Clark,et al.  Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[41]  V. Gregg.  Word frequency, recognition and recall. , 1976 .

[42]  David A. Caulton,et al.  Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[43]  R. Nosofsky.  Exemplar-Based Accounts of Relations Between Classification, Recognition, and Typicality , 1988 .

[44]  E. Heit.  Modeling the Effects of Expectations on Recognition Memory , 1993 .

[45]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[47]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[48]  W. Whitten,et al.  Bidirectional synonym ratings of 464 noun pairs , 1979 .

[49]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[50]  S. Clark,et al.  Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[51]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[52]  G. Mandler.  YOUR FACE LOOKS FAMILIAR BUT I CANT REMEMBER YOUR NAME - A REVIEW OF DUAL PROCESS THEORY , 1991 .

[53]  K Lamberts,et al.  A feature-sampling account of the time course of old-new recognition judgments. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  R. McGee,et al.  Imagery and recognition memory: The effects of relational organization , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition , 1973 .

[56]  M. Humphreys.  Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval , 1978 .

[57]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Associative Interference Effects in Recognition and Recall , 1990 .

[58]  Evan Heit,et al.  Two-Process Models of Recognition Memory: Evidence for Recall-to-Reject? , 1999 .